Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  26 / 74 Next Page
Basic version Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 26 / 74 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 25, No 5, September/October 2014

220

AFRICA

NYHA class and presence of tricuspid and mitral regurgitation.

In a multiple regression analysis for predictors of mortality at

180 days, none of these variables reached statistical significance.

Discussion

This is the first detailed study of the clinical profile and short-

or medium-term outcome of AHF cases in southern Nigeria.

Similar to our earlier observation,

24

AHF in our community

predominantly affects younger and middle-aged individuals who

are in the prime of their lives. Hypertensive heart disease and

other non-ischaemic aetiology contribute to over 90% of the

cases.

The majority of our subjects presented with

de novo

acute

HF. Our findings with the use of some disease-modifying

agents such as angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors

or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), aldosterone

antagonists (except for beta-blockers and hydralazine–isosorbide

combination) are remarkably similar to findings in many other

parts of the world.

6,8

Mortality rates in the short and medium

term are relatively low, and higher in women than men.

Our findings of relatively young age at presentation for AHF

is similar to reports from many parts of Africa.

1,4,25

AHF patients

on the continent are about 20 years younger than similar patients

in high-income countries.

6-9

This implies that HF afflicts our

population in their productive years, with attendant economic

loss to the society and greater disability-adjusted life years.

The comparable or even lower short- or medium-term

mortality rate of HF in our cohort compared to findings in high-

income countries is an important observation from this study.

7,8

Mortality rates in our study were 4.2% (95% CI: 2.4–7.3%) and

7.3% (95% CI: 14.7–11.2%) at 30 days and 180 days, respectively.

Unlike findings in high-income countries,

26,27

we noted that

age was not associated with poorer outcome in our cohorts.

Our finding of a better prognosis in obese individuals is similar

to that of other researchers.

27,28

In the Framingham study, high

BMI was associated with a better prognosis (HR for mortality

per one SD: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.75–1.04 for men, and 0.86, 95%

CI: 0.72–1.03 for women). This may also be consistent with the

‘obesity paradox’ in HF.

29-31

Underweight in HF patients may be

indicative of cardiac cachexia, and progression of HF and poor

prognosis.

Lower blood pressure or pulse pressure was associated with

a poorer outcome. This may reflect advanced HF and decreased

stroke volume. This has been noted in previous studies.

26,32

It is now well known that impaired renal function is an

important predictor of all-cause mortality inHF.

33-35

This is similar

1.00

0.98

0.96

0.94

0.92

0.90

0

30 60 90 120 150 180

Duration (days)

Male

Female

Fig. 2.

Kaplan–Meier survival curve for males and females.

1.00

0.90

0.80

0.70

0.60

0

30 60 90 120 150 180

Time (days)

Cumulative survival

HHF

Pericardial dx

DCM

Others

Fig. 3.

Kaplan–Meier survival curve for the different aetiologi-

cal risk factors.

Table 3.Twelve-lead ECG and echocardiographic

profile according to gender.

Variable

All

(

n

=

285)

Men

(

n

=

150)

Women

(

n

=

135) p-value

Ventricular rate (bpm)

96.3

±

22.5 94.3

±

17.3 101.3

±

21.8 0.110

QRS duration (ms)

116.0

±

26.2 117.1

±

24.5 107.8

±

41.1 0.213

QT interval (ms)

350.7

±

30.6 374.3

±

35.0 348.8

±

45.5 0.006

Corrected QT (ms)

442.0

±

20.9 462.2

±

38.2 447.6

±

36.2 0.085

Atrial fibrillation (%)

13.3

16.7

9.6

0.337

Aortic root diameter (cm) 3.2

±

0.6 3.26

±

0.58 2.84

±

0.38

<

0.001

Left atrial diameter (cm)

5.9

±

0.8 4.75

±

0.89 4.50

±

0.85 0.176

Left atrial area (cm

2

)

30.15

±

9.91 28.8

±

9.0 24.7

±

6.3 0.010

IVSD (cm)

1.18

±

0.28 1.33

±

0.39 1.23

±

0.32 0.393

LVPWd (cm)

1.38

±

0.35 1.19

±

0.39 1.10

±

0.35 0.116

LVIDd (cm)

5.52

±

0.97 5.81

±

1.61 5.16

±

1.45 0.353

LVIDs (cm)

4.51

±

1.57 4.80

±

1.63 4.16

±

1.43 0.001

Fractional shortening (%) 14.5

±

2.97 17.77

±

13.10 19.80

±

12.21 0.060

Ejection fraction (%)

36.8

±

6.53 40.57

±

23.61 45.12

±

20.11 0.007

E/A ratio

2.11

±

1.55 2.14

±

1.47 1.90

±

1.25 0.199

DT (ms)

145.8

±

59.2 144.2

±

58.3 147.9

±

60.5 0.480

IVRT (ms)

111.0

±

34.3 114.9

±

35.8 106.1

±

32.1 0.127

LV mass (absolute)

449.0

±

217.5 561.7

±

106.6 233.0

±

54.24 0.026

LV mass (indexed)

274.1

±

117.5 336.4

±

46.6 160.9

±

16.1 0.016

Mitral regurgitation (%)

19.6

18.7

20.7

0.894

Tricuspid regurgitation (%)

15.1

12.7

17.8

0.459

IVSD

=

interventricular septal wall thickness in diastole, LVPWd

=

left

ventricular posterior wall thickness in diastole, LVIDd

=

left ventricular inter-

nal diameter in diastole, LVIDs

=

left ventricular internal diameter in systole,

DT

=

deceleration time, IVRT

=

isovolumic relaxation time.