Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  11 / 74 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 11 / 74 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 29, No 6, November/December 2018

AFRICA

343

References

1.

Carabello BA, Zile MR, Tanaka R, Cooper G. Left ventricular hyper-

trophy due to volume overload versus pressure overload.

Am J Physiol

1992;

263

: H1137–44.

2.

Harpole DH, Jones RH. Serial assessment of ventricular performance

after valve replacement for aortic stenosis.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg

1990;

99

: 645–650.

3.

Monrad ES, Hess OM, Murakami T, Nonogi H, CorinWJ, Krayenbuehl

HP. Time course of regression of left ventricular hypertrophy after

aortic valve replacement.

Circulation

1988;

77

: 1345–1355.

4.

Ali A, Patel A, Ali Z, Abu-Omar Y, Saeed A, Athanasiou T,

et al

.

Enhanced left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement

in patients with aortic stenosis is associated with improved long-term

survival.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg

2011;

142

: 285–291.

5.

The Criteria Committee of the New York Heart Association.

Nomenclature and Criteria for Diagnosis of Diseases of the Heart and

Great Vessels.

9th edn. Boston: Little, Brown & Co, 1994: 253–256.

6.

Baumgartner H, Hung J, Bermejo J, Chambers JB, Evangelista A,

Griffin BP,

et al

. Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis: EAE/

ASE recommendations for clinical practice

. J Am Soc Echocardiogr

2009;

22

: 1–23.

7.

Skjaerpe T, Hegrenaes L, Hatle L. Noninvasive estimation of valve area

in patients with aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound and two dimen-

sional echocardiography.

Circulation

1985;

72

: 810–818.

8.

Devereux RB, Alonso DR, Lutas EM, Gottlieb GJ, Campo E, Sachs

I,

et al

. Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy:

comparison to necropsy findings.

Am J Cardiol

1986;

57

: 450–458.

9.

Callahan MJ, Tajik AJ, Su-Fan Q, Bove AA. Validation of instanta-

neous pressure gradients measured by continuous wave Doppler in

experimentally induced aortic stenosis.

Am J Cardiol

1985;

56

: 989–993.

10. Folland ED, Parisi AF, Moynihan PF, Jones DR, Feldman CL, Tow

DE. Assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes by

real-time, two-dimensional echocardiography. A comparison of cinean-

giographic and radionuclide techniques.

Circulation

1979;

60

: 760–766.

11. Drelinski GR. Identification of left ventricular hypertrophy: Chest

roentgenography, echocardiography and electrocardiography.

Am J Med

1983;

75

(3A): 47–50.

12. Kurnik PB, Innerfield M, Wachspress JD, Eldredge WJ, Waxman HL.

Left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement measured

by ultrafast computed tomography.

Am Heart J

1990;

120

: 919–927.

13. Lund O, Kristensen LH, Baandrup U, Hansen OK, Nielsen TT,

Emmertsen K,

et al

. Myocardial structure as a determinant of pre and

postoperative ventricular function and long-term prognosis after valve

replacement for aortic stenosis.

Eur Heart J

1998;

19

: 1099–1108.

14. Zarco P. Aortic stenosis.

Eur Heart J

2003;

24

: 133–135.

15. Antonini-Canterin F, Zuppiroli A, Popescu BA, Granata G, Cervesato

E, Piazza R,

et al

. Effect of statins on the progression of bioprosthetic

aortic valve degeneration.

Am J Cardiol

2003;

92

: 1479–1482.

16. De Paulis R, Sommariva L, Colagrande L, De Matteis GM, Fratini S,

Tomai F,

et al

. Regression of left ventricular hypertrophy after aortic

valve replacement for aortic stenosis with different valve substitutes.

J

Thorac Cardiovasc Surg

1998;

116

: 590–598.

17. Maselli D, Pizio R, Bruno LP, Di Bella I, De Gasperis C. Left ventricu-

lar mass reduction after aortic valve replacement: Homografts, stentless

and stented valves.

Ann Thorac Surg

1999;

67

: 966–971.

18. Christakis GT, Joyner CD, Morgan CD, Fremes SE, Buth KJ, Sever JY,

et al

. Left ventricular mass regression early after aortic valve replace-

ment.

Ann Thorac Surg

1996;

62

: 1084–1089.

19. Jin XY, Gibson DG, Yacoub MH, Pepper JR. Perioperative assessment

of aortic homograft, Toronto stenless valve, and stented valve in the

aortic position.

Ann Thorac Surg

1995;

60

: S395–401.

20. González-Juanatey JR, García-Acuña JM, Vega Fernandez M, Amaro

Cendón A, Castelo Fuentes V, García-Bengoechea JB,

et al.

Influence

of the size of aortic valve prostheses on hemodynamics and change in

left ventricular mass: Implications for the surgical management of aortic

stenosis.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg

1996;

112

: 273–280.

21. Botzenhardt F, Eichinger WB, Guenzinger R, Bleiziffer S, Wagner I,

Bauernschmitt R,

et al.

Hemodynamic performance and incidence of

patient-prosthesis mismatch of the complete supraannular Perimount

magna bioprosthesis in the aortic position.

Thorac Cardiovasc Surg

2005;

53

: 226–230.

22. Levy D, Garrison RJ, Savage DD, Kennel WB, Castelli WP. Prognostic

implication of echocardiographically determined left ventricular mass

in the Framingham heart study.

N Eng J Med

1990;

322

: 1561–1566.

23. Lund O, Erlandsen M, Dorup I, Emmertsen K, Flo C, Jensen FT.

Predictable changes in left ventricular mass and function during ten

years after valve replacement for aortic stenosis.

J Heart Valve Dis

2004;

13

: 357–368.

24. Cakici M, Durdu S, Inan B, Yazicioglu L, Sirlak M, Eryilmaz S,

et al

.

Changes in left ventricular function and geometry after aortic valve

replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis.

Turk Gogus Kalp

Dama

2013;

21

(2): 284–293. Doi: 10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2013.6999.

25. Tasca G, Vismara R, Fiore GB, Mangini A, Romagnoni C, Pelenghi

S,

et al

. Fluid-dynamic results of

in vitro

comparison of four peri-

cardial bioprostheses implanted in small porcine aortic roots

. Eur J

Cardiothorac Surg

2015;

47

: e62–67.

26. Sutton M, Plappert T, Spiegel A, Raichlen J, Douglas P, Reichek N,

et

al

. Early postoperative changes in left ventricular chamber size, architec-

ture, and function in aortic stenosis and regurgitation and their relation

to intraoperative changes in afterload: A prospective two-dimensional

echocardiographic study.

Circulation

1987;

76

: 77–89.

27. Diab M, Faerber G, Bothe W, Lemke S, Breuer M, Walther M,

Doenst T. Sizing strategy is a major determinant of postoperative

pressure gradients in commonly implanted stented tissue valves.

Eur J

Cardiothorac Surg

2013;

44

: e289–294.

28. Bozok S, Kestelli M, Sahin A, Kara H, Gunes T, Ozpak T,

et al

. Surgical

method for facilitation of aortic valve replacement: Intraoperative applica-

tion of external pressure for increasing the transverse axis of aortic annulus.

World J Cardivasc Surg

2015;

5

: 108–113. Doi: 10.4236/wjcs.2015.510017.

29. Carroll JD. Regression of myocardial hypertrophy: Electrocardiographic

echocardiographic correlation after aortic valve replacement in patient

with chronic aortic regurgitation.

Circulation

1982;

65

: 980–987.

30. Gokalp O, Besir Y, Iner H, Yilik L, Gurbuz A. What are the parameters

showing improvement after the prosthetic valve implantation for aortic

stenosis?

Turk Gogus Kalp Dama

2017;

25

: 164–165. Doi: 10.5606/tgkdc.

dergisi.2017.13939.