Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  57 / 74 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 57 / 74 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 29, No 5, September/October 2018

AFRICA

319

somewhat neglected component of tobacco usage with regard to

pro-inflammatory activity. Recently, however, nicotine has been

reported to possess endothelial disruptive, pro-inflammatory

activity,

42

while exposure of isolated human blood neutrophils

to nicotine

in vitro

has been reported to activate NETosis,

which was augmented by the combination of nicotine with

either TNF-

α

or APCA.

43

In this same study, administration

of nicotine to mice was found to accelerate collagen-induced

arthritis, which was accompanied by increased systemic levels

of myeloperoxidase-DNA complexes, an

in vivo

surrogate of

NETosis.

43

Moreover, chronic inhalation of nicotine by mice has

been found to cause pulmonary injury associated with increased

expression of pulmonary cytokines and proteases, mimicking the

features of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

44

Notwithstanding a high content of heavy metal toxicants,

cured tobacco also contains high levels of pro-inflammatory

microbial products, particularly bacterial endotoxins.

10,45

Endotoxins, which are potent activators of vascular endothelium,

neutrophils, monocytes/macrophages and platelets, as well as

other types of immune/inflammatory and structural cells, have

also been implicated in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis.

46,47

In this context, users of smokeless tobacco products may be

particularly vulnerable to the pro-atherogenic effects of tobacco-

derived endotoxins, since these are inhaled or ingested without

modification by the combustion of tobacco. The impact of

tobacco use in the context of RA disease progression and

associated co-morbidity is often neglected by both patient and

clinician, even though globally, a high percentage of patients

with RA continue to smoke.

10,48

Effects of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic

drug and cytokine-targeted therapies on clini-

cal and systemic indices of CVD in patients

with RA

Methotrexate (MTX) is the pivotal traditional disease

modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) and has a proven

track record for the cost-effective management of RA. In

addition, MTX increases total cholesterol (TC), low-density

lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein

cholesterol (HDL-C) and triglyceride levels in RA, which might

be attributed to the decrease in inflammation.

24

MTX treatment

has been found to reduce mortality rate in RA patients by 70%

and showed a decrease of 21% in total cardiovascular risk,

including myocardial infarctions, congestive cardiac failure and

strokes.

49

This information confirms the belief that if systemic

inflammation in RA is reduced, the risk for CVD is also reduced.

It is therefore important to achieve remission or low disease

activity as soon as possible, not only to achieve better structural

and functional outcomes, but also to reduce the risk of CVD in

these patients.

49

As alluded to above, TNF-

α

is pivotally involved in the

pathogenesis of RA and is one of the main targets in the

treatment of the disease. Anti-TNF biologics are now standard

in the treatment of refractory RA. The main agents used in this

group are etanercept, adalimumab, infliximab and golimumab.

Treatment of RA with anti-TNF biologics may decrease CVD

risk by inhibiting endothelial dysfunction, and the progression of

atherosclerosis by decreasing the expression of pro-inflammatory

cytokines and endothelial adhesion molecules.

No changes in the levels of LDL-C or the ratio between

HDL-C and TC were found with long-term treatment of RA

patients with these immunotherapies. However, evidence derived

from clinical studies shows that TNF inhibitors can reduce

the risk for cardiovascular events between 30 and 70% in RA

patients.

Non-TNF biologics such as tocilizumab (TCZ), tofacitinib,

rituximab, abatacept and anakinra act on different arms of the

immune system and also demonstrate clinical efficacy in RA,

but little is known about the effects of these drugs on CVD

morbidity and mortality rates. In this context, evidence from a

limited number of clinical studies has indicated that lipid profiles

tend to alter when RA patients are treated with these drugs, but

results are inconclusive and more research is needed.

50

An important albeit unanswered question is ‘can the

remarkable advances in the management of RA be used to

manage patients with non-RA associated CVD?’ In this context,

an unmet need in the management of patients with CVD is

subclinical or ‘residual’ inflammatory risk, despite addressing

other cardiovascular risk factors, in the management of patients

with CVD. The identification of inflammatory mediators or

other biomarkers associated with cardiovascular risk has the

potential to stratify at-risk patients and develop novel therapies

for CVD in general.

51

In this context, it is noteworthy that studies

in cholesterol-fed rats have demonstrated anti-atherosclerotic

effects of MTX,

52,53

while several clinical trials are currently

exploring the role of anti-rheumatic drugs such as MTX and

IL-1 antagonists as novel therapies for non-RA CVD.

54,55

Conclusion

Cardiovascular co-morbidity has a significant impact on overall

prognosis in the management of patients with RA. It is important

to emphasise that classical risk factors for CVD are common in

RA patients and their treatment is as important as in the general

population. Controlling disease activity with aggressive and

early introduction of conventional DMARDs with escalation to

targeted or biologic therapies if required will enable control of

inflammation and lower the CVD burden.

References

1.

Van Vollenhoven RF. Sex differences in rheumatoid arthritis: more than

meets the eye…

BMC Med

2009;

7

: 12.

2.

Dadoun S, Zeboulon-Ktorza N, Combescure C, Elhai M, Rozenberg S,

Gossec L,

et al.

Mortality in rheumatoid arthritis over the last fifty years:

systematic review and meta-analysis.

Joint Bone Spine

2013;

80

(1): 29–33.

3.

Widdifield J, Bernatsky S, Paterson JM, Tomlinson G, Tu K, Kuriya

B,

et al.

Trends in excess mortality among patients with rheumatoid

arthritis in Ontario, Canada.

Arthritis Care Res

2015;

67

(8): 1047–1053.

4.

Avouac J, Amrouche F, Meune C, Rey G, Kahan A, Allanore Y

.

Mortality profile of patients with rheumatoid arthritis in France and its

change in 10 years.

Semin Arthritis Rheum

2017;

46

(5): 537–543.

5.

Humphreys JH, Warner A, Chipping J, Marshall T, Lunt M, Symmons

DP,

et al.

Mortality trends in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis

over 20 years: results from the Norfolk Arthritis Register.

Arthritis Care

Res

2014;

66

(9): 1296–1301.

6.

Pincus T, Gibson KA, Block JA. Premature mortality: a neglected

outcome in rheumatic diseases?

Arthritis Care Res

2015;

67

(8): 1043–

1046.