Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  52 / 74 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 52 / 74 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 30, No 2, March/April 2019

118

AFRICA

ence to oral anticoagulant and factors that influence the international

normalized ratio stability.

Rev Latino-Am Enfermagem

2011;

19

(1):

18–25.

6.

Corotto PS, McCarey MM, Adams S, Khazanie P, Whellan DJ. Heart

failure patient adherence: epidemiology, cause, and treatment.

Heart Fail

Clin

2013;

9

(1): 49–58. doi: 10.1016/j.hfc.2012.09.004.

7.

Riegel B. I forgot: memory and medication adherence in heart failure.

Circ Heart Fail

2016;

9

(12). pii: e003642

8.

LamWY, FrescoP.Medication adherencemeasures: an overview.

BioMed

Res Int

2015;

2015

: 217047,

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/217047.

9.

Nguyen TM, La Caze A, Cottrell N. What are validated self-report

adherence scales really measuring? a systematic review.

Br J Clin

Pharmacol

2014;

7

(3): 427–445. doi: 10.1111/bcp.12194. PMCID:

PMC3952718.

10. Morisky DE, DiMatteo MR. Improving the measurement of self-

reported medication nonadherence: final response.

J Clin Epidem

2011;

64

(3): 255–257.

11. Morisky DE, Ang A, Krousel-Wood M, Ward HJ. Predictive valid-

ity of a medication adherence measure in an outpatient setting.

J Clin

Hypertens

(Greenwich) 2008;

10

(5): 348–354.

12. Jankowska-Pola

ń

ska B, Chudiak A, Uchmanowicz I, Dudek K, Mazur

G. Selected factors affecting adherence in the pharmacological treat-

ment of arterial hypertension.

Patient Prefer Adherence

2017;

11

:

363–371. doi:10.2147/PPA.S127407.

13. Morisky DE, DiMatteo MR. Improving the measurement of self-

reported medication nonadherence: final response

. J Clin Epidem

2011;

64

: 258–263.

14. Culig J, Leppée M. From Morisky to Hill–Bone; self-reports scales for

measuring adherence to medication.

Coll Antropol

2014;

38

(1): 55–62.

15. Kim MT, Hill MN, Bone LR, Levine DM. Development and testing

of the Hill–Bone compliance to high blood pressure therapy scale.

Prog

Cardiovasc Nurs

2000;

15

(3): 90–96. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7117.2000.tb00.

16. Uchmanowicz I, Jankowska-Pola

ń

ska B, Chudiak A, Szyma

ń

ska-

Chabowska A, Mazur G. Psychometric evaluation of the Polish adap-

tation of the Hill–Bone Compliance to High Blood Pressure Therapy

Scale.

BMC Cardiovasc Disord

2016;

16

: 87. doi: 10.1186/s12872-016-

0270-y.

17. Ma C, Chen S, You L, Luo Z, Xing C. Development and psychometric

evaluation of the Treatment Adherence Questionnaire for Patients with

Hypertension.

J Adv Nurs

2012;

68

(6): 1402–1413. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-

2648.2011.05835.x.

18. Svarstad BL, Chewning BA, Sleath BL, Claesson C. The Brief

Medication Questionnaire: a tool for screening patient adherence and

barriers to adherence.

Patient Educ Couns

1999;

37

(2): 113–124.

19. Lahdenperä TS, Wright CC, Kyngäs HA. Development of a scale to

assess the compliance of hypertensive patients.

Int J Nurs Stud

2003;

40

(7): 677–684.

20. Fongwa MN, Nandy K, Yang Q, Hays RD. The facilitators of and

barriers to adherence to hypertension treatment scale.

J Cardiovasc Nurs

2015;

30

(6): 484–490. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000206.

21. Risser J, Jacobson TA, Kripalani S. Development and psychometric

evaluation of the Self- efficacy for Appropriate Medication Use Scale

(SEAMS) in low-literacy patients with chronic disease.

J Nurs Meas

2007;

15

(3): 203–219.

22. Patel SI, Cherington C, Scherber R,

et al

. Assessment of patient adher-

ence to direct oral anticoagulant vs warfarin therapy.

J Am Osteopath

Assoc

2017;

117

(1): 7–15. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.2017.002.

23. Jankowska-Pola

ń

ska B, Lomper K, Alberska L, Jaroch J, Dudek K,

Uchmanowicz I. Cognitive function and adherence to anticoagulation

treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation.

