CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Vol 23, No 2, March 2012
AFRICA
89
11. Thavarajah S, White WB, Mansoor GA. Terminal digit bias in a special-
ty hypertension faculty practice.
J Hum Hypertens
2003;
17
: 819–822
(PMID: 14704725).
12. Wingfield D, Cooke J, Thijs L, Staessen JA, Fletcher AE, Fagard R,
et
al
. on behalf of the Syst-Eur Investigators. Terminal digit preference
and single-number preference in the Syst-Eur trial: influence of quality
control.
Blood Press Monit
2002;
7
: 169–177 (PMID: 12131074).
13. Manning G, Brooks A, Slinn B, Millar-Craig MW, Donnelly R. Effects
of terminal digit preference on the proportion of treated hypertensive
patients achieving target blood pressures.
J Hum Hypertens
2001;
15
:
365 (PMID: 11378840).
14. Kim ESH, Samuels TA,Yeh H-C, Abuid M, Marinopoulos S, McCauley
J,
et al.
End-digit preference and the quality of blood pressure monitor-
ing in diabetic adults.
Diabetes Care
2007;
30
: 1959–1963 (PMID:
17485575).
15. Broad J, Wells S, Marshall R, Jackson R. Zero end-digit preference in
recorded blood pressure and its impact on classification of patients for
pharmacologic management in primary care – PREDICT – CVD-6.
Br
J Gen Pract
2007;
57
: 897–903 (PMID: 17976291).
16. Nietert PJ, Wessell AM, Feifer C, Ornstein SM. Effect of terminal digit
preference on blood pressure measurement and treatment in primary
care.
Am J Hypertens
2006;
19
: 147–152 (PMID: 16448884).
17. Graves JW, Bailey KR, Grossardt BR, Gullerud RE, Meverden RA,
Grill DE,
et al.
The impact of observer and patient factors on occur-
rence of digit preference for zero in blood pressure measurement in
a hypertension specialty clinic: Evidence for the need of continued
observation.
Am J Hypertens
2006;
19
: 567–572 (PMID: 16733227).
18. Carey IM, Nightingale CM, DeWilde S, Harris T, Whincup PH, Cook
DG. Blood pressure recording bias during a period when the quality
and outcomes framework was introduced.
J Hum Hypertens
2009;
23
:
764–770 (PMID: 19279657).
19. Ahmed M El BK. Knowledge of blood pressure measurement among a
teaching hospital staff in a developing nation.
J Hum Hypertens
1997;
11
: 495–499 (PMID: 9322830).
20. Reid CM, Ryan P, Miles H, Willson K, Beilin L, Brown MA,
et al.
Who is really hypertensive? – Quality control issues in the assessment
of blood pressure for randomized trials.
Blood Pressure
2005;
14
:
133–138.
21. Benegas JR, Guallar-Castillon P, Rodriguez-Artalejo F, Graciani A,
Lopez-Garcia E, Ruilope LM. Association between awareness, treat-
ment and control of hypertension, and quality of life among older adults
in Spain.
Am J Hypertens
2006;
19
: 686–693 (PMID: 16814122).
22. Haynes RB, Sackett DL, Taylor DW, Gibson ES, Johnson AL. Increased
absenteeism from work after detection and labelling of hypertensive
patients.
N Engl J Med
1978;
299
: 741–744 (PMID: 692548).
23. Wingfield D, Freeman GK, Bulpitt CJ on behalf of the General Practice
Hypertension Study Group (GPHSG). Selective recording in blood
pressure readings may increase subsequent mortality.
Q J Med
2002;
95
: 571–577 (PMID: 12205334).
24. Gonzalez-Lopez JJ, Ramirez JG-A, Garcia RT, Esteban SA, del Barrio
JA, Rodriguez-Artalejo F. Knowledge of correct blood pressure meas-
urement procedures among medical and nursing students.
Rev Esp
Cardiol
2009;
62
: 568–571 (PMID: 19406072).
25. Feher M, Harris-St John K, Lant A. Blood pressure measurement of
junior hospital doctors, a gap in medical education?
Health Trends
1992;
24
: 59–61 (PMID: 10121966).
26. Villegas IAI, Botero A, Escobar A. Evaluation of the technique used by
health-care workers for taking blood pressure.
Hypertension
1995;
26
:
1204–1206 (PMID: 7498997).
27. Markandu ND, Whitcher F, Arnold A, Carney C. The mercury sphyg-
momanometer should be abandoned before it is proscribed.
J Hum
Hypertens
2000;
14
: 31–36 (PMID: 10673728).
28. Jones DW, Frohlich ED, Grim CM, Grim CE, Taubert KA, for the
Professional Educational Committee, Council for High Blood Pressure
Research: Mercury sphygmomanometers should not be abandoned: an
advisory statement from the Council for High Blood Pressure Research,
American Heart Association.
Hypertension
2001;
37
: 185–186 (PMID:
11230268).
29. Burnier M, Gasser UE. End digit preference in general practice: A
comparison of the conventional auscultatory and electronic oscillomet-
ric methods.
Blood Pressure
2008;
17
: 104–109 (PMID: 18568699).
30. La Batide-Alanore A, Chatellier G, Bobrie G, Fofol I, Plouin P-F.
Comparison of nurse- and physician-determined clinic blood pres-
sure levels in patients referred to a hypertension clinic: implications
for subsequent management
. J Hypertens
2000;
18
: 391–398 (PMID
10779088).
