Cardiovascular Journal of Africa: Vol 23 No 7 (August 2012) - page 50

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Vol 23, No 7, August 2012
398
AFRICA
indicate arterial elasticity, which includes structure, elastin and
collagen.
It has been shown that
β
-adrenergic blocking agents,
diuretics, and some direct vasodilators such as hydralazine and
dihydralazine, only lowered blood pressure but had no effect on
vascular elasticity, whereas the ACE inhibitors, calcium channel
blockers in general and nitroprusside, in addition to their blood
pressure-lowering properties, also improved arterial elasticity.
10,14
In a six-month study it was shown that perindopril improved
arterial elasticity in hypertensive patients independent of its
blood pressure-lowering properties.
11
In a number of studies, possible mechanisms were
investigated. It was suggested that vascular collagen metabolism
plays a role. However, no correlation could be found between
matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-1, the tissue inhibitor of
MMP-1 (TIMMP-1), PWV and blood pressure in patients who
received perindopril for six months.
15
A more recent study
showed that ET-1 contributed to a decreased arterial compliance
in hypertension through inhibition of collagen degradation.
13
Furthermore, it has been shown that captopril therapy in
congestive heart failure decreased endothelin production.
12
However, in our study, no correlation could be found between
ET-1 levels and arterial elasticity in any arterial segment or at any
of the measured intervals. This was in contrast to a study done in
endurance-trained men, where a linear correlation between ET-1
and aortic PWV was found.
16
The segment in which the arterial elasticity is measured is
important. In a previous study it was found that perindopril
had a smaller effect on the elasticity in the carotid artery than
the femoral artery.
17
In contrast to our study where the arterial
elasticity in the brachial–ulnar segment was not affected by
perindopril, another study showed an improvement in brachial
elasticity.
18
Conclusion
In addition to its blood pressure-lowering effect, our study
confirms the improvement in arterial elasticity in the carotid–
femoral segment but not the brachial–ulnar segment in patients
on perindopril therapy. Furthermore, we have shown that ET-1
was not correlated to arterial elasticity in patients receiving
perindopril.
As referenced by Milan
et al.
,
the European Society
of Hypertension has now included in their guidelines the
improvement of arterial elasticity as one of the therapeutic aims
in the treatment of hypertension.
19
References
1.
Raij L, Gonzalez-Ochoa AM. Vascular compliance in blood pressure.
Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens
2011;
5
: 457–464. PMID: 21738031.
2.
Cavalcante JL, Lima JA, Redheul A
et al. J Am Coll Cardiol
2011;
57
:
1511–1522. PMID 21453829.
3.
Belz GG. Elastic properties and windkessel function of the human
aorta.
Cardiovasc Drugs Therapy
1995;
9
: 73–83.
4.
Isnard RN, Pannier BM, Laurent S, London GM, Diebold B, Safar
ME. Pulsatile diameter and elastic modulus of the aortic arch in essen-
tial hypertension: a noninvasive study.
J Am Coll Cardiol
1989;
13
:
399–405.
5.
Asmar R, Rudnichi A, Blacher J, London GM. Pulse pressure and aortic
pulse wave are risk markers of cardiovascular risk in hypertensive popu-
lations.
Am J Hypertension
2001;
14
: 91–97.
6.
Laurent S, Boutouyrie P, Asmar R, Gautier I, Laloux B, Guize L,
et
al.
Aortic stiffness is an independent predictor of all-cause and cardio-
vascular mortality in hypertensive patients.
Hypertension
2001;
37
:
1236–1241.
7.
McNiery CM, Wallace S, Mackenzie IS, McDonnel B, Yasmin,
Newby D,
et al.
Endothelial function is associated with pulse pres-
sure, pulse wave velocity, and augmentation index in healthy humans.
Hypertension
2006;
48
:
602–608.
8.
Safar ME. Systolic blood pressure, pulse pressure and arterial stiffness
as cardiovascular risk factors.
Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens
2001:
10
:
257–261.
9.
Cohn JN. Arterial compliance to stratify cardiovascular risk: More
precision in therapeutic decision making. Am J Hypertension 2001;
14
: 2–35.
10. Glasser SP, Arnett DK, McVeigh E, Finkelstein SM, Bank AK, Morgan
DJ, Cohn JN. The importance of arterial compliance in cardiovascular
drug therapy.
J Clin Pharmacol
1998;
38
: 202–212.
11. Asmar R, Topouchian J, Pannier B, Benetos A, Safar M. Pulse wave
velocity as endpoint in large scale intervention trial. The Complior
Study.
J Hypertension
2001;
19
: 813–818.
12. Mazurek W, Halawa B. Does captopril decrease endothelial production
of endothelin?
Pol Markuriusz Lek
1997;
15
: 105–108. PMID 9461703
13. Ergul A, Jupin D, Johnson MH, Prisant LM. Elevated endothelin-1
levels are associated with decreased arterial elasticity in hypertensive
patients.
J Clin Hypertens
2006;
8
: 549–554.
14. Kool MJ, Lustermans FA, Breed JG, Struijker Bodier HA, Hoeks AP,
Reneman RS, Van Bortel LM. The influence of perindopril and the
diuretic combination amiloride+hydrochlorothiaziede on the vessel
wall properties of large arteries in hypertensive patients.
J Hypertension
1995;
13
: 839–848.
15. Lacourciere Y, Beliveau R, Conter HS, Burgess ED, Lepage S, Pesant
Y,
et al.
Effects of perindopril on elastic and structural properties of
large arteries in essential hypertension.
Can J Cardiol
2004;
20
:
795–799.
16. Otsuki T, Maeda S, Iemitsu M, Saito Y, Tanimura Y, Ajisaka R,
Miyauchi T. Vascular endothelium-derived factors and arterial stiff-
ness in strength-and endurance-trained men.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ
Physiol
2007;
292
: H786–H791.
TABLE 2. EFFECT OF PERINDOPRIL 4 MG DAILY ON PWVAND ET-1 IN BLACK HYPERTENSIVE
PATIENTSAFTERA NINE-MONTHTREATMENT COMPARED TO HEALTHYVOLUNTEERS
Patients (
n
=
39)
Variable median (IQF 1–3)
Control (
n
=
51)
M0
M1
M3
M6
M9
Carotid–femoral PWV (m/s)
8.2**
(7.0–10.7)
11.6
(7.1–14.0)
9.3
(6.9–11.5)
7.96
(7.4–10.8)
9.6
(7.5–10.0)
7.5*
(6.3–10.5)
Brachial–ulnar PWV (m/s)
6.4 ns
(4.4–9.8)
6.4
(5.4–9.5)
6.4
(5.3–10.1)
6.8
(4.6–8.5)
7.2
(4.4–8.8)
6.1
(5.0–8.4)
ET-1 (pmol/l)
4.69**
(3.0–5.4)
6.15
(3.5–7.89)
7.55
(4.66–9.42)
7.96
(6.36–8.87)
8.15
(5.32–9.63)
4.53
(3.68–9.25)
Values are median IQF 25–75% (1st–3rd).
*Compared to baseline M0, M1, M3, M6 M9 after one, three, six and nine months of therapy (
p
<
0.05 Mann-Whitney rank sum test).
**Comparison between healthy volunteers (control) and baseline (M0) of patients before treatment. (
p
<
0.05 Mann-Whitney rank sum test).
1...,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49 51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,...84
Powered by FlippingBook