Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  64 / 78 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 64 / 78 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 30, No 1, January/February 2019

62

AFRICA

Aetiologies of PH differ between high- and low-income nations,

but left heart disease (LHD) has progressively been credited to be

the most common cause of PH in contemporary clinical settings.

4,5

Despite these improvements in understanding PH aetiologies,

the condition is still diagnosed at an advanced stage in a

significant proportion of patients, due to poor medical awareness

and the paucity of symptoms in the early stages of the disease.

6

This has negative impacts on subsequent quality of life and

survival.

7

The American College of Cardiology/American Heart

Association

8

and the European Society of Cardiology/European

Respiratory Society

7

guidelines have each provided a regularly

updated diagnostic algorithm, based on prevalent aetiologies

of PH as well as availability of several diagnostic tests, and

especially, RHC in high-income countries.

This algorithmmay not apply or may be difficult to implement

in low-income countries where human and financial resources

more than just science often influence the diagnostic approach.

In sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), given the additional high and

increasing prevalence of chronic and endemic risk factors of PH,

which are almost specific to the region, such as chronic infectious

diseases (HIV, tuberculosis and schistosomiasis), hypertensive

heart disease, peripartum cardiomyopathies and rheumatic

heart disease,

9

a clear diagnostic approach to PH due to LHD

(PHLHD) is of particular importance. Furthermore, the high

cost, low availability and scarcity of expertise for RHC limit its

utility in this part of the world and justify the interest in a more

pragmatic algorithm.

Based on the experience and evidence from the Pan-African

Pulmonary Hypertension Cohort (PAPUCO) study, we

previously developed an algorithm,

10

and herein suggest a four-

step diagnostic approach for PHLHD in low-resources settings.

These steps include (1) clinical evaluation to detect predisposing

conditions for PHLHD, (2) assessment with chest X-ray (CXR)

and electrocardiogram (ECG) to uncover the presence of

PHLHD, (3) confirmation of the presence of PHLHD using

Doppler echocardiography (echo), and (4) exploration of

differential aetiologies of PHLHD and classification of the type

of PH.

Step 1: clinical evaluation and detection of a

predisposing condition

Data from the PAPUCO study

11

showed that PH should be

suspected in any African patient with otherwise unexplained

shortness of breath, fatigue, palpitations, cough, dizziness and/

or signs of right ventricular dysfunction and right heart failure.

Two-thirds of patients are likely to present in World Health

Organisation functional class (WHO FC) III or IV and one-third

may not walk further than 300 metres on a six-minute walk test.

Clinical examination may reveal a systolic murmur (57%) or a

loud P2 (41%). These clinical observations are largely similar for

men and women.

In the presence of these symptoms, clinicians should actively

inquire about predisposing conditions, which in the SSA context,

include hypertension (42%), previous or concurrent tuberculosis

(22 and 5%, respectively), indoor cooking/heating without

a chimney (32%) and HIV infection (22% overall). In the

PAPUCO study, there were no significant differences in the

risk-factor profiles of men and women besides exposure to

indoor cooking/heating without a chimney (more women),

history of smoking (more men) and alcohol abuse (more men).

Also, although being a traditional risk factor for PH, the

endemicity of schistosomiasis was only related to one case. In

some predisposing groups, such as sickle cell disease, PH signs

and symptoms may often be subtle and may not be apparent for

months as they are generally non-specific.

When the clinical evaluation is not suggestive of PH, the

clinician should search for other causes of symptoms (e.g.

tuberculosis, chronic pulmonary disease, LHD, malignancy). On

the other hand, as shown in Fig. 1, when step 1 is suggestive of

PH, the patient should systematically undergo step 2, non-invasive

investigations, which should include a CXR and ECG.

Step 2: the role of chest X-ray and electrocardiogram

Chest X-ray

In SSA where pulmonary tuberculosis and HIV-associated

chronic lung diseases are common (e.g. recurrent pneumonia,

pneumocystis pneumonia), CXR allows moderate to severe

lung diseases to be reasonably excluded but also, abnormalities

on CXR are frequent in PHLHD and after completion of TB

treatment. In the PAPUCO registry, 59% of patients presented

with cardiomegaly and 22% had prominent pulmonary arteries

(Fig. 2A).

Other findings supportive of underlying cardiac disease

include left atrial enlargement, mild to moderate pleural effusion

and cephalisation. In other circumstances, the presence of

central pulmonary arterial dilatation, which contrasts with

‘pruning’ (loss) of the peripheral blood vessels, is very suggestive

of PH. Right atrial and right ventricular (RV) enlargement may

be seen in more advanced cases.

Electrocardiogram

The diagnostic utility of ECG in patients with PH was

investigated in a sub-study of the PAPUCO registry.

11

Our

findings demonstrated that a normal ECG is very rare among

patients with PH. Sinus tachycardia and left ventricular strain

pattern were observed in around one-fifth of cases (Fig. 2B),

but PH-specific abnormalities such as p-pulmonale (14%)

and evidence of right ventricular hypertrophy (19%) were

documented in less than one-quarter of cases.

The sensitivity of ECG criteria for right heart strain ranged

between 6.2 and 47.7%, while specificity ranged between 79.3

and 100%. Negative predictive value ranged between 81.5 and

88.9%, and positive predictive value between 25 and 100%.

Positive predictive value was lowest (25%) for right bundle

branch block and QRS right-axis deviation (

100°) and highest

(100%) for QRS axis

≥ +

100°, combined with R/S ratio

1 or R

in V1

>

7 mm.

In short, signs involving PH on ECG were highly indicative of

disease, but a normal ECG would not exclude disease. Because

ECG patterns focusing on the R and S amplitude in V1 and

right-axis deviation had good specificity and negative predictive

value, their presence should trigger further investigation with

Doppler echo (Fig. 1).

Step 3: the key role of Doppler echocardiography

A transthoracic Doppler echo examination is the next and most

appropriate course of study. Doppler echo provides several