Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  10 / 66 Next Page
Basic version Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 10 / 66 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 25, No 6, November/December 2014

260

AFRICA

we aimed in this study to compare standard and patient-targeted

in-patient education in terms of their effect on patients’ anxiety

about self-care after discharge.

Methods

One hundred and ninety-eight patients who were hospitalised

in the cardiovascular surgery clinic between February and

August 2013 for coronary artery bypass surgery were included

in the study. The study was approved by the institutional ethics

committee, and all patients gave consent to participate in the

study.

Patients were randomised into two groups based on the

content of education: standard education (group 1,

n

=

100) and

individualised education (group 2,

n

=

100) on the management

of patients’ healthcare at home after discharge. Patients in group

2 were assessed with the patient learning needs scale (PLNS)

to define their perception of learning needs to manage their

healthcare after discharge. These patients were given education

that was specified according to their individual needs.

Education was given at the same time daily from the first day

of hospitalisation until the day the patient was discharged from

the clinic. The duration of hospitalisation was four to five days

for all patients.

The level of anxiety of patients was measured by the

state–trait anxiety inventory (STAI) before education and on

discharge. The STAI scores were compared between the groups

and before and after education. Additionally, the effects of socio-

demographic variables on the change of anxiety scores in each

group were evaluated.

The education was given by one investigator to all patients

in both groups. The STAIs were given to patients by another

investigator who was blinded to the patients’ study groups. Only

patients’ initials (not full names) and a code for education group

were marked on the STAIs; thus the data entry and analysis were

blinded to the study groups.

The education and outcomes were evaluated during the

patients’ hospitalisation, in which time no serious complications

were recorded.

The education given to in-patients by nurses in cardiovascular

surgery clinics aims to help patients to meet their home-care

needs before and after surgery, to facilitate getting help from the

healthcare team, to accelerate the healing process, and to ensure

the transition to a normal life as soon as possible. On the basis

of these aims, a standard education that was developed by Ozcan

et al

.,

15

which includes topics on drug use, coping with pain,

surgical wound care, prevention of adverse effects, diet, exercise,

rest, hygiene maintenance, constipation, alcohol and tobacco

use, sexual activity, mood changes, emergencies, occupations and

time of control visits was given face to face to group 1 patients

for about 30 to 40 minutes daily. During this time, topics were

repeated as necessary, taking into account individual differences.

An education booklet including details on all topics was used

during the education sessions. Patients in group 2 were given

education that was individualised according to their specific

need, which were determined by the PLNS.

Study questionnaires

The PLNS was developed to measure patients’ learning needs in

order to manage their healthcare at home after discharge from

hospital.

16

It is completed in less than 20 minutes. It has 50 items

scored from 0 to 5, and seven subscales (medication, activities

of living, feelings related to condition, community and follow

up, treatment and complications, enhancing quality of life, and

skin care), yielding a total score of 40 to 200, with higher scores

indicating more importance being placed on having information

at discharge. The reliability and validity of the PLNS were shown

by Bubela

et al

.,

17

and the Turkish version was also shown to be

reliable and valid.

18

The STAI is a commonly used self-report measure of anxiety,

which is a four-point Likert scale and consists of 40 questions.

19

The STAI measures two types of anxiety: state anxiety, or

anxiety about an event, and trait anxiety, or anxiety level as a

personal characteristic. Higher scores are positively correlated

with higher levels of anxiety. It can be used to diagnose anxiety

and distinguish it from depressive syndromes, and also as an

indicator of caregiver distress. Its reliability and validity were

demonstrated.

19,20

It is offered in 12 languages, including Turkish.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistical methods (frequency, percentage, mean,

standard deviation) were used to summarise data, and the

Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was used to determine whether

data were distributed normally or not. For the comparison of

quantitative data between groups, the independent samples

t

-test

and Mann–Whitney

U

-test were applied for parameters with and

without normal distribution, respectively.

To compare quantitative data of more than two groups

with normal distribution, Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney

U

-tests were used. For in-group comparisons the paired-sample

t

-test was used. Pearson’s correlation analysis was performed to

define the correlation between quantitative variables, and the

outcome was expressed as correlation coefficient (

r

) and level of

significance (

p

).

The level of statistical significance was set at

p

<

0.05.

Statistical analyses were performed using computer software

(Statistical Package for Social Sciences, Version 19.0, SPSS Inc,

Chicago, Illinois, USA).

Results

The mean ages of the patients in group 1 (

n

=

98) and group

2 (

n

=

100) were 62.1

±

10.2 and 59.1

±

9.8 years, respectively,

and the number of male/female patients were 73/25 and 72/28,

respectively. Other socio-demographic and clinical characteristics

of the study patients are summarised in Table 1.

The study groups were homogeneous in terms of gender,

marital status, having children, working status, smoking, alcohol

consumption, and being on a diet (

p

>

0.05). There was no

significant difference between group 1 and group 2 in terms of

age, weight, education, income and frequency of exercise (

p

<

0.05) (Table 1).

The STAI scores showed no statistical difference between

the study groups before education (

p

=

0.168 and

p

=

0.583,

respectively). However, both anxiety scores were significantly

lower in group 2 than in group 1 after education (

p

<

0.001 for

STAI scores). Furthermore, while state anxiety did not change in

group 1 after education (

p

=

0272), it decreased significantly in