Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  20 / 78 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 20 / 78 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 30, No 1, January/February 2019

18

AFRICA

despite the availability of local and international dyslipidaemia

management guidelines with well-publicised LDL-C targets.

Fewer than half of patients (41.4%) were at or below their

LDL-C target, and target achievement rates were lower (32.3%)

for those patients at very high cardiovascular risk and moderate

risk (14.3%). These results are consistent with the overall findings

of the ICLPS study, which demonstrated that lipid management

remains suboptimal in countries outside of Western Europe.

15

Similar rates of LDL-C goal achievement (

50%) were

reported for previous studies conducted in South Africa,

13,14

demonstrating a lack of improvement in dyslipidaemia

management over recent years. Factors that may contribute

to low LDL-C goal achievement rates include prescription of

inadequate statin doses, use of moderate- or low-potency statins,

Table 1. Demographics, presenting characteristics and medical history of the study population overall and by cardiovascular risk level

Variables

Total

(

n

=

396)

Risk level

Low

(

n

=

1)

Moderate

(

n

=

7)

High

(

n

=

123)

Very high

(

n

=

223)

Not assessable

a

(

n

=

42)

Demographics

Age (years), mean (SD)

60.0 (10.2)

43.0

43.4 (13.9)

57.8 (10.0)

62.4 (9.1)

56.9 (11.2)

Men,

n

(%)

223 (56.3)

1 (100.0)

6 (85.7)

52 (42.3)

142 (63.7)

22 (52.4)

Ethnicity,

n

(%)

Asian/South Asian/Indian

98 (24.7)

0 (0.0)

2 (28.6)

34 (27.6)

59 (26.5)

3 (7.1)

Black African

96 (24.2)

0 (0.0)

1 (14.3)

46 (37.4)

32 (14.3)

17 (40.5)

Caucasian/European

144 (36.4)

1 (100.0)

4 (57.1)

26 (21.1)

94 (42.2)

19 (45.2)

Other

58 (14.6)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

17 (13.8)

38 (17.0)

3 (7.1)

Residence location,

n

(%)

Urban/suburban

367 (92.7)

0 (0.0)

6 (85.7)

117 (95.1)

208 (93.3)

36 (85.7)

Rural

29 (7.3)

1 (100.0)

1 (14.3)

6 (4.9)

15 (6.7)

6 (14.3)

Educational level,

n

(%)

Illiterate

7/391 (1.8)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

3 (2.5)

1 (0.5)

3 (7.1)

Primary

67/391 (17.1)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

24 (19.8)

34 (15.5)

9 (21.4)

Secondary

197/391 (50.4)

0 (0.0)

5 (71.4)

59 (48.8)

117 (53.2)

16 (38.1)

University/higher

120/391 (30.7)

1 (100.0)

2 (28.6)

35 (28.9)

68 (30.9)

14 (33.3)

Private health insurance,

n

(%)

Yes

279 (70.5)

1 (100.0)

7 (100.0)

85 (69.1)

161 (72.2)

25 (59.5)

No

117 (29.5)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

38 (30.9)

62 (27.8)

17 (40.5)

Insurance includes drug reimbursement,

n

or

n

/

n

(%)

301/368 (81.8)

1 (100.0)

5 (71.4)

97/113 (85.8) 174/216 (80.6)

24/31 (77.4)

Employment status,

n

(%)

Full time

159 (40.2)

1 (100.0)

5 (71.4)

56 (45.5)

74 (33.2)

23 (54.8)

Part time

13 (3.3)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

3 (2.4)

9 (4.0)

1 (2.4)

Not employed/retired

224 (56.6)

0 (0.0)

2 (28.6)

64 (52.0)

140 (62.8)

18 (42.9)

Presenting characteristics

BMI,

n

or

n/n

(%)

25 to

<

30 kg/m

2

145/395 (36.7)

1 (100.0)

3 (42.9)

37 (30.1)

91/222 (41.0)

13 (31.0)

30 kg/m

2

199/395 (50.4)

0 (0.0)

2 (28.6)

71 (57.7)

101/222 (45.5)

25 (59.5)

Metabolic syndrome (ATP III),

n

or

n/n

(%)

205/380 (53.9)

0 (0.0)

1 (14.3)

62/121 (57.2) 125/210 (59.5)

17/41 (41.5)

Physical inactivity,

b

n

(%)

227 (57.3)

1 (100.0)

3 (42.9)

65 (52.8)

134 (60.1)

24 (57.1)

Current smoker,

c

n

(%)

53 (13.4)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

13 (10.6)

39 (17.5)

1 (2.4)

Regular alcohol consumption,

n

(%)

87 (22.0)

1 (100.0)

2 (28.6)

20 (16.3)

56 (25.1)

8 (19.0)

SBP

140 mmHg and/or DBP

90 mmHg,

n

(%)

196 (49.5)

0 (0.0)

3 (42.9)

56 (45.5)

120 (53.8)

17 (40.5)

Diabetes mellitus (type 1 or 2),

n

(%)

258 (65.2)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

109 (88.6)

149 (66.8)

0 (0.0)

Diabetes mellitus (type 2),

n

or

n

/

n

(%)

253/395 (64.1)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

106 (86.2)

147/222 (66.2)

0 (0)

Dyslipidaemia (diagnosis or history) (physician defined),

n

(%)

390 (98.5)

1 (100.0)

7 (100.0)

122 (99.2)

219 (98.2)

41 (97.6)

Family history of CVD,

d

n

(%)

151 (38.1)

1 (100.0)

3 (42.9)

30 (24.4)

100 (44.8)

17 (40.5)

Hypertension (diagnosed/history of),

n

(%)

322 (81.3)

0 (0.0)

2 (28.6)

99 (80.5)

190 (85.2)

31 (73.8)

Familial hypercholesterolaemia,

e

n

/

n

(%)

8/130 (6.2)

0 (0.0)

0/6 (0.0)

1/56(1.8)

7/67 (10.4)

NA

Medical history

CAD (documented),

n

(%)

135 (34.1)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

135 (60.5)

0 (0.0)

ACS/MI,

n

(%)

88 (22.2)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

88 (39.5)

0 (0.0)

Stroke (any),

n

(%)

15 (3.8)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

15 (6.7)

0 (0.0)

Peripheral artery disease,

n

(%)

18 (4.5)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

18 (8.1)

0 (0.0)

Congestive heart failure,

n

(%)

13 (3.3)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

1 (0.8)

12 (5.4)

0 (0.0)

Chronic kidney disease (GFR

<

60 ml/min/1.73 m

2

),

n

(%)

27 (6.8)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

27 (12.1)

0 (0.0)

ACS: acute coronary syndrome; ATP: Adult Treatment Panel; BMI: body mass index; CAD: coronary artery disease; CVD: cardiovascular disease; DBP: diastolic

blood pressure; GFR: glomerular filtration rate; MI: myocardial infarction; NA: not available; SBP: systolic blood pressure; SD: standard deviation.

a

Patients without a serious pathology, classifying them as very high or high cardiovascular risk, and in whom the SCORE could not be calculated owing to missing data.

b

Subject is not regularly involved in moderate (walking/cycling/gardening) or strenuous exercise (jogging/football/vigorous swimming) for

four hours each week.

c

Individuals who smoked any tobacco in the previous 12 months or who quit during past year.

d

Coronary and/or vascular disease

<

55 years of age in male and

<

60 years in female first-degree relatives.

e

Dutch Lipid Clinics criteria: definite or probable.