Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  37 / 88 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 37 / 88 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 28, No 4, July/August 2017

AFRICA

239

<

0.001); SBP and WC (

r

= 0.30,

p

= 0.004); SBP and BMI (

r

=

0.24,

p

= 0.03) and DBP and WC (

r

= 0.26,

p

= 0.01). There was

a negative correlation between HDL-C and TG levels (

r

= –0.45,

p

= 0.02) (Table 5). In the south there was a positive correlation

between TC and TG levels (

r

= 0.48,

p

= 0.02); TC and SBP or

DBP (

r

= 0.44,

p

= 0.03;

r

= 0.54,

p

= 0.006, respectively); LDL-C

and BG (

r

= 0.43,

p

= 0.03); LDL-C and DBP (

r

= 0.49,

p

= 0.01)

and TG and SBP (

r

= 0.54,

p

= 0.006) (Table 6).

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, CVD risk factors in northern and

southern Cameroonians have not been studied before. Average

WC and BMI from the studied population were significantly

higher in the south than the north. However, the prevalence

of obesity, determined by either BMI (

±

21%) or WC (

±

65%),

was comparable between northern and southern Cameroonians,

but based on BMI, higher than that in the entire Cameroonian

population (

±

10%).

14

In addition, our data are in agreement

with a study performed on the urban labour force from Douala

(south) showing an obesity prevalence of 23%, based on BMI.

17

The range limits used to establish each category (normal,

overweight and obese) could explain the lack of difference in

obesity prevalence between southerners and northerners, despite

differences in average BMI and WC values. Based on BMI

measurements, southern women displayed higher prevalence

of obesity compared to northern women (34 vs 20%). Obesity

prevalence determined in southern women (34%) was close to

Table 4. Anthropometric and biochemical parameters

among subjects of two age groups

Parameters

35–50 years

51–65 years

p-

value

WC (cm) (

n

= 192)

Mean

±

SEM

91.48

±

1.77

91.01

±

1.92

0.86

Normal,

n

(%)

37 (19)

69 (36)

0.50

Obese,

n

(%)

37 (19)

49 (26)

BMI (kg/m

2

) (

n

= 192)

Mean

±

SEM

29.42

±

0.86

26.00

±

0.93

0.01

Normal,

n

(%)

37 (19)

33 (17)

0.08

Overweight,

n

(%)

38 (20)

39 (20)

Obese,

n

(%)

31 (16)

14 (8)

BG (mg/dl) (

n

= 192)

Mean

±

SEM

92.46

±

11.63 117.48

±

12.60

0.15

[mmol/l]

[5.13

±

0.65]

[6.52

±

0.70]

Normal,

n

(%)

78 (41)

65 (34)

0.42

Limit,

n

(%)

22 (11)

12 (6)

Diabetes,

n

(%)

6 (3)

9 (5)

SBP (mmHg) (

n

= 192)

Mean

±

SEM

115.61

±

8.80

135.17

±

9.53

0.14

Normal,

n

(%)

71 (37)

47 (25)

0.05

Hypertensive,

n

(%)

35 (18)

39 (20)

DBP (mmHg) (

n

= 192)

Mean

±

SEM

88.65

±

2.44

94.14

±

2.65

0.13

Normal,

n

(%)

53 (28)

41 (21)

0.43

Hypertensive,

n

(%)

53 (28)

45 (23)

p

-value for the comparison of means by Student’s

t

-test for independent samples

or Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test and chi-squared test for the comparison of

percentages between the two age groups.

WC, waist circumference; BMI, body mass index; BG, blood glucose; SBP,

systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure.

Table 5. Correlations between parameters in the northerners

BG TC HDL-C TG LDL-C SBP DBP WC BMI

BG CC 1

Sig

n

89

TC CC 0.13 1

Sig 0.54

n

25

25

HDL-C CC 0.17 –0.03 1

Sig 0.41 0.87

n

25

25

25

TG CC 0.23 0.61 –0.45 1

Sig 0.27 0.001 0.02

n

25

25

25

25

LDL-C CC 0.004 0.95 –0.21 0.49 1

Sig 0.98

<

0.001 0.32 0.01

n

25

25

25

25 25

SBP CC 0.09 –0.20 0.07 –0.18 –0.19 1

Sig 0.39 0.32 0.75 0.39 0.36

n

89

25

25

25 25

89

DBP CC 0.14 –0.16 0.10 0.03 –0.24 0.82 1

Sig 0.21 0.44 0.64 0.88 0.26

<

0.001

n

89

25

25

25 25

89

89

WC CC 0.02 –0.06 0.36 –0.38 –0.05 0.30 0.26 1

Sig 0.87 0.77 0.08 0.06 0.81 0.004 0.01

n

89

25

25

25 25

89

89 89

BMI CC 0.01 0.02 0.29 –0.11 –0.04 0.24 0.19 0.72 1

Sig 0.93 0.92 0.15 0.61 0.86 0.03 0.07

<

0.001

n

89

25

25

25 25

89

89 89

89

CC, correlation coefficient;

n

, sample size; Sig,

p

-value; WC, waist circumference; BMI,

body mass index; BG, blood glucose; TC, total cholesterol; HDL-C, high-density lipo-

protein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; TG, triglycerides; SBP,

systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure.

Table 6. Correlations between parameters in the southerners

BG TC HDL-C TG LDL-C SBP DBP WC BMI

BG CC 1

Sig

n

103

TC CC 0.36 1

Sig 0.07

n

25 25

HDL-C CC –0.03 0.25 1

Sig 0.88 0.23

n

25 25

25

TG CC –0.01 0.48 0.013 1

Sig 0.95 0.02 0.951

n

25 25

25

25

LDL-C CC 0.43 0.89 –0.14 0.25 1

Sig 0.03

<

0.001 0.51 0.23

n

25 25

25

25 25

SBP CC –0.18 0.44 0.29 0.54 0.22 1

Sig 0.08 0.03 0.16 0.006 0.28

n

103 25

25

25 25

103

DBP CC –0.02 0.54 0.02 0.39 0.49 0.71 1

Sig 0.85 0.006 0.92 0.06 0.01

<

0.001

n

103 25

25

25 25

103 103

WC Cc 0.19 0.03 0.03 –0.37 0.13 0.12 0.13 1

Sig 0.07 0.88 0.90 0.07 0.54 0.25 0.21

n

103 25

25

25 25

103 103 103

BMI CC 0.13 –0.09 0.03 –0.21 0.04 0.15 0.16 0.80 1

Sig 0.22 0.68 0.90 0.10 0.86 0.16 0.12

<

0.001

n

103 25

25

25 25

103 103 103 103

CC, correlation coefficient;

n

, sample size; Sig,

p

-value; WC, waist circumference; BMI,

body mass index; BG, blood glucose; TC, total cholesterol; HDL-C, high-density lipo-

protein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; TG, triglycerides; SBP,

systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure.