Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  50 / 78 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 50 / 78 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 30, No 1, January/February 2019

48

AFRICA

stenting (stenting after thrombus aspiration without balloon

pre-dilatation) was performed in 51.9% of the patients with

IC administration and in 53.7% of those treated with IV

administration (

p

=

0.851).

Angiographic outcome is presented inTable 4. Post-procedural

TIMI flow grade was similar in both groups, with achievement

of a TIMI 3 flow grade in 89.7% of patients with IC and in 89%

of those with IV administration (

p

=

0.747). Post-procedural

MBG 3 was obtained in 62.8% of patients with IC and in 63.4%

of those with IV administration (

p

=

0.235). An MBG

2 was

more frequently obtained with IC versus IV administration

(89.7 vs 81.7%), but this did not reach statistical significance (

p

=

0.148).

There was no difference between patients randomised to IC

and IV abciximab with regard to ST-segment resolution rate.

ST-segment resolution

70% was achieved in 36 of 78 patients

with IC versus 30 of 82 patients with IV abciximab bolus (46.1

vs 36.6%,

p

=

0.368). Partial ST-segment resolution was achieved

in 28 of 78 versus 31 of 82 patients (35.9 vs 37.8%,

p

=

0.368).

No resolution was observed in 14 of 78 versus 21 of 82 patients

(17.9 vs 25.6%,

p

=

0.368) with IC and IV abciximab bolus,

respectively.

In-hospital outcome: major cardiac events are listed in Table

5. Occurrence of death, recurrent myocardial infarction and

target revascularisation rates within 30 days were similar in the

two groups. There were three deaths in each group (mortality

rate: 3.8%). MACE occurred in six of 78 patients given the IC,

and seven of 82 patients given the IV abciximab bolus (7.6 vs

8.5%,

p

=

0.410). One stroke occurred in each group, and two

patients in the IC and nine in the IV group developed renal

failure (2.5 vs 10.9 %,

p

=

0.414).

Major bleeding complications occurred in one patient in

the IC group and none in the IV group. Minor bleeding

complications occurred in seven of 78 patients given IC versus

eight of 82 patients given the IV abciximab bolus (9.3 vs 9.9%,

p

=

0.578). Thrombocytopenia occurred in five of 78 patients with

IC versus three of 82 patients with IV abciximab (6.4 vs 3.7%,

p

=

0.414).

Short-term clinical outcome: after the one-month follow

up, there was only one cardiac death in each group, one stent

thrombosis in the IC group, and similar rates of MACE in both

groups (2.66 vs 2.53%,

p

=

0.588). Also, there was no difference

in mortality rate (one death in the IV group), stent thrombosis

(one in the IC group) and MACE (5.9 vs 8.8%,

p

=

0.714) after

six months of follow up.

Discussion

This study was intended to assess the potential benefit of IC over

IV abciximab administration after manual thrombus aspiration

in patients undergoing primary PCI for STEMI. It showed that

distal, intralesional IC administration of abciximab through the

aspiration catheter following aspiration thrombectomy did not

provide additional benefit over IV administration of the drug.

Among 160 patients randomised to either IC or IV

abciximab bolus, no significant difference between the two

groups was observed. Baseline clinical characteristics of patients,

symptom-to-balloon time, which impacts on MBG,

25

coronary

angiography findings, infarct-related coronary artery, target

vessel and procedural characteristics were similar in the two

groups. Reperfusion parameters including the primary outcome

endpoint, ST-segment resolution, and the secondary endpoint,

achievement of MBG grade

2, did not differ between the

groups. Also, no difference was observed with regard to the rate

of MACE and major bleeding.

Over the past decade, several approaches have been used to

prevent or reverse the no-reflow phenomenon. This included

aspiration thrombectomy and intralesional administration of

glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors via dedicated perfusion catheters

to achieve higher concentration of the drug at the coronary

vascular bed in order to improve myocardial reperfusion and to

reduce infarct size.

Initial results from the Thrombus Aspiration during

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Acute Myocardial

Infarction (TAPAS) trial suggested that aspiration

thrombectomy could be effective in improving revascularisation

at the microvascular level.

7

Also, a meta-analysis of randomised

trials, including 3 996 patients, showed improved myocardial

perfusion, as assessed by ST-segment resolution and MBG.

8

However, aspiration thrombectomy was subsequently challenged

by the results of two trials, Thrombus Aspiration in ST-elevation

Table 3. Procedural characteristics

Variables

All

patients,

n

=

160

IV abcix-

imab,

n

=

82

IC abcix-

imab,

n

=

78

p

-value

Radial access,

n

(%)

116 (72.5) 57 (69.5) 59 (75.6) 0.385

Aspiration thrombectomy,

n

(%) 130 (81.3) 68 (82.9) 62 (79.5) 0.577

Predilatation,

n

(%)

49 (30.6) 29 (35.4) 20 (25.6) 0.182

Direct stenting,

n

(%)

83 (51.9) 44 (53.7) 39 (50)

Delayed stenting,

n

(%)

58 (36.3) 28 (34.1) 30 (38.5) 0.851

UFH 5 000 IU,

n

(%)

135 (84.4) 75 (91.5) 60 (76.9) 0.011

UFH 2 500 IU,

n

(%)

25 (15.6)

7 (8.5)

18 (23.1)

Clopidogrel 300 mg,

n

(%)

13 (18.1)

6 (7.3)

7 (9)

Clopidogrel 600 mg,

n

(%)

147 (91.9) 76 (92.7) 71 (91)

0.701

Abciximab IV perfusion,

n

(%)

112 (70)

64 (78)

48 (61.5) 0.074

UFH: unfractioned heparin.

Table 4. Angiographic outcomes

Variables

All patients,

n

=

160

IV abcix-

imab,

n

=

82

IC abcix-

imab,

n

=

78

p

-value

Post-procedural TIMI flow:

0,

n

(%)

3 (1.9)

1 (1.2)

2 (2.6)

0.747

2,

n

(%)

14 (8.8)

8 (9 .8)

6 (7.7)

3,

n

(%)

143 (89.4)

73 (89)

70 (89.7)

Post-procedural MBG:

0,

n

(%)

8 (5)

4 (4.9)

4 (5.1)

1,

n

(%)

15 (9.4)

11 (13.4)

4 (5.1)

0.235

2,

n

(%)

36 (22.5)

15 (18.3)

21 (26.9)

3,

n

(%)

101 (63.1)

52 (63.4)

49 (62.8)

MBG 0/1,

n

(%)

23 (14.4

15 (18.3)

8 (10.3)

MBG 2/3,

n

(%)

137 (85.6)

67 (81.7)

70 (89.7)

0.148

TIMI: thrombolysis in myocardial infarction; MBG: myocardial blush grade.

Table 5. Major cardiac events

Events

IV abciximab,

n

=

82

IC abciximab,

n

=

78

p

-value

Heart failure,

n

(%)

4 (4.9)

3 (3.8)

Cardiac death,

n

(%)

2 (2.4)

3 (3.8)

0.414

Non-cardiac death,

n

(%)

1 (1.2)

0 (0)

Major cardiac events,

n

(%)

7 (8.5)

6 (7.6)