Cardiovascular Journal of Africa: Vol 23 No 7 (August 2012) - page 61

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Vol 23, No 7, August 2012
AFRICA
409
SUBSCRIBE to CVJAfrica & SAJDVD
Fully searchable data set of CVJAfrica (2001-2012) & SAJDVD (2004-2012).
You can subscribe to both these journals online.
– subscription is 200 ZAR for 24/7 access to the CVJAfrica since 2001.
– subscription is 200 ZAR for 24/7 access to the SAJDVD.
Featured in this issue
Volume9Number1
March2012
SAJDVD
The SouthAfrican JournalofDIABETES&VASCULARDISEASE
Reviews
Ethics Focus
AchievingBestPractice
DiabetesEducator’s Focus
News
The electronic versionof
the journal is available at
Newantithromboticdrugs
Anticoagulation indiabetic
patients
Gliptins in type2diabetes
Riskofcardiovascular
disease in theBellvillepilot
study
Serum levelsofRAGE and
TNF-
α
in type2diabetes
Serum tumournecrosis
factor-
α
in type 2diabetes
Improvingwarfarin control
Liraglutide:an incretin
mimetic
WINAN IPAD!
To enter, subscribe to SAJDVDmonthly e-alerts
AFRICA
CardioVascular Journal of Africa (official journal for PASCAR)
JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2012
VOL 23NO 1
AFRICA
SEPTEMBER/OCTOBER 2011
VOL 22NO 5
CardioVascular Journal of Africa (official journal for PASCAR)
CardiovascularJournalofAfrica .Vol 22,No5,September/October2011
‡Under-treatment of hypercholesterolaemia
‡Mutation associated with hypertension
‡Echocardiographic findings in marfan syndrome
‡Effect of handgrip training on blood pressure
‡Cardiovascular risk profiles of untreated hypertensives
‡Anomalous origin of the left pulmonary artery
‡Double-chambered right ventricle
Printed byDurbanvilleCommercialPrintersTel:021946 4074
Answer
This elderly woman has atrial tachycardia with AV block due to digitalis excess. We’ve seen a number of examples in the past of
bi-level AV block – the concept being that alternating impulses are blocked ‘high’ in the AV junction and the potentially conductible
stimuli can block it at a (functionally) lower level.
The ladder diagram is my answer for this puzzler. There is some irregularity of the P–P cycle with an average rate of 187 per min.
Clearly, many P waves are not conducted.
I interpret this to represent 2:1 transmission with alternating impulses blocked ‘high’ and the potentially conductible stimuli showing
gradual prolongation (Wenckebach block) until the stimulus encounters refractoriness and is not conducted. This resulting pause
permits the next P wave, which previously had not been conductible, to now become the affective stimulus – leapfrog Wenckebach.
Is the concept clear? Any disagreements?
William Nelson ECG quiz
1...,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60 62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,...84
Powered by FlippingBook