Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  50 / 80 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 50 / 80 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 28, No 3, May/June 2017

184

AFRICA

PDW is a more specific indicator of platelet activation

than mean platelet volume in the absence of platelet swelling.

25

Elevated PDW directly measures the variability in platelet size

during platelet distension and serves as a marker of platelet

activation.

26

Increased platelet number and size, and the presence

of pseudopodia may influence PDW. Significant elevation of

PDW has been observed among patients with acute myocardial

infarction and unstable angina pectoris.

27

Jindal

et al

.

28

reported a significant association between

PDW and microvascular dysfunction among diabetic patients.

Numerous factors contribute to microvascular and circulatory

dysfunction, including coronary microvascular imbalance and

increased tonus, endothelial thickening of small vessels and

endothelial nitric oxide imbalance, and blood viscosity.

In our study, we detected higher PDW levels in patients

with MB. We assumed that a higher PDW level was related to

increased vasoactive agents, including endothelial nitric oxide

synthase, endothelin-1 and angiotensin-converting enzyme in the

proximal segment of the MB.

The NLR is related to the development of atherosclerosis

in the coronary arteries,

29

and NLR is an excellent indicator of

cardiovascular disease.

9

Among patients with acute coronary

syndrome, neutrophils are functionally activated, and the

presence of localised neutrophil infiltration in atherosclerotic

lesions has been demonstrated, assuming that neutrophils play

a key role in the mediation and destabilisation of atherosclerotic

plaques.

30

Our study demonstrated a significant correlation

between the presence of MB and NLR, an inflammatory marker

linked to early atherosclerosis.

Chronic inflammation may act synergistically to raise RDW

and augment the atherosclerotic process.

31

The RDW is an

independent predictor of mortality and coronary morbidity

among patients with myocardial infarction.

8

In our study, higher

RDW was found in patients with MB than in the control group.

The relationship between cardiovascular disease and

increased platelet activity is well known. In this study, we found

a significant relationship between MB and PDW, an established

indicator of platelet activity. Additionally, we found a significant

relationship between MB and NLR, an indicator of systemic

inflammation. These predictive parameters are easily measured

and are inexpensive in routine clinical practice.

There were some limitations to this study. We evaluated the

coronary arteries using coronary angiography. Although it is well

known that intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) provides a more

accurate evaluation of coronary atherosclerosis, we were unable

to perform IVUS assessments.

Coronary atherosclerosis is present anatomically in

approximately 25% of patients, based on autopsy and computed

tomography (CT), but results in angiographically detectable

systolic compression in less than 10% of patients. Cardiac CT

angiography may be a useful tool to more precisely detect MB,

however, we were unable to perform cardiac CT angiography in

this study. In addition, the study data are reflective of the cross-

sectional design and may not reflect the long-term clinical status

of the patients.

Conclusion

To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to evaluate

the relationship between MB and indirect inflammatory markers.

Our study reveals a significant association between indirect

inflammatory markers and MB. Further studies are needed to

clarify the relationship between MB and indirect inflamatory

markers.

References

1.

Mohlenkamp S, Hort W, Ge J, Erbel R. Update on myocardial bridging.

Circulation

2002;

106

: 2616–2622.

2.

Bourassa MG, Butnaru A, Lesperance J, Tardif JC. Symptomatic

myocardial bridges: overview of ischemic mechanisms and current diag-

nostic and treatment strategies.

J Am Coll Cardiol

2003;

41

: 351–359.

3.

Alegria JR, Herrmann J, Holmes DR Jr, Lerman A, Rihal CS.

Myocardial bridging.

Eur Heart J

2005;

26

: 1159–1168.

4.

Gowda RM, Khan IA, Ansari AW, Cohen RA. Acute ST segment eleva-

tion myocardial infarction from myocardial bridging of left anterior

descending coronary artery.

Int J Cardiol

2003;

90

: 117–118.

5.

Ural E, Bildirici U, Çelikyurt U, Kilic T, Sahin T, Acar E,

et al

. Long-

term prognosis of non-interventionally followed patients with isolated

myocardial bridge and severe systolic compression of the left anterior

descending coronary artery.

Clin Cardiol

2009;

32

: 454–457.

6.

Herve P, Humbert M, Sitbon O, Parent F, Nunes H, Legal C,

et al.

Pathobiology of pulmonary hypertension: the role of platelets and

thrombosis.

Clin Chest Med

2001;

22

: 451–458.

7.

Tonelli M, Sacks F, Arnold M, Moye L, Davis B, Pfeffer M. Relation

between red blood cell distribution width and cardiovascular event rate

in people with coronary disease.

Circulation

2008;

117

: 163–168.

8.

Dabbah S, Hammerman H, Markiewicz W, Aronson D. Relation

between red cell distribution width and clinical outcomes after acute

myocardial infarction.

Am J Cardiol

2010;

105

: 312–317.

9.

Kaya H, Ertas F, Islamoglu Y, Kaya Z, Atılgan ZA, Çil H,

et al

.

Association between neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and severity of

coronary artery disease.

Clin Appl Thromb Hemost

2014;

20

: 50–54.

10. Lang RM, Bierig M, Devereux RB, Flachskampf FA, Foster E,

Pellikka PA,

et al

. Recommendations for chamber quantification.

Eur J

Echocardiogr

2006;

7

: 79–108.

11. Judkins MP. Selective coronary arteriography. I. A percutaneous trans-

femoral technic.

Radiology

1967;

89

: 815–824.

12. Erbel R, Ge J, Mohlenkamp S. Myocardial bridging: a congenital vari-

ant as an anatomic risk factor for myocardial infarction?

Circulation

2009;

120

: 357–359.

13. Yano K, Yoshino H, Taniuchi M, Kachi E, Shimizu H, Watanuki A,

et

al

. Myocardial bridging of the LAD in acute inferior wall myocardial

infarction.

Clin Cardiol

2001; 24

: 202–208.

14. Tauth J, Sullebarger JT. Myocardial infarction associated with myocar-

dial bridging: case history and review of the literature.

Cath Cardiovasc

Diagn

1997;

40

: 364–367.

15. Marchionni N, Chechi T, Falai M, Margheri M, Fumagalli S.

Myocardial stunning associated with a myocardial bridge.

Int J Cardiol

2002;

82

: 65–67.

16. Feld H, Guadanino V, Hollander G, Greengart A, Lichstein E, Shani J.

Exercise-induced ventricular tachycardia in association with a myocar-

dial bridge.

Chest

1991;

99

: 1295–1296.

17. Den Dulk K, Brugada P, Braat S, Heddle B, Wellens HJ. Myocardial

bridging as a cause of paroxysmal atrioventricular block.

J Am Coll

Cardiol

1983;

1

: 976–969.

18. Tio RA, van Gelder IC, Boonstra PW, Crijns HJ. Myocardial bridg-

ing in a survivor of sudden cardiac near-death: role of intracoronary

Doppler flow measurements and angiography during dobutamine stress

in the clinical evaluation.

Heart

1997;

77

: 280–282.