Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  19 / 64 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 19 / 64 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 31, No 3, May/June 2020

AFRICA

127

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that evaluates

cardiac function detected by TDI echocardiography in premature

children after ROP treatment with either anti-VEGF or LPC.

There has been great concern about these new agents due to

their toxic side effects. There are reports of associated systemic

side effects from systemic anti-VEGF agents used in cancer

therapy, such as systemic hypertension, thromboembolism and

LV dysfunction. They are also reported to have several side

effects secondary to intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy, including

systemic hypertension, congestive heart failure, proteinuria,

arterial thromboembolic events, and systemic haemorrhage,

which are linked to cardiovascular toxicities.

16,17

On the other

hand, Scott

et al.

published a commentary about anti-VEGF

agents and the data suggested no difference in the risk of

arteriothrombotic effect or death between anti-VEGF agents.

18

A recent meta-analysis showed 23.6% incidence of all grades

and a 7.9% incidence of high-grade hypertension after systemic

bevacizumab treatment.

19

In the present study, systolic and diastolic blood pressure and

heart rate values in infants were found to be similar to those in the

control group. Development of the blood vessels, vascular growth

and organogenesis are extremely VEGF-dependent, as was

demonstrated with early embryonic lethality caused by a deletion

of the VEGF gene in the signalling pathway.

20

VEGF also has a

role in pathological blood vessel growth (macular degeneration),

tumoural vasculature growth and normal physiological

vasculature growth (menstrual cycle).

21

The endothelium is an

active endocrine organ secreting many cytokines and growth

factors and interacting with cells that affect the function of many

organs such as the heart, kidneys, liver and brain.

After the introduction of intravitreal VEGF treatment,

these agents now have a key role in the treatment of ROP.

Compared to conventional laser therapy, anti-VEGF agents have

some advantages. Although conventional laser therapy led to a

persistent destruction of the peripheral retina, it was shown that

the development of peripheral retinal vessels continued after the

treatment with intravitreal anti-VEGF agents. Due to their ease

of use, these agents are preferred above other treatment options.

Studies demonstrate that by allowing vasculature to develop

further anteriorly and rapidly, intravitreal anti-VGEF treatment

causes less visual loss and fewer refractive errors.

22

In contrast

to the requirement for general anaesthesia in laser therapy,

these agents can be introduced only under topical anaesthesia.

23

They allow the development of the posterior retina and foveal

avascular zone and support the more immediate regression of

ROP than laser treatment.

24,25

Belcik

et al.

reported a significant increase in LV wall thickness

and mass, a decrease in end-diastolic diameter in accordance

with concentric hypertrophy, and they showed a reduction

in thickening fraction and stroke volume over the five-week

anti-VEEF treatment.

26

In our study, we did not observe any

statistically significant differences in LV M-mode measurements,

ejection fraction or fractional shortening between the groups.

MAPSE is another useful evaluation parameter and reduced

MAPSE implies impaired longitudinal function in patients with

various cardiovascular diseases.

27

Our study demonstrated lower

MAPSE values in the IVA and LPC groups, and TAPSE values

were similar. Advanced imaging techniques such as speckle-

tracking methods are needed to prove that reduced MAPSE

values show systolic dysfunction, because MAPSE provides

only LV long-axis systolic performance, whereas other systolic

parameters were in the normal range.

To assess ventricular diastolic function, Doppler data have

an important role to depict distinct patterns of abnormality in

ventricular filling, abnormal relaxation and restrictive filling.

Abnormal relaxation is especially common in disorders producing

myocardial hypertrophy. In such cases, atrioventricular early

filling velocity is decreased and the atrial component of filling

becomes potent.

28

In our study, we observed statistically significant differences

in only both ventricles’ ‘pulsed’ Doppler echocardiography

parameters between the groups, except in E velocity derived

from RV inflow. The IVA and LPC groups had significantly

higher tricuspid E velocity than the control group. It is also

known that during inspiration and apnoea, RV inflow velocities

are significantly higher. Although the E wave represents the

early, rapid-filling period of diastole, higher E-velocity values

of tricuspid inflow were more difficult to interpret than the

impaired relaxation of the right ventricle alone without the E/A

ratio change.

29

Due to such limitations on load conditions, heart rate and

age, which may influence conventional Doppler parameters, TDI

has a major potential in the diagnosis of diastolic ventricular

dysfunction.

30

When diastolic ventricular relaxation is slowed,

prolongation of the isovolumetric relaxation time and a slight

increase in the systolic velocity can be observed.

The MPI is a more specific tissue Doppler parameter for

diastolic dysfunction. In their animal experiment after the anti-

VEGF therapy, using endocardial TDI, Belcik

at al

. reported a

mild decrease in S

and E

velocities that were not statistically

significant.

26

Various paediatric and adult studies have described

subclinical impairment of systolic function with changes in

MPI, isovolumetric contraction and relaxation time.

31

In our

LPC

IVA Control

Aortic strain

25

20

15

10

5

0

16.20

16.70

22.50

LPC

IVA Control

Aortic disensibility

14

12

10

8

6

4

2

0

8.20

8.00

11.60

LPC

IVA Control

Aortic stiffness

4.0

3.5

3.0

2.5

2.0

1.5

1.0

0.5

0

3.40

3.60

2.20

Fig. 2.

Comparison of elastic parameters of the ascending aorta of patients and controls.

A

B

C