Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  68 / 78 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 68 / 78 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 30, No 1, January/February 2019

66

AFRICA

other imaging studies. It noticeable that in some patients,

several mechanisms may be involved in the pathogenesis of

PH in Africa. For example, the interaction between sickle cell

disease-related haemolysis and HIV, chronic lung disease due to

tuberculosis, schistosomiasis, and viral hepatitis could yield very

complex multifactorial and unclear PH.

Limitations of the suggested algorithm

It is important to acknowledge that a major limitation of our

approach lies in the validity of RVSP for diagnosis of PH using

Doppler echo. There is absolutely no doubt that RHC is the

standard to accurately diagnose PH and determine its severity as

well as its impact on right ventricular function. However, RHC

is an invasive procedure, and it is expensive and not available in

most low-resource settings where the majority of patients with

PH are resident, particularly in SSA.

There is abundant literature on the validity of Doppler

echo RVSP estimates in patients with left heart disease using

RHC values as the gold standard. Lanzarini

et al

.

14

reported a

concordance correlation coefficient of 0.88 between RHC and

RVSP, with ± 20 mmHg and 95% limits of agreement. In their

study of Doppler echo evaluation of haemodynamics in patients

with decompensated systolic HF, Nagueh

et al

.

15

reported

that Doppler echo identified patients with invasive systolic

pulmonary artery pressure

>

35 mmHg with 94% sensitivity and

90% specificity.

In an analysis of data from the ESCAPE trial, McClanahan

and Guglin

16

suggested that the accuracy of Doppler echo RVSP

estimates in systolic HF might be inaccurate in the presence

of right ventricular systolic dysfunction. However, at least

two reasons could have explained this lack of accuracy: first,

patients included in the ESCAPE trial

16

were in acute HF and

not haemodynamically stable; and second, echocardiography

in ESCAPE was not protocol driven, and the time differential

between RHC and RVSP evaluation using Doppler echo was

widely variable. In view of the above and provided that patients

are haemodynamically stable and a rigorous Doppler echo

technique is used by experienced observers, it is acceptable and

pragmatic to detect PH using Doppler echo estimates of RVSP,

although we recommend a confirmation with RHC before any

specific therapeutic action is required.

Finally, our recommendations are based on a single study.

Ideally, such a practice algorithm, which is intended to provide

clinicians with recommendations, should be based on systematic

review of the available evidence, and an assessment of the benefits

and harms of care options, with the intention of optimising

patient care and outcomes. However, expert opinion remains a

major part of all such practice guidelines,

17,18

particularly when

high-quality evidence is lacking, as is the case in SSA.

Conclusion

For the busy clinician, it is important to recognise the increasing

burden of PHLHD in low-resource settings and be able to make

an early diagnosis. Adopting a four-step diagnostic algorithm

is recommended and the steps include: (1) a clinical evaluation,

(2) CXR and ECG assessment, (3) Doppler echo, and (4)

exploration of differential aetiologies before classification of

the type of PH. This strategy will help manage the majority of

patients in low-resource settings, especially those with various

types of PHLHD, for which indications of RHC should be

restricted to avoid unnecessary risk.

We acknowledge the Wits/NIH Non-Communicable Diseases Leadership

Program, funded through the Fogarty International Centre of the NIH

Millennium Promise Awards: Non-Communicable Chronic Diseases Research

Training Program (NCoD) (D43), grant number:1D43TW008330-01A1.

The study and publication were partly funded by the Pulmonary Vascular

Research Institute, Bayer Healthcare and the Maurice Hatter Foundation.

References

1.

Fang JC, DeMarco T, Givertz MM, Borlaug BA, Lewis GD, Rame

JE,

et al

. World Health Organization Pulmonary Hypertension group

2: pulmonary hypertension due to left heart disease in the adult – a

summary statement from the Pulmonary Hypertension Council of the

International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation.

J Heart Lung

Transplant

2012;

31

(9): 913–933.

2.

Elliott CG, Barst RJ, Seeger W, Porres-Aguilar M, Brown LM,

Zamanian RT,

et al

. Worldwide physician education and training

in pulmonary hypertension: pulmonary vascular disease: the global

perspective.

Chest

2010;

137

(6 Suppl): 85S–94S.

3.

Bossone E, Butera G, Bodini BD, Rubenfire M. The interpretation of

the electrocardiogram in patients with pulmonary hypertension: the

need for clinical correlation. I

tal Heart J

2003;

4

(12): 850–854.

4.

Georgiopoulou VV, Kalogeropoulos AP, Borlaug BA, Gheorghiade M,

Butler J. Left ventricular dysfunction with pulmonary hypertension:

Part 1: epidemiology, pathophysiology, and definitions.

Circ Heart Fail

2013;

6

(2): 344–354.

5.

Guazzi M, Borlaug BA. Pulmonary hypertension due to left heart

disease.

Circulation

2012;

126

(8): 975–990.

6.

Van Wolferen SA, Grunberg K, Vonk Noordegraaf A. Diagnosis and

management of pulmonary hypertension over the past 100 years.

Respir

Med

2007;

101

(3): 389–398.

7.

Galie N, Hoeper MM, Humbert M, Torbicki A, Vachiery JL, Barbera

JA,

et al

. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary

hypertension: the Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of

Pulmonary Hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology

(ESC) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS), endorsed by the

International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT).

Eur

Heart J

2009;

30

(20): 2493–2537.

8.

McLaughlin VV, Archer SL, Badesch DB, Barst RJ, Farber HW,

Lindner JR,

et al.

ACCF/AHA 2009 expert consensus document

on pulmonary hypertension a report of the American College of

Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents

and the American Heart Association developed in collaboration with

the American College of Chest Physicians; American Thoracic Society,

Inc.; and the Pulmonary Hypertension Association.

J Am Coll Cardiol

2009;

53

(17): 1573–1619.

9.

Damasceno A, Mayosi BM, Sani M, Ogah OS, Mondo C, Ojji D,

et

al

. The causes, treatment, and outcome of acute heart failure in 1006

Africans from 9 countries.

Arch Intern Med

2012;

172

(18): 1386–1394.

10. Thienemann F, Dzudie A, Mocumbi AO, Blauwet L, Sani MU, Karaye

KM,

et al

. Rationale and design of the Pan-African Pulmonary hyper-

tension Cohort (PAPUCO) study: implementing a contemporary regis-

try on pulmonary hypertension in Africa.

Br Med J Open

2014;

4

(10):

e005950.

11. Thienemann F, Dzudie A, Mocumbi AO, Blauwet L, Sani MU, Karaye

KM,

et al

. The causes, treatment, and outcome of pulmonary hyperten-