J Geriatr Cardiol

2016;

13

(7): 559–565. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2016.07.006.

24. Castellucci LA, Shaw J, van der Salm K,

et al.

Self-reported adherence

to anticoagulation and its determinants using the Morisky medication

adherence scale.

Thromb Res

2015;

136

(4): 727–731. doi: 10.1016/j.

thromres.2015.07.007. Epub 2015 Jul 14.

25. Laliberté F, Bookhart BK, Nelson WW,

et al

. Impact of once-daily

versus twice-daily dosing frequency on adherence to chronic medica-

tions among patients with venous thromboembolism.

Patient

2013;

6

(3):

213–224. doi: 10.1007/s40271-013-0020-5.

26. Laliberté F, Nelson WW, Lefebvre P, Schein JR, Rondeau-Leclaire J,

Duh MS. Impact of daily dosing frequency on adherence to chronic

medications among nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients.

Adv Ther

2012;

29

(8): 675–690. doi: 10.1007/s12325-012-0040-x.

27. Brown JD, Shewale AR, Talbert JC. Adherence to rivaroxaban, dabi-

gatran, and apixaban for stroke prevention in incident, treatment-naïve

nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.

J Manag Care Spec Pharm

2016;

22

(11):

1319–1329.

28. Cano SJ, Lamping DL, Bamber L, Smith S. The Anti-Clot Treatment

Scale (ACTS) in clinical trials: cross-cultural validation in venous

thromboembolism patients.

Health Qual Life Outcomes

2012;

10

: 120.

doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-10-120.

29. Prins MH, Bamber L, Cano SJ,

et al

. Patient-reported treatment satis-

faction with oral rivaroxaban versus standard therapy in the treatment

of pulmonary embolism; results from the EINSTEIN PE trial.

Thromb

Res

2015;

135

(2): 281–288. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2014.11.008.

30. Bamber L, Wang MY, Prins MH,

et al.

Patient-reported treatment satis-

faction with oral rivaroxaban versus standard therapy in the treatment

of acute symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis.

Thromb Haemost

2013;

110

(4): 732–741.

31. Meyer S, Frei CR, Daniels KR,

et al

. Impact of a new method of warfa-

rin management on patient satisfaction, time, and cost.

Pharmacotherapy

2013;

33

(11): 1147–1155. doi: 10.1002/phar.1344.

32. Carris NW, Hwang AY, Smith SM,

et al

. Patient satisfaction with

extended-interval warfarin monitoring.

J Thromb Thrombolysis

2016;

42

(4): 486–493. doi: 10.1007/s11239-016-1385-9.

33. Essers BA, Prins MH. Methods to measure treatment satisfaction in

patients with pulmonary embolismor deep venous thrombosis.

Curr Opin

Pulm Med

2010;

16

(5): 437–441. doi: 10.1097/MCP.0b013e32833bde2b.

34. Wild D, Murray M, Shakespeare A, Reaney M, von Maltzahn R.

Patient-reported treatment satisfaction measures for long-term antico-

agulant therapy.

Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res

2008;

8

(3):

291–299. doi: 10.1586/14737167.8.3.291.

35. Pelegrino FM, Dantas RA, Corbi IS, da Silva Carvalho AR, Schmidt

A, Pazin Filho AJ. Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric proper-

ties of the Brazilian-Portuguese version of the Duke Anticoagulation

Satisfaction Scale.

J Clin Nurs

2012;

21

(17–18): 2509–2517. doi:

10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03869.x.

36. Samsa G, Matchar DB, Dolor RJ,

et al.

New instrument for measuring

anticoagulation- related quality of life: development and preliminary

validation.

Health Qual Life Outcomes

2004;

2

: 22.

37. Silva de Assis MC, Nascimento Cruz L, Zuchinali P, Rohde LE, Rejane

Rabelo E. Does treatment guided by vitamin K in the diet alter the qual-

ity of life of anticoagulated patients?

Nutr Hosp

2012;

27

(4): 1328–1333.

doi: 10.3305/nh.2012.27.4.5847.

38. Müller S, Kohlmann T, Wilke T. Validation of the Adherence Barriers

Questionnaire – an instrument for identifying potential risk factors asso-

ciated with medication-related non-adherence.

BMC Health Services

Res

2015;

15

: 153. doi:10.1186/s12913-015-0809-0.

39. Prins MH, Marrel A, Carita P,

et al

. Multinational development of a

questionnaire assessing patient satisfaction with anticoagulant treat-