CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 26, No 6, November/December 2015
210
AFRICA
Management and outcome of topical beta-blocker-
induced atrioventricular block
Kazım Serhan Özcan, Barı
ş
Güngör, Damirbek Osmonov, Ahmet
İ
lker Tekke
ş
in, Servet Altay, Ahmet
Ekmekçi, Ercan Toprak, Ersin Yıldırım, Nazmi Çalık, Ahmet Taha Alper, Kadir Gürkan,
İ
zzet Erdinler
Abstract
Background:
Topical beta-blockers have a well-established
role in the treatment of glaucoma. We aimed to investigate the
outcome of patients who developed symptomatic atrioven-
tricular (AV) block induced by topical beta-blockers.
Methods:
All patients admitted or discharged from our insti-
tution, the Siyami Ersek Training and Research Hospital,
between January 2009 and January 2013 with a diagnosis of
AV block were included in the study. Subjects using ophthal-
mic beta-blockers were recruited and followed for permanent
pacemaker requirement during hospitalisation and for three
months after discontinuation of the drug. A permanent pace-
maker was implanted in patients in whom AV block persisted
beyond 72 hours or recurred during the follow-up period.
Results:
A total of 1 122 patients were hospitalised with a
diagnosis of AV block and a permanent pacemaker was
implanted in 946 cases (84.3%) during the study period.
Thirteen patients using ophthalmic beta-blockers for the
treatment of glaucoma and no other rate-limiting drugs were
included in the study. On electrocardiography, eight patients
had complete AV block and five had high-degree AV block.
The ophthalmic beta-blockers used were timolol in seven
patients (55%), betaxolol in four (30%), and cartelol in two
cases (15%). The mean duration of ophthalmic beta-blocker
treatment was 30.1
±
15.9 months. After drug discontinuation,
in 10 patients the block persisted and a permanent pacemaker
was implanted. During follow up, one more patient required
pacemaker implantation. Therefore in total, pacemakers were
implanted in 11 out of 13 patients (84.6%). The pacemaker
implantation rate did not differ according to the type of topi-
cal beta-blocker used (
p
=
0.37). The presence of infra-nodal
block on electrocardiography was associated with higher rates
of pacemaker implantation.
Conclusion:
Our results indicate that topical beta-blockers
for the treatment of glaucoma may cause severe conduction
abnormalities and when AV block occurs, pacemaker implan-
tation is required in a high percentage of the patients.
Keywords:
beta-blockers, glaucoma, drug-induced block, pace-
maker implantation
Submitted 17/1/15, accepted 16/3/15
Cardiovasc J Afr
2015;
26
: 210–213
www.cvja.co.zaDOI: 10.5830/CVJA-2015-030
Topical beta-blockers have a well-established role in the treatment
of glaucoma and are frequently used as first-line therapy for the
reduction of associated ocular hypertension.
1,2
While systemic
concentration after administration of topical beta-blockers is
low in comparison to that achieved with oral beta-blockers,
cardiovascular, respiratory, central nervous system and metabolic
side effects may still occur.
3
Topical beta-blockers have been
shown to decrease heart rate and blood pressure in comparison
to placebo.
4
Cardiovascular effects may be augmented with
systemic combination therapy with other heart rate-blocking
agents, such as beta-blockers and calcium channel blockers.
5
In the literature, there are several case reports indicating
the possible relationship between topical beta-blockers and the
development of severe bradyarrhythmias, such as third-degree
atrioventricular (AV) block and sick sinus syndrome.
6-9
However,
little is known about the incidence and prognosis of severe
bradyarrhythmias induced by topical beta-blockers. In this
trial, we aimed to investigate the outcome of patients who were
hospitalised with a diagnosis of symptomatic AV block while
receiving topical beta-blockers.
Methods
All patients who were hospitalised in our institution, the Siyami
Ersek Training and Research Hospital, between January 2009
and January 2013 with a diagnosis of AV block or symptomatic
bradyarrhythmia were reviewed. The site of AV block was
diagnosed by surface electrocardiography, as previously
described
10-13
(Table 1). Patients who had symptomatic (fatigue,
faintness, dyspnoea and syncope) type II second- or third-degree
AV block, 2:1 AV block, atrial fibrillation with bradycardia
(average heart rate
≤
40 beats/min on 24-hour Holter monitoring)
were included in this study. Patients with vasovagal syncope,
concomitant myocardial infarction, electrolyte abnormalities or
digitalis toxicity were excluded.
Department of Cardiology, Derince Training and Research
Hospital, Kocaeli, Turkey
Kazım Serhan Özcan, MD,
serhandr@gmail.com; serhan_oz@
yahoo.comDepartment of Cardiology, Siyami Ersek Cardiovascular
and Thoracic Surgery Centre, Istanbul, Turkey
Barı
ş
Güngör, MD
Ahmet
İ
lker Tekke
ş
in, MD
Servet Altay, MD
Ahmet Ekmekçi, MD
Ercan Toprak, MD
Ersin Yıldırım, MD
Nazmi Çalık, MD
Ahmet Taha Alper, MD
Kadir Gürkan, MD
İ
zzet Erdinler, MD
Department of Cardiology, Almaty Sema Hospital, Almaty,
Kazakhstan
Damirbek Osmonov, MD