CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 26, No 3, May/June 2015
112
AFRICA
Discussion
The results of this study indicate that the presence of NAFLD
was associated with impaired RV diastolic function (RVDF).
In addition, the evidence showed that the existence of NAFLD
was related to the extent of impairment in RVDF. NAFLD is
more common in patients with impaired RVDF, obesity, insulin
resistance, hypertension, hyperlipidaemia, coronary artery
disease, obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome, oxidative stress,
endothelial dysfunction and the metabolic syndrome.
In this study, although RVDF was impaired, systolic function
was preserved in NAFLD patients. Furthermore, HS grade was
positively correlated with RV MPI. Several studies reported only
diastolic left ventricular dysfunction, while others reported both
diastolic and systolic left ventricular functional impairment in
NAFLD patients with hypertension, insulin resistance, type 2
diabetes and/or the metabolic syndrome.
18-20
Evaluating the possible influence and correlation of metabolic,
cardiovascular and liver biopsy parameters on cardiac left
ventricular dysfunction, we found a positive correlation between
left ventricular parameters and severity of liver damage (NAS
score).
9
However, to the best of our knowledge, to date, no study
has explored the involvement of right ventricular systolic and
diastolic function and its relationship with HS grade in NAFLD
patients.
We speculated that the excessive lipid accumulation in
hepatocytes that is a characteristic of NAFLD can lead to
lipid deposition in cardiac myocytes, promoting RVDF. In
addition, our study showed that significantly impaired RVDF
was associated with HS grade in NAFLD according to TDI.
However, we could not detect any significant difference in
tricuspid lateral annulus systolic velocity between the NAFLD
patients and controls. Therefore, right ventricular systolic
function was not impaired in patients with NAFLD.
MPI is a DTI-derived quantitative parameter used frequently
in recent years to grade systolic and diastolic function. This
index was first described by Tei
et al
.
21
and is widely accepted
because it correlates with more invasive measurements, is easy
to reproduce and is easy to perform. In coronary artery disease,
a prolonged MPI is an important disease precursor observed
before the development of systolic dysfunction.
22
A markedly
prolonged MPI despite an unchanged tricuspid lateral annulus
systolic velocity in NAFLD patients compared with the control
group is compatible with the hypothesis that prolonged MPI
stems from RVDD. In fact, RVDF deteriorates in NAFLD, and
this deterioration is associated with grade of HS.
There were some limitations to our study. The first was the
small sample size. The second was that the diagnostic method
depended on USG, and the exclusion of other secondary
causes of chronic liver disease was not confirmed by liver
biopsy. Although liver biopsy is currently the gold standard
for distinguishing NAFLD forms, for assessing the severity of
damage and prognosis, NAFLD can be detected as a bright
liver on USG, which is possible to perform routinely. Moreover,
liver USG has proven to be a sensitive, accurate and convenient
diagnostic tool in detecting steatosis. Its sensitivity ranges from
60 to 94% and its specificity from 84 to 95%.
15,23
Conclusion
We found that there was significant impairment in diastolic
function in non-diabetic and normotensive NAFLD patients
compared to the controls. It should be kept in mind that diastolic
function may be impaired while systolic function is preserved in
NAFLD patients. We suggest that patients with NAFLD require
aggressive cardiac risk-factor modification and closer follow up
for the prevention of diastolic and systolic heart failure.
References
1.
Chitturi S, Farrell G, George J. Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in the
Asia-Pacific region: future shock.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol
2004;
19
:
368–374.
2.
Marchesini G, Bugianesi E, Forlani G,
et al
. Non-alcoholic fatty liver,
steatohepatitis and the metabolic syndrome.
Hepatology
2003;
37
:
917–923.
3.
Musso G, Gambino R, Bo S,
et al.
Should nonalcoholic fatty liver
disease be included in the definition of metabolic syndrome? A cross-
sectional comparison with ATP III criteria in non-obese non-diabetic
subjects.
Diabetes Care
2008;
31
: 562–568.
4.
Lizardi-Cervera J, Chavez-Tapia NC, Pérez-Bautista O,
et al
. Association
among C-reactive protein, fatty liver disease, and cardiovascular risk.
Dig Dis Sci
2007;
52
: 2375–2379.
5.
Wilfred de Alwis NM, Day CP. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: the
mist gradually clears.
J Hepatology
2008;
48
: 104–112.
6.
Targher G, Day CP, Bonora E. Risk of cardiovascular disease in
patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.
N Engl J Med
2010;
363
:
1341–1350.
7.
Stefan N, Kantartzis K, Machann J,
et al
. Identification and charac-
terization of metabolically benign obesity in humans.
Arch Intern Med
2008;
168
: 1609–1616.
8.
Peterson LR, Herrero P, Schechtman KB,
et al
. Effect of obesity and
insulin resistance on myocardial substrate metabolism and efficiency in
young women.
Circulation
2004;
109
: 2191–2196.
9.
Kleiner DE, Brunt EM, VanNattaM,
et al
. Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis
Clinical Research Network. Design and validation of a histological scor-
ing system for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.
Hepatology
2005;
41
:
1313–1321.
10. Futbolcu H, Yakar T, Duman D,
et al
. Impