Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  44 / 74 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 44 / 74 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 30, No 2, March/April 2019

110

AFRICA

conditions. However, the smokers had significantly higher

oxygen saturation during the hypoxic exposure, but lower

oxygen saturation in the post-hypoxic period. They also had

higher mean heart rate (HR) during the whole session compared

to the non-smokers. HRV analysis showed that SDNN was

higher in non-smokers in the pre-hypoxic period but not during

hypoxia. RMSSD, SD1, SD2 and SD1/SD2 were higher in the

non-smokers during all three periods of the test. Sample entropy

was higher in the group of non-smokers under normoxic but not

hypoxic conditions (Table 2).

Frequency domain HRV analysis showed higher TP in the

non-smokers only during the pre-hypoxic period. HF was lower

in the smokers under both normoxic and hypoxic conditions.

LF was also lower but only during the pre-hypoxic normoxia.

Non-smokers had a lower LF/HF index under normoxic (pre-

and post-hypoxia) conditions but no significant difference was

found during hypoxic exposure (Fig. 1).

When comparing intra-group changes of HRV when shifting

from hypoxic to post-hypoxic (normoxic) conditions, we found

that there was a significant increase in SDNN, RMSSD and HF

and a decrease in LF/HF, but these changes were observed in

only the group of non-smokers (Table 3). Peak frequency for HF

at the three different stages of the study was as follows: before

(0.21

±

0.06 ms

2

), during (0.21

±

0.07 ms

2

) and after hypoxia (0.21

±

0.05 ms

2

) and did not show significant difference (

p

=

1.000).

Discussion

When comparing groups of smokers and non-smokers under

normoxic conditions before hypoxic exposure, there was no

difference in the oxygen saturation, but smokers had significantly

higher heart rates and lower HRV. This means that tobacco

smoking leads to a decrease in the overall variability (total power

and SDNN), lower vagal activity (RMSSD, HF and SD1),

sympathetic predomination (higher LF/HF and lower SD1/SD2)

(Fig. 1) and lower complexity of the time series (sample entropy).

Impaired autonomic regulation in smokers has been studied

previously. Manzano

et al

. found that smoking a single cigarette

is a stress for the body and leads to a sudden change in

autonomic control, associated with sympathetic activation and

vagal withdrawal. These changes could be observed up to 30

minutes after smoking.

7

In our study, we tried to avoid the effect

of acute tobacco smoking, therefore our subjects did not smoke

for at least two hours prior to the test. We were thus able to assess

the long-term consequences caused by smoking.

The results of our study are in concordance with other

investigations who found impaired autonomic control with lower

HRV parameters in ‘heavy’ smokers with more than 15 pack-

years.

8,9

Although our subjects were much younger and with

less pack-years, we found the same HRV pattern. Even without

any clinical signs and symptoms, smokers had sympathetic

predominance (higher LF/HF and lower SD1/SD2). HRV

could therefore be used in clinical practice for the assessment of

impaired autonomic control in young smokers. Moreover, some

studies have shown that HRV parameters significantly increased

and LF/HF decreased after smoking cessation, which clearly

demonstrates the benefit of cessation.

17

When comparing the groups during exogenous hypoxic

exposure, we found that smokers had higher SpO

2

and HR, but

significantly lower HRV parameters (RMSSD, HF, SD1, SD2,

SD1/SD2), which means higher sympathetic activation as a

result of hypoxic provocation. Sympathetic over-activation or

higher SpO

2

in smokers could not be a result of higher ventilation

compared to non-smokers since nicotine does not increase the

peripheral chemoreceptor sensitivity and there was no difference

in the peak frequency of HF, which suggests no difference in the

respiratory rate of the two groups.

12,18

Moreover, it is well known

that chronic hypoxia causes pulmonary vasoconstriction and

pulmonary hypertension, which leads to ventilation/perfusion

mismatch and remodelling of the pulmonary vessels.

19,20

Brewer

et al.

demonstrated that smoking workers of Leadville,

Colorado (3 048 m) had higher haemoglobin affinity with oxygen

compared to non-smokers, most probably caused by the higher

levels of carboxyhaemoglobin, which shift the oxygen dissociation

curve to the left.

21,22

This could be a possible explanation for the

higher SpO

2

of smokers during hypoxia but not during normoxia,

since the difference in the oxygen dissociation curve of the

two groups was higher in lower pO

2

(high altitude).

23

However,

carboxyhaemoglobin levels were not part of the study design and

further tests are needed to confirm this hypothesis.

Wu

et al

. showed no difference in SpO

2

between smokers and

non-smokers at 4 525 m. However the authors concluded that

smoking slightly decreased the risk of acute mountain sickness

Table 3. Comparison of HRV parameters between hypoxic and normoxic

(post-hypoxic) conditions in smokers and non-smokers

Parameters

Non-smokers

Smokers

Hypoxia

Post-

Hypoxia

p

-value Hypoxia

Post-

Hypoxia

p

-value

HR (beat/min) 65.1

±

11.1 61.9

±

9.0 0.001 77.3

±

13.8 74.5

±

13.5 0.033

SDNN (ms)

75.7

±

41.1 87.8

±

39.2 0.055 57.9

±

28.1 61.3

±

25.3 0.656

RMSSD (ms) 65.9

±

40.2 75.1

±

45.9 0.011 34.3

±

17.1 34.9

±

20.0 0.914

lnLF (ms

2

)

7.6

±

1.1 7.6

±

0.9 0.963 7.1

±

0.9 7.0

±

0.8 0.983

lnHF (ms

2

)

6.8

±

1.4 7.2

±

1.3 0.014 5.8

±

1.2 5.8

±

1.1 0.912

lnTP (ms

2

)

8.2

±

1.2 8.5

±

0.9 0.099 7.9

±

1.0 7.9

±

0.9 0.785

LF/HF

3.0

±

2.3 1.9

±

1.5 < 0.001 3.8

±

1.6 4.0

±

1.8 0.657

HF: high frequency, HR: heart rate, LF: low frequency, SDNN: standard deviation

of the intervals between normal beats, RMSSD: mean square root of successive R-R

interval differences, TP: total power.

Periods

Pre-hypoxia

Hypoxia

Post-hypoxia

LF/HF index

8

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

0

Non-smokers

Smokers

Error bars: 95% CI

Fig. 1.

Comparison of LF/HF index between smokers and

non-smokers under normoxic and hypoxic conditions.