Cardiovascular Journal of Africa: Vol 34 No 1 (JANUARY/APRIL 2023)

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 34, No 1, January–April 2023 AFRICA 29 BMI and waist circumference. Br Med J Open 2016; 6: e010159. 54. Alberti K, Eckel RH, Grundy SM, et al. Harmonizing the metabolic syndrome: a joint interim statement of the international diabetes federation task force on epidemiology and prevention; national heart, lung, and blood institute; American heart association; world heart federation; international atherosclerosis society; and international association for the study of obesity. Circulation 2009; 120: 1640–1645. 55. World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Available from: https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethicalprinciples-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects/. [Accessed 19 February 2020]. 56. Mokwena K, Shiba D. Prevalence of postnatal depression symptoms in a primary health care clinic in Pretoria, South Africa: management of health care services. Afr J Phys Health Ed Rec Dance 2014; 20: 116–127. 57. Regitz-Zagrosek V, Lehmkuhl E, Mahmoodzadeh S. Gender aspects of the role of the metabolic syndrome as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Gend Med 2007; 4: S162–S177. 58. Modjadji P, Madiba S. The double burden of malnutrition in a rural health and demographic surveillance system site in South Africa: a study of primary schoolchildren and their mothers. BMC Public Health 2019; 19: 1087. 59. Puoane T, Steyn K, Bradshaw D, et al. Obesity in South Africa: the South African demographic and health survey. Obes Res 2002; 10: 1038–1048. 60. Motlhale M, Ncayiyana JR. Migration status and prevalence of diabetes and hypertension in Gauteng province, South Africa: effect modification by demographic and socioeconomic characteristics – a cross-sectional population-based study. Br Med J Open 2019; 9: e027427. 61. Noubiap JJ, Bigna JJ, Nansseu JR, et al. Prevalence of dyslipidaemia among adults in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health 2018; 6: e998–e1007. 62. Kassi E, Pervanidou P, Kaltsas G, et al. Metabolic syndrome: definitions and controversies. BMC Med 2011; 9: 48. 63. Martin MA, Lippert AM. Feeding her children, but risking her health: the intersection of gender, household food insecurity and obesity. Soc Sci Med 2012; 74: 1754–1764. 64. Otang-Mbeng W, Otunola GA, Afolayan AJ. Lifestyle factors and co-morbidities associated with obesity and overweight in Nkonkobe Municipality of the Eastern Cape, South Africa. J Health Popul Nutr 2017; 36: 22. 65. Wagner RG, Crowther NJ, Gómez-Olivé FX, et al. Sociodemographic, socioeconomic, clinical and behavioural predictors of body mass index vary by sex in rural South African adults-findings from the AWI-Gen study. Glob Health Action 2018; 11: 1549436. 66. Pradhan AD. Sex differences in the metabolic syndrome: implications for cardiovascular health in women. Clin Chem 2014; 60: 44–52. Sodium restriction in heart failure should be taken with a pinch of salt The time-worn, standard injunction against low-salt consumption in heart failure is not borne out by the evidence, writes MedicalBrief. The SODIUM-HF trial, conducted at 26 sites in six countries over six years, concludes that dietary intervention to reduce sodium intake did not reduce clinical events. Therapy for heart failure has come a long way in a short time, writes Dr John Mandrola in Medscape. Yet clinicians place substantial burden on patients with chronic heart failure, asking them to take numerous medicines, make frequent appointments, exercise and eat well. Strict sodium restriction is one of those burdens. He writes: at the American College of Cardiology (ACC) 2022 Scientific Session (2 April), Justin Ezekowitz, from the University of Alberta, Canada, presented results of the SODIUM-HF trial, which put this common recommendation to the test of randomisation. The Lancet simultaneously published the study. Before SODIUM-HF, there was little to no supportive evidence for strict sodium restriction. A systematic review of nine studies found no consistent benefit of low-sodium regimens. SODIUM-HF is a pragmatic randomised, controlled trial that tested general advice on dietary sodium against a low-sodium diet of 1 500 mg daily. Unlike drug trials, which can strictly control active and treatment arms in a relatively optimal setting, pragmatic trials test interventions in the real world. This difference influences how we interpret and apply the trial results. Patients in SODIUM-HF had class II–III New York Heart Association heart failure and were recruited mostly from primary care settings. They were typical of out-patients with heart failure: average age 66 years, average left ventricular ejection fraction of 36%, good medical therapy. The study was carried out in 26 sites in six countries over six years. Food and menus were individualised to local region and country. About 400 patients were in each arm. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death and hospitalisation or emergency department visit for cardiovascular (CV) reasons. The average sodium intake, as measured by three-day food records, was approximately 2 000 mg/day in the control group and about 1 600 mg/day in the low-sodium arm. A primary outcome occurred in 15% of the low-sodium arm versus 17% of the control arm, which did not meet statistical significance (hazard ratio 0.89; 95% CI: 0.69–1.26; p = 0.53). Death, CV hospitalisations and CV emergency department visits did not differ significantly between groups. Patients in the low-sodium arm scored significantly better on the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire, which measures a person’s perception of their health. A caveat here is that the trial was open-label, so a placebo effect is possible. The authors concluded with just one spin-free sentence: ‘In ambulatory patients with heart failure, a dietary intervention to reduce sodium intake did not reduce clinical events.’ Comments Since the results and conclusions were so clear, let’s discuss the trial’s limitations, which influence how we translate this finding to the care of patients. At ACC and online, SODIUM-HF endured some pushback. It stirred a defensive urge in me. continued on page 34

RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy NDIzNzc=