![Show Menu](styles/mobile-menu.png)
![Page Background](./../common/page-substrates/page0021.png)
CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 31, No 4, July/August 2020
AFRICA
183
genetic ILVNC may manifest more commonly with the dilated
cardiomyopathy phenotype. However, no definitive conclusion
in this regard may be drawn until further work is conducted,
since to our knowledge no other screening studies have been
conducted in African families of subjects with ILVNC.
Echocardiography is the most commonly used technique
to diagnose ILVNC, as it is widely available, feasible and
non-invasive. However, echocardiography has several limitations,
which can lend itself to over- or under-diagnosis of ILVNC.
24,25
Echocardiography is highly dependent on the operator’s technical
skill to acquire suitable images and requires proper interpretation
of data received. There is also concern about the reproducibility
of current diagnostic criteria, which has demonstrated poor
inter-observer agreement.
26
Given these limitations, cardiac
magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has a far superior spatial
resolution, less operator dependence and higher contrast in
the myocardium, which can provide better delineation of the
trabeculations.
A cohort study done by Diwardkar
et al
. showed how
echocardiography failed to detect ILVNC in patients diagnosed
with it on MRI.
24
In our study, cardiac MRI was not utilised,
and this may have improved the diagnosis of individuals
with ILVNC in subjects who were difficult to image or where
echocardiography missed the pathology.
One of the major findings of this study was that utilising
a strategy of clinical evaluation and ECG had a sensitivity
of 76% and a specificity of 42% versus the gold standard of
echocardiographic screening. In resource-deprived settings, such
a strategy may be attractive if it is used as the initial screening
strategy and followed by echocardiographic screening with or
without genetic screening. For such a strategy to be successful,
the initial screening strategy must ideally have a very high
sensitivity, which often implies a lesser degree of specificity.
Our findings highlight the failure of using the ECG in addition
to clinical evaluation as an initial screening strategy due to its
relatively modest sensitivity. Furthermore, the role of a 12-lead
ECG as a screening tool alone for ILVNC is debatable, as there
are no specific ECG patterns to diagnose ILVNC.
In a cohort study done by Steffel
et al
.,
27
the most common
findings on initial diagnosis of ILVNC were intraventricular
conduction delay, voltage signs of LVH and repolarisation
abnormalities. A completely normal ECG was present in only
13% of patients. These abnormal ECG signs can be found in
normal African individuals. Lohrmann
et al
.
28
showed that
early repolarisation patterns occurred in 53.2% of subjects.
LVH occurred in 13% and bundle branch blocks in 0.5% of
normal black adults with echocardiographically normal hearts.
Therefore using a strategy of clinical evaluation and an ECG
in this study was inferior since the sensitivity and specificity of
results were sub-optimal for screening.
Limitations of this study were that it was a retrospective
study with a small study population and therefore the external
validity of our secondary aim was limited. Not all eligible family
members were screened. Genetic testing and cardiac MRI were
not performed.
Conclusion
Echocardiographic screening detected DCMO in 10.8% of
subjects whereas no cases of ILVNC or HCM were identified. A
strategy of clinical screening that included electrocardiography
was sub-optimal as a screening strategy compared to
echocardiographic screening in this study.
References
1.
Maron BJ, Towbin JA, Thiene G,
et al.
Contemporary definitions and
classification of the cardiomyopathies: an American Heart Association
scientific statement from the Council on Clinical Cardiology, Heart
Failure and Transplantation Committee; Quality of Care and Outcomes
Research and Functional Genomics and Translational Biology
Interdisciplinary Working Groups; and Council on Epidemiology and
Prevention.
Circulation
2006;
113
: 1807–1816.
2.
Peters F, Khandheria BK,
et al
. Isolated left ventricular noncompaction
in sub-Saharan Africa: a clinical and echocardiographic perspective.
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging
2012;
5
: 187–193.
3.
Oechslin EN, Attenhofer Jost CH, Rojas JR, Kaufmann PA, Jenni R.
Long-term follow-up of 34 adults with isolated left ventricular noncom-
paction: A distinct cardiomyopathy with poor prognosis.
J Am Coll
Cardiol
2000;
36
: 493–500.
4.
Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, Afilalo J, Armstrong A, Ernande
L,
et al.
Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by
echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of
Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular
Imaging.
J Am Soc Echocardiogr
2015;
28
: 1–39.
5.
Nagueh SF, Smiseth OA, Appleton CP, Byrd BF, Dokainish H.
ASE/EACVI guidelines. Recommendations for the evaluation of left
ventricular diastolic function by echocardiography: An update from the
American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association
of Cardiovascular Imaging.
J Am Society Echocardiogr
2016;
29
:
277–314.
6.
Rudski LG, Lai WW, Afilalo J, Hua L, Handschumacher MD,
Chandrasekaran K,
et al.
Guidelines for the echocardiographic assess-
ment of the right heart in adults: a report from the American
Society of Echocardiography endorsed by the European Association
of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of
Cardiology, and the Canadian Society of Echocardiography.
J Am Soc
Echocardiogr
2010;
23
: 685–713.
7.
Stöllberger C, Winkler-Dworak M, Blazek G, Finsterer J. Prognosis
of left ventricular hypertrabeculation/noncompaction is dependent
on cardiac and neuromuscular comorbidity.
Int J Cardiol
2007;
121
:
189–193.
8.
Pinto YM, Elliott PM, Arbustini E,
et al
. Proposal for a revised defini-
tion of dilated cardiomyopathy, hypokinetic non-dilated cardiomyopa-
thy, and its implications for clinical practice: a position statement of the
ESC working group on myocardial and pericardial diseases.
Eur Heart
J
2016;
37
(23): 1850–1858.
9.
Elliott PM, Anastasakis A, Borger MA,
et al
. 2014 ESC guidelines
on diagnosis and management of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: the
Task Force for the Diagnosis and Management of Hypertrophic
Cardiomyopathy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).
Eur
Heart J
2014;
35
(39): 2733–2779.
10. Aras D, Tufekcioglu O, Ergun K, Ozeke O, Yildiz A, Topaloglu S,
et al.
Clinical features of isolated ventricular noncompaction in adults: long-
term clinical course, echocardiographic properties, and predictors of left
ventricular failure.
J Card Fail
2006;
12
: 726–733.
11. Chin TK, Perloff JK, Williams RG, Jue K, Mohrmann R. Isolated
noncompaction of left ventricular myocardium. A study of eight cases.
Circulation
1990;
82
: 507–513.
12. Espinola-Zavaleta N, Soto ME, Castellanos LM, Jativa-Chavez S,