Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  21 / 62 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 21 / 62 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 31, No 4, July/August 2020

AFRICA

183

genetic ILVNC may manifest more commonly with the dilated

cardiomyopathy phenotype. However, no definitive conclusion

in this regard may be drawn until further work is conducted,

since to our knowledge no other screening studies have been

conducted in African families of subjects with ILVNC.

Echocardiography is the most commonly used technique

to diagnose ILVNC, as it is widely available, feasible and

non-invasive. However, echocardiography has several limitations,

which can lend itself to over- or under-diagnosis of ILVNC.

24,25

Echocardiography is highly dependent on the operator’s technical

skill to acquire suitable images and requires proper interpretation

of data received. There is also concern about the reproducibility

of current diagnostic criteria, which has demonstrated poor

inter-observer agreement.

26

Given these limitations, cardiac

magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has a far superior spatial

resolution, less operator dependence and higher contrast in

the myocardium, which can provide better delineation of the

trabeculations.

A cohort study done by Diwardkar

et al

. showed how

echocardiography failed to detect ILVNC in patients diagnosed

with it on MRI.

24

In our study, cardiac MRI was not utilised,

and this may have improved the diagnosis of individuals

with ILVNC in subjects who were difficult to image or where

echocardiography missed the pathology.

One of the major findings of this study was that utilising

a strategy of clinical evaluation and ECG had a sensitivity

of 76% and a specificity of 42% versus the gold standard of

echocardiographic screening. In resource-deprived settings, such

a strategy may be attractive if it is used as the initial screening

strategy and followed by echocardiographic screening with or

without genetic screening. For such a strategy to be successful,

the initial screening strategy must ideally have a very high

sensitivity, which often implies a lesser degree of specificity.

Our findings highlight the failure of using the ECG in addition

to clinical evaluation as an initial screening strategy due to its

relatively modest sensitivity. Furthermore, the role of a 12-lead

ECG as a screening tool alone for ILVNC is debatable, as there

are no specific ECG patterns to diagnose ILVNC.

In a cohort study done by Steffel

et al

.,

27

the most common

findings on initial diagnosis of ILVNC were intraventricular

conduction delay, voltage signs of LVH and repolarisation

abnormalities. A completely normal ECG was present in only

13% of patients. These abnormal ECG signs can be found in

normal African individuals. Lohrmann

et al

.

28

showed that

early repolarisation patterns occurred in 53.2% of subjects.

LVH occurred in 13% and bundle branch blocks in 0.5% of

normal black adults with echocardiographically normal hearts.

Therefore using a strategy of clinical evaluation and an ECG

in this study was inferior since the sensitivity and specificity of

results were sub-optimal for screening.

Limitations of this study were that it was a retrospective

study with a small study population and therefore the external

validity of our secondary aim was limited. Not all eligible family

members were screened. Genetic testing and cardiac MRI were

not performed.

Conclusion

Echocardiographic screening detected DCMO in 10.8% of

subjects whereas no cases of ILVNC or HCM were identified. A

strategy of clinical screening that included electrocardiography

was sub-optimal as a screening strategy compared to

echocardiographic screening in this study.

References

1.

Maron BJ, Towbin JA, Thiene G,

et al.

Contemporary definitions and

classification of the cardiomyopathies: an American Heart Association

scientific statement from the Council on Clinical Cardiology, Heart

Failure and Transplantation Committee; Quality of Care and Outcomes

Research and Functional Genomics and Translational Biology

Interdisciplinary Working Groups; and Council on Epidemiology and

Prevention.

Circulation

2006;

113

: 1807–1816.

2.

Peters F, Khandheria BK,

et al

. Isolated left ventricular noncompaction

in sub-Saharan Africa: a clinical and echocardiographic perspective.

Circ Cardiovasc Imaging

2012;

5

: 187–193.

3.

Oechslin EN, Attenhofer Jost CH, Rojas JR, Kaufmann PA, Jenni R.

Long-term follow-up of 34 adults with isolated left ventricular noncom-

paction: A distinct cardiomyopathy with poor prognosis.

J Am Coll

Cardiol

2000;

36

: 493–500.

4.

Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, Afilalo J, Armstrong A, Ernande

L,

et al.

Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by

echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of

Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular

Imaging.

J Am Soc Echocardiogr

2015;

28

: 1–39.

5.

Nagueh SF, Smiseth OA, Appleton CP, Byrd BF, Dokainish H.

ASE/EACVI guidelines. Recommendations for the evaluation of left

ventricular diastolic function by echocardiography: An update from the

American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association

of Cardiovascular Imaging.

J Am Society Echocardiogr

2016;

29

:

277–314.

6.

Rudski LG, Lai WW, Afilalo J, Hua L, Handschumacher MD,

Chandrasekaran K,

et al.

Guidelines for the echocardiographic assess-

ment of the right heart in adults: a report from the American

Society of Echocardiography endorsed by the European Association

of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of

Cardiology, and the Canadian Society of Echocardiography.

J Am Soc

Echocardiogr

2010;

23

: 685–713.

7.

Stöllberger C, Winkler-Dworak M, Blazek G, Finsterer J. Prognosis

of left ventricular hypertrabeculation/noncompaction is dependent

on cardiac and neuromuscular comorbidity.

Int J Cardiol

2007;

121

:

189–193.

8.

Pinto YM, Elliott PM, Arbustini E,

et al

. Proposal for a revised defini-

tion of dilated cardiomyopathy, hypokinetic non-dilated cardiomyopa-

thy, and its implications for clinical practice: a position statement of the

ESC working group on myocardial and pericardial diseases.

Eur Heart

J

2016;

37

(23): 1850–1858.

9.

Elliott PM, Anastasakis A, Borger MA,

et al

. 2014 ESC guidelines

on diagnosis and management of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: the

Task Force for the Diagnosis and Management of Hypertrophic

Cardiomyopathy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).

Eur

Heart J

2014;

35

(39): 2733–2779.

10. Aras D, Tufekcioglu O, Ergun K, Ozeke O, Yildiz A, Topaloglu S,

et al.

Clinical features of isolated ventricular noncompaction in adults: long-

term clinical course, echocardiographic properties, and predictors of left

ventricular failure.

J Card Fail

2006;

12

: 726–733.

11. Chin TK, Perloff JK, Williams RG, Jue K, Mohrmann R. Isolated

noncompaction of left ventricular myocardium. A study of eight cases.

Circulation

1990;

82

: 507–513.

12. Espinola-Zavaleta N, Soto ME, Castellanos LM, Jativa-Chavez S,