Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  61 / 80 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 61 / 80 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 28, No 3, May/June 2017

AFRICA

195

double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

J Hypertens

2005;

23

: 2055–2061.

16. Ribeiro AB, Gavras H. Angiotensin II antagonists: clinical experience in

the treatment of hypertension, prevention of cardiovascular outcomes

and renal protection in diabetic nephropa-thy and proteinuria.

Arq Bras

Endocrinol Metabol

2006;

50

: 327–333.

17. Seçici S, Battalo

ğ

lu B, Uyar

İ

S,

et al.

Rosuvastatin pretreatment does

not attenuate microalbuminuria after coronary artery bypass grafting.

Turk Gogus Kalp Dama

2014;

22

(3): 496–501. Doi: 10.5606/tgkdc.

dergisi.2014.8991.

18. Mangano CM, Diamondstone LS, Ramsay JG, Aggarwal A, Herskowitz

A, Mangano DT. Renal dysfunction after myocardial revascularization:

risk factors, adverse outcomes, and hospital resource utilization. The

Multicenter Study of Perioperative Ischemia Research Group.

Ann

Intern Med

1998;

128

: 194–203.

19. Ramsay JG. The respiratory, renal, and hepatic systems: effect of cardiac

surgery and cardiopulmonary bypass. In: Mora CT, ed.

Cardiopulmonary

Bypass

. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1995: 147–168.

20. Ş

ener T, Köprülü A

Ş

, Karpuzo

ğ

lu OE,

et al

. The clinical results of

off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery in renal dysfunction patients.

Turk Gogus Kalp Dama

2013;

21

(4): 918–923. Doi: 10.5606/tgkdc.

dergisi.2013.8168.

21. Loef BG, Epema AH, Navis G, Ebels T, van Oeveren W, Henning RH.

Off-pump coronary revascularization attenuates transient renal damage

compared with on-pump coronary revascularization.

Chest

2002;

121

:

1190–1194.

22. Morariu AM, Loef BG, Aarts LP, Rietman GW, Rakhorst G, van

Oeveren W,

et al

. Dexamethasone: benefit and prejudice for patients

undergoing on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: a study on

myocardial, pulmonary, renal, intestinal, and hepatic injury.

Chest

2005;

128

: 2677–2687.

23. Bugra O, Baysal A, Fedakar A, Erdem K, Sunar H, Daglar B. Does

serum neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin biomarker detect the

early deterioration in renal functions in patients with insulin-dependent

diabetes mellitus undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery?

Turk Gogus Kalp Dama

2014;

22

(1): 63–70. Doi: 10.5606/tgkdc.dergi-

si.2014.7780.

24. Borch-Johnsen K, Kreiner S. Proteinuria: value as predictor of cardio-

vascular mortality in insulin dependent diabetes mellitus.

Br Med J

1987;

294

: 1651–1654.

25. Montalescot G, Collt JP. Preserving cardiac function in the hyperten-

sive patient: why renal parameters hold the key.

Eur Heart J

2005;

26

:

2616–2622.

Non-O blood groups associated with higher risk of heart attack

Having a non-O blood group is associated with a higher risk

of heart attack, according to research presented recently at

Heart Failure 2017 and the 4th World Congress on Acute Heart

Failure.

Lead author Tessa Kole, a Master’s degree student at the

University Medical Centre Groningen, the Netherlands, said: ‘It

has been suggested that people with non-O blood groups (A, B,

AB) are at higher risk for heart attacks and overall cardiovascular

mortality, but this suggestion comes from case–control studies,

which have a low level of evidence. If this was confirmed, it could

have important implications for personalised medicine.’

The current study was a meta-analysis of prospective

studies reporting on O and non-O blood groups, and incident

cardiovascular events, including myocardial infarction (heart

attack), coronary artery disease, ischaemic heart disease, heart

failure, cardiovascular events and cardiovascular mortality.

The study included 1 362 569 subjects from 11 prospective

cohorts, described in nine articles. There were a total of 23 154

cardiovascular events. The researchers analysed the association

between blood group and all coronary events, combined

cardiovascular events and fatal coronary events.

The analysis of all coronary events included 771 113 people

with a non-O blood group and 519 743 people with an O

blood group, of whom 11 437(1.5%) and 7 220 (1.4%) suffered

a coronary event, respectively. The odds ratio (OR) for all

coronary events was significantly higher in carriers of a non-O

blood group, at 1.09 [95% confidence interval (CI) of 1.06–1.13].

The analysis of combined cardiovascular events included 708

276 people with a non-O blood group and 476 868 people with

an O blood group, of whom 17 449 (2.5%) and 10 916 (2.3%)

had an event, respectively. The OR for combined cardiovascular

events was significantly higher in non-O blood group carriers, at

1.09 (95% CI 1.06–1.11).

The analysis of fatal coronary events did not show a

significant difference between people with O and non-O blood

groups.

‘We demonstrate that having a non-O blood group is

associated with a 9% increased risk of coronary events and a

9% increased risk of cardiovascular events, especially myocardial

infarction’, said Ms Kole.

The mechanisms that might explain this risk are under

study. The higher risk for cardiovascular events in non-O blood

group carriers may be due to having greater concentrations of

von Willebrand factor, a blood clotting protein which has been

associated with thrombotic events. Further, non-O blood group

carriers, specifically those with an A blood group, are known

to have higher cholesterol. And galectin-3, which is linked to

inflammation and worse outcomes in heart failure patients, is

also higher in those with a non-O blood group.

Ms Kole said: ‘More research is needed to identify the cause

of the apparent increased cardiovascular risk in people with a

non-O blood group. Obtaining more information about risk in

each non-O blood group (A, B and AB) might provide further

explanations of the causes.’

She concluded: ‘In future, blood group should be considered

in risk assessment for cardiovascular prevention, together with

cholesterol, age, sex and systolic blood pressure. It could be that

people with an A blood group should have a lower treatment

threshold for dyslipidaemia or hypertension, for example. We

need further studies to validate if the excess cardiovascular risk

in non-O blood group carriers may be amenable to treatment.’

Source:

European Society of Cardiology Press Office