Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  7 / 67 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 7 / 67 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Vol 24, No 2, March 2013

AFRICA

5

Editorial

Impact of HIV on the incidence of pre-eclampsia

J MOODLEY

Pre-eclampsia, a condition unique to human pregnancy, is

defined as new-onset hypertension (BP

140/90 mmHg) in the

second half of pregnancy, associated with significant proteinuria

(

30 mgms). The aetiology of this condition remains elusive

but recent findings suggest that pre-eclampsia is a two-stage

disorder. The first stage is thought to be due to failure of the spiral

arterioles in the placental bed to undergo vascular remodelling

into wide-bore channels. This vascular maladaptation of the

placental bed results in a marked reduction in blood flow to the

placenta and sets the scene for the second stage.

Reduction in blood flow to the placenta induces cellular

hypoxia, which results in the release of trophoblastic debris,

necrotic tissue and a variety of anti-angiogenic circulating

factors such as soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 and soluble

endoglin. It is believed that these excessive anti-angiogenic

factors bind with pro-angiogenic factors (vascular endothelial

factor and placental growth factors), inhibiting their biological

activities and subsequently resulting in widespread endothelial

damage and the clinical disorder of pre-eclampsia.

1

The current view of the pathophysiology of pre-eclampsia

as described above is that this pregnancy disorder is a multi-

organ endothelial disorder. Therefore it is important to recognise

that although hypertension and proteinuria are the dominant

clinical signs, pre-eclampsia may present with signs of isolated

thrombocytopenia, liver enzyme abnormalities, intra-uterine

foetal growth restriction or seizures. The exact cause however

remains unknown and management is based on delaying delivery

long enough for the foetus to mature, and expediting delivery of

the placenta to avoid significant maternal and neonatal morbidity

and mortality.

2

However, what is generally not recognised is that hypertension

may get worse following delivery or that women may present

with hypertension for the first time in the immediate postpartum

period (usually the first 72 hours following delivery). This is

thought to reflect mobilisation of fluid accumulated in the extra-

vascular space following delivery.

Minimal rises inbloodpressureoccur innormal pregnanciesbut

more than one-third of pre-eclamptics have sustained high blood

pressures in the puerperium and they may also develop pulmonary

oedema. The clinical implications of this is that close monitoring

of blood pressure levels must continue following delivery and it

may be safer to keep all pre-eclamptics in hospital for at least

three days to detect any early signs of complications and take

timeous measures to prevent maternal morbidity and mortality.

3

The initiator of the vascular maladaptation is not known but

it is believed that immunological abnormalities may be involved.

Similarly, HIV is an immune-dysfunction disorder and in the

initial stages of this infection, when few symptoms are present,

there may be a slight depression in CD

4

T cells.

4

It is plausible

that the impaired immunity associated with HIV could lower the

risk of pre-eclampsia. The current data on this matter however,

are conflicting.

5,6

Kalumba

et al

. took a different approach from earlier studies

to establish whether HIV infection had a protective effect on

the incidence of pre-eclampsia.

7

These authors performed a

retrospective case–control study by comparing HIV rates in

pre-eclamptics and normotensive healthy women. Previous

studies have just compared the rate of pre-eclampsia between

uninfected and HIV-infected pregnant women.

5,8,9

Kalumba

et

al.

found a lower rate of HIV infection in pre-eclamptics in

comparison to a control group.

7

This study suggests that the rates of pre-eclampsia are

lower in HIV-positive pregnant women. Because this study

was retrospective and CD

4

counts were not available for a large

number of the study patients, there is a need for a prospective

study involving large numbers of patients to confirm the findings

of Kalumba

et al

.

7

J MOODLEY, MD,

jmog@ukzn.ac.za

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology; Women’s Health

and HIV Research Group, Department of Obstetrics and

Gynaecology, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South

Africa

References

1.

Ramesar SV, Mackraj I, Gathiram P, Moodley J. Sildenafil citrate

decreases sFlt-1 and sEng in pregnant I-NAME treated Sprague-

Dawley rats.

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol

2011;

157

(2): 136–140.

Doi.10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.03.005.

2.

Moodley J for the National Committee on Confidential Enquiries

into Maternal Deaths. Maternal deaths associated with hypertension

in South Africa: lessons to learn from the Saving Mothers Report

2005–2007.

Cardiovasc J Afr

2010;

21

(6): 10–14.

3.

Smith M, Waugh J, Nelson-Piercy C. Management of postpartum hyper-

tension.

Obstet Gynaecol

. DOI;10.1111/j.1744-4667.2012.00144.x.

Accessed 14 January 2013.

4.

Naidoo K, Pupuma BSX, Moodley J. Scientific letter: Immune evalu-

ation of HIV-infected and noninfected pre-eclamptics.

S Afr Fam Pract

2010;

52

(2): 159–160.

5.

Mattar R, Abes M A, Prescill CL, Nelson S,

et al.

Pre eclampsia and

HIV infection.

Eur J Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Biol

2004;

117

: 240–241.

6.

Hall D. Is pre-eclampsia common in patients with HIV / AIDS?

Reprod

Immunol

2007;

76

: 75–77.

7.

Kalumba VM, Moodley J, Naidoo, TD. Is the prevalence of pre-

eclampsia affected by HIV/AIDS? A retrospective case-controlled

study.

Cardiovasc J Afr

2013;

23

(2): 24–27.

8.

Suy A, Martinez E, Coll O, Lonca M, Palcio M, De Lazzari EA.

Increased risk of pre-eclampsia and fetal death in HIV infected women

receiving HAART.

AIDS

2006;

20

: 59–66.

9.

Frank KA, Buchmann EJ, Schackis R. Does HIV infection protect against

pre-eclampsia/eclampsia?

Obstet Gynecol

2004;

104

(2): 238–242.