Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  60 / 72 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 60 / 72 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 27, No 2, March/April 2016

114

AFRICA

associated with greater risk, and a dominantly stenotic lesion

is more likely to develop complications than patients with

predominantly incompetent valves.

Prosthetic valves

Bioprosthetic valves are associated with minimal risks during

pregnancy. Conversely, mechanical valves are associated with

significant maternal and foetal complications.

36

Mechanical

prosthetic valves are exposed to two risks during pregnancy,

namely the twin risks of thrombosis and sepsis.

The procoagulant profile of pregnancy increases the

likelihood of thrombotic events, and the need to maintain

anticoagulation while protecting the foetus from exposure to

anticoagulant drugs and preventing excessive haemorrhage at

the time of delivery are contradictory therapeutic aims.

37

The use

of warfarin outside of pregnancy is both simple and cheap, with

monitoring of anticoagulant effects made easy by measurement

of the INR. In pregnancy, warfarin crosses the placenta and

leads to embryopathy, foetal anticoagulation and an increased

risk of pregnancy loss in all three trimesters. The alternative

treatment with heparin protects the foetus from direct harm

by anticoagulating only the mother; however, unfractionated

heparin is only reliably used as an intravenous infusion and the

use of LMWH requires monitoring of anti-Xa activity to know

that the patient is in the therapeutic range.

38

Notably, data from non-pregnant studies are not applicable

to pregnancy, in which the procoagulant profile changes all the

dosing schedules if a therapeutic level of anticoagulation is to

be obtained. The contradictory literature pertaining to use of

the different anticoagulants in pregnancy has been carefully

review by Elkayam with reference to the risks of both pregnancy

and the variable probability of valve thrombosis related to

the specific prosthesis and the particular valve replaced.

39

The

recommendations of these authors are contained in Table 1.

Of all the anticoagulants used, warfarin is the most effective

agent for preventing maternal valve thrombosis but also has

the highest risk of adverse pregnancy outcome. Consequently,

intensive counselling is required to explain the relative risks of

different treatment regimens and the anticipated complications

of each approach. Long-term heparin therapy is associated with

a risk of osteoporosis and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia;

these adverse effects are less frequently seen with LMWHs.

Both heparin and warfarin increase the risk of retroplacental

haemorrhage during pregnancy, and warfarin-exposed foetuses

in the first trimester risk the development of nasal hypoplasia

and epiphyseal calcification. Intravenous heparin may also

be complicated by line sepsis, which becomes a greater risk

with increasingly prolonged periods of intravenous drug

administration.

There is therefore no uniform opinion on how best to

approach anticoagulation in pregnancy. Many South African

units would use unfractionated heparin before 12 weeks of

gestation and after 36 weeks of pregnancy, in order to have

monitored control of anticoagulation that is also rapidly

reversible. Warfarin is used between these gestational ages

as a compromise that allows domiciliary care with ease of

administration and ready access to INR monitoring. There are

other ways of approaching anticoagulation, including the use

of continuous warfarin or continuous LMWH. In the latter

case, access to anti-Xa assays is necessary to ensure therapeutic

efficacy. The question of adjuvant therapy with aspirin has

been considered and certain advocates of LMWH routinely

combine aspirin with LMWH throughout pregnancy.

39

Bioprosthetic tissue valves are significantly less thrombogenic

than mechanical valves, and anticoagulation is not required,

unless associated arrhythmias are present.

36

Pregnancy may

be well tolerated in the presence of a normal valve structure,

normal left ventricular function and absence of other cardiac

lesions. Pregnancy risks increase when the valve does not

function normally. Tissue valves, however, degenerate over

time. In general, mitral bioprostheses degenerate faster than

aortic prostheses, and the rate of degeneration is more rapid

in women under 40 years of age.

40,41

Therefore, women of

childbearing age with bioprosthetic valves are likely to require

redo heart surgery, which is an important consideration when

discussing the choice of valve implant before pregnancy.

22

Sepsis is an ever-present risk in obstetric practice at the time

of delivery, although the rate of endocarditis varies widely in

the reported literature, from 0–10%.

42

The pyrexial pregnant

woman with prosthetic valves deserves careful evaluation

to exclude endocarditis as a diagnosis. The development of

endocarditis on mechanical prosthetic valves is commonly an

indication for valve replacement. The avoidance of sepsis is a

priority that requires strict protocols during and after labour.

These protocols include minimising the number of vaginal

examinations during labour, restricting instrumentation of the

genital tract during labour and delivery, scrupulous attention

to anti-sepsis during the conduct of labour, ensuring that

delivery of the placenta is complete, and the use of prophylactic

antibiotics.

Complicated disease

Pulmonary hypertension, diagnosed on the basis of estimated

pulmonary artery pressures, evident in increased peak

regurgitant velocity across the tricuspid valve, may follow

Table 1. Our recommended approach to anticoagulation therapy for

women with MPHV during pregnancy

Higher risk

Lower risk

Old-generation MPHV in mitral

position, MPHV in tricuspid posi-

tion, atrial fibrillation, history of TE

on heparin

New-generation MPHV in mitral

position and MPHV in aortic posi-

tion

Warfarin (INR 2.5–3.5) for 35 to 36

weeks followed by IV UFH (aPTT

>

2.5) to parturition

+

ASA 81–100

mg/day

LMWH SQ Q12 h (trough anti-Xa

0.6 IU/ml, peak anti-Xa

<

1.5 IU/

ml) to 35 to 36 weeks, then UFH IV

(aPTT > 2.0) to parturition

OR

OR

LMWH SQ Q12 h (trough anti-Xa

0.7 IU/ml, peak anti-Xa

<

1.5 IU/

ml) or UFH SQ Q12 h or IV* (mid

interval aPTT

>

2.5) for 12 weeks,

followed by warfarin (INR: 2.5–3.5)

to 35 to 36 weeks, then UFH IV

(aPTT

>

2.5) to parturition + ASA

81–100 mg/day.

LMWH SQ Q12 h (trough anti-Xa

0.6 IU/ml, peak anti-Xa

<

1.5 IU/

ml) or UFH SQ Q12 h or IV* (mid

interval aPTT

>

2.0) for 12 weeks

followed by warfarin (INR: 2.5–3.0)

until 35 to 36 weeks, then UFH IV

(aPTT

>

2.0) to parturition.

*IV preferred.

aPTT = activated partial thromboplastin time; ASA = acetylsalicylic acid;

INR = international normalised ratio; IV = intravenous; LMWH = low-

molecular-weight heparin; MPHV = mechanical prosthetic heart valve; Q

= every; SQ = subcutaneous; TE = thromboembolism; UFH = unfraction-

ated heparin.