CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Vol 24, No 2, March 2013
AFRICA
45
in the PLATO results where ticagrelor
significantly reduced the combined
endpoints of cardiovascular death, myo-
cardial infarction and stroke.
‘Importantly, the overall risk reduc-
tion was not only driven by a myocar-
dial infarction rate reduction as was the
experience in the CURE study, but also
by a reduction in cardiovascular death
and all-cause mortality (Fig. 2). ‘While
the overall risk of experiencing an
event was higher in medically managed
patients who formed 36% of the total
PLATO cohort, ticagrelor treatment also
reduced the composite endpoints in this
important group of patients’, Dr Wheat-
croft noted.
Finally, in terms of today’s third cri-
teria of safety, the additional benefits
of ticagrelor did not come at the price
of increased bleeding, as there was no
significant difference in major bleed-
ing rates between the clopidogrel- and
ticagrelor-treated patients in the PLATO
study (Fig. 2). Non-coronary artery
bypass graft (CABG)-
related major bleeds were
more common in ticagre-
lor-treated patients, while
CABG-related
bleeding
rates were similar with
both agents.
While dyspnoea is an
important side effect, it
is typically mild, resulting
in a less than 1% discon-
tinuation rate in the PLATO
study. ‘In our own clinical
experience, this dyspnoea
is certainly mild and tran-
sient and, with appropriate
reassurance, patients can
continue with the medica-
tion’, Dr Wheatcroft con-
cluded.
clopidogrel requires a two-step bio-
transformation in the liver to its active
metabolite, thereby allowing genetic
polymorphisms to influence the reliability
of the antiplatelet response. Ticagrelor is
direct acting and its effect is independ-
ent of genetic polymorphisms, ensuring
a consistent inhibition of platelet activity.
Ticagrelor also produces a greater
inhibition of platelet aggregation than
clopidogrel. The more reliable platelet
inhibition with ticagrelor (180 mg load-
ing dose, then 90 mg bid) was seen
Dr Stephen
Wheatcroft
Fig. 2.
PLATO main endpoints.
New era in antiplatelet therapy
Is clopidogrel adequate in 2013?
There is a good evidence base . . .
that ticagrelor offers significant advantages
over clopidogrel
“
”
I
n reviewing oral anti-platelet therapy
for acute coronary syndromes today,
clinicians would most likely demand
that any acceptable therapy meet at least
three criteria and provide:
• rapid onset of action
• reproducible and reliable inhibition
of platelet activation
• acceptable risk of bleeding.
Adhering to today’s standard, Dr Ste-
phen Wheatcroft, consultant inter-
ventional cardiologist at the University
of Leeds noted that his Unit now uses
ticagrelor across the board for acute
coronary syndrome (ACS) patients, both
STEMI and NSTEMI patients. ‘There is no
doubt that clopidogrel is a good drug,
as shown in the CURE study. However,
there is also a good evidence base for
the new agents, prasugrel and tica-
grelor, and the latter offers significant
advantages over clopidogrel’, he noted.
In terms of today’s criteria, ticagre-
lor has a faster onset of action than the
other agents, as it is direct acting and
does not require
in vivo
biotransformation.
An
active metabolite is also
formed which contributes
in part to ticagrelor’s clini-
cal effect.
Reproducible and reli-
able platelet inhibition
is not a characteristic of
the clinical experience
with clopidogrel. ‘Low
responders are exposed to
a doubled risk of adverse
events compared to those
ACS patients who respond
well to clopidogrel’, Dr
Wheatcroft pointed out.
One of the reasons
for the heterogeneity of
platelet inhibition is that