Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  21 / 70 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 21 / 70 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 27, No 5, September/October 2016

AFRICA

291

Could the novel ‘double-hole’ technique be an alternative

for the inflow occlusion method?

Sahin Bozok, Gokhan Ilhan, Hızır Kazdal, Berkan Ozpak, Ismail Yurekli, Serdar Bayrak, Mert Kestelli

Abstract

Background:

Inflow occlusion on beating heart and cardio-

pulmonary bypass techniques have been proposed for the

removal of foreign material, such as stents, catheters and mass

lesions, from cardiac chambers. However, both techniques are

not devoid of disadvantages and complications. In this article,

we define an alternative, novel ‘double-hole’ technique, which

is based on opening the right atrium without cardiopulmo-

nary bypass.

Methods:

Bovine hearts were obtained from a local supermar-

ket. Two purse-string sutures were placed in the right atrium

using 2-0 braided, non-absorbable polyester suture material,

one close to the auricle, and the other close to the intera-

trial septum. The guidewire of a haemodialysis catheter was

inserted through the superior vena cava into the right atrium

and passed all the way through the right ventricle.

Results:

We suggest that the double-hole technique may be

useful, especially in revision cases with adhesions. Further

research should be performed to document the efficacy and

safety of this method.

Conclusion:

We are aware that further extensive research is

necessary to investigate the utility of this novel technique in

contemporary cardiovascular surgery. We believe the double-

hole technique has the potential to become a safe, practical

and effective measure in the future.

Keywords:

inflow occlusion, foreign body, extraction, double-

hole technique, extracorporeal circulation.

Submitted 5/10/15, accepted 2/3/16

Published online 12/4/16

Cardiovasc J Afr

2016;

27

: 291–293

www.cvja.co.za

DOI: 10.5830/CVJA-2016-020

Inflow occlusion on a beating heart (IOBH) is a technique

that was used more often in cardiovascular surgery before the

cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) era. Nowadays, this technique

is reserved for cases such as pulmonary or aortic valvotomy,

cardiac injury, atrial septectomy and extraction of intracardiac

thrombus or foreign body.

1-3

CPB can alternatively be used for these operations.

Complications may arise due to technical issues, such as tissue

injury during cannulation or embolic events. Peri-operative

problems arising from the inflammatory process caused by

extracorporeal circulation signify that CPB is not a technique

devoid of complications, in comparison to IOBH.

1

To eliminate the disadvantages of IOBH and CPB, we have

developed a novel technique on a bovine heart. We hope that

the ‘double-hole’ technique could provide a safe and effective

alternative in the removal of foreign material such as catheters

and pacemaker leads.

Methods

All animal studies were carried out with the approval of the

Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Bovine hearts

were obtained from a local supermarket. Two purse-string

sutures were placed in the right atrium using 2-0 braided,

non-absorbable polyester suture material (Ticron

®

, Covidien,

Norwalk, CT 06856, USA), one close to the auricle, and the

other close to the interatrial septum.

The guidewire of a haemodialysis catheter was inserted

through the superior vena cava into the right atrium and passed

all the way through the right ventricle. A stab wound was made

within the purse-string sutures and the left index finger was

introduced into the right atrium through the dilated hole, close

to the auricle. In the right hand, a curved haemostatic clamp

was introduced through the dilated hole, close to the interatrial

septum (Fig. 1A). A guidewire or catheter inside the right atrium

was pushed towards the other hole with the tip of the left index

finger and caught with the clamp in the other hole, held by the

right hand, and extracted (Fig. 1B).

Following visualisation and extraction, the wire was cut into

proximal and distal pieces. The proximal piece was extracted

(Fig. 2A), and the distal piece was then removed (Fig. 2B).

Repetition of this procedure revealed that we were able to

retrieve the wire with the clamp every time, and the two pieces

of wire were removed, where after the right atrium was closed

with snares.

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Faculty of

Medicine, Recep Tayyip Erdogan University, Training and

Research Hospital, Rize, Turkey

Sahin Bozok, MD,

sahinboz@yahoo.com

Gokhan Ilhan, MD

Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty

of Medicine, Recep Tayyip Erdogan University, Training and

Research Hospital, Rize, Turkey

Hızır Kazdal, MD

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Faculty of

Medicine, Izmir Katip Celebi University, Atatürk Training

and Research Hospital,

İ

zmir, Turkey

Berkan Ozpak, MD

Ismail Yurekli, MD

Mert Kestelli, MD

Institute of Oncology, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey

Serdar Bayrak, MD