Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  60 / 70 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 60 / 70 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 30, No 5, September/October 2019

302

AFRICA

discovery of PCSK9 as a protein that influences LDL receptor

turnover, a therapeutic strategy was developed based on this

action. Although the polygenic nature of FH has been identified

and contributes to the understanding of this clinical phenotype

with high cardiovascular risk, it is possible that more monogenic

causes may be found.

Ideally, a genetic basis should be sought in all patients with

a clinical suspicion of FH, either for a monogenic disorder or

a polygenic form of the disease using a condensed six-SNV

genetic risk score (

CELSR2/SORT1

,

APOB

,

ABCG5/8

,

LDLR

,

and two SNPs in

APOE

). An outline for a diagnostic approach

through genetic testing is presented in Fig. 3. In South Africa,

founder effects may lead to identification of a large number

of patients with a few selected mutations by more traditional

methods, but next-generation sequencing technologies such as

WES offer more extensive screening. In cases where monogenic

FH is excluded, confirmation of polygenic FH would indicate

that cascade genetic testing for identification of affected family

members would not be cost effective. In the remainder of FH

patients without an identifiable mutation, or high polygenic risk

score, additional research for a causal mutation in novel and

unknown gene(s) may be justified.

Much work needs to be done in South Africa for the detection

of monogenic and polygenic FH as a phenotype. The application

of the single-nucleotide variants to the polygenic FH risk score

needs to be confirmed or adapted, to be reliable in populations

with ancestry other than European.

Discussion

The recognition of hypercholesterolaemia and coronary artery

disease in South Africa dates back many years. Prof K Steyn

indicated that Dr Jan Pretorius already drew attention to

dyslipidaemia when it was being recognised by Prof Harry

Seftel with the diagnosis of so many homozygous FH patients

in the region of Johannesburg. Prof Steyn also described work

done at the MRC. In a rural study of Afrikaners and testing

hypercholesterolaemia above the 80th percentile, the prevalence

of FH assessed by the three known mutations in the

LDLR

gene

was one in 72.

The genetic investigation as well as counselling for FH was

discussed. Ms M Schoeman, an experienced HPCSA-registered

genetic counsellor working in Cape Town, indicated that she had

few referrals for counselling and these predominantly related to

inheritance in Afrikaners.

Prof Talmud indicated that founder effects made the detection

of LDL receptor mutations somewhat easier and that next-

generation sequencing could simultaneously provide information

on all FH-associated genes as well as on the genes operating

in polygenic FH. However, in the latter case, the utility of the

polymorphisms used in Europe needs to be established before

applying this set to local dyslipidaemias.

Prof Kotze mentioned that medical schemes controlling

expense for healthcare could consider supporting the analysis

of SNVs, which could identify polygenic FH. This could be

incorporated as part of a pre-screen algorithm for selection of

patients eligible for WES.

The need to develop a local gene score for polygenic FH

was emphasised by Prof Humphries. Prof Raal indicated that

a genetic investigation of six common mutations in the LDL

receptor would be of great help in the diagnosis of FH since there

are strong founder effects in South Africa. Such a diagnostic

service is not available at teaching hospitals. Mutations specific

to regions and ancestral lineage could be selected to make the

genetic diagnosis more cost effective.

The cost of treatment was discussed briefly. The practical

point is that the medical practitioner treats the phenotype

with medication to certain targets, as indicated by the South

African guidelines.

19

The generic statins have made the treatment

much more affordable. Prof Marais indicated atorvastatin and

rosuvastatin should be preferred in the treatment of FH. The

cost of the 80-mg daily dose of atorvastatin is in the range of

Severe FH patients

Bile acid sequestrant

PCSK9 inhibitor

Statin

? Niacin

? Fibrate

Apheresis

Mipomersen

Lomitapide

Cholesterol-absorption

inhibitor

Initiation of high-intensity statin

monotherapy is standard of care

Ezetimibe is added when patient

is not at LDL-C threshold

Bile acid sequestrants, ? fibrates and

niacin care are added alone or in

combination for those not at LDL threshold

Apheresis for patients on maximally

tolerated therapy and LDL-C > 7.8 mmol/l

or CAD LDL-C > 5.2 mmol/l.

Mipomersen and lomitapide for HoFH

Add a PCSK9 inhibitor

Fig. 4.

Treatment strategies for FH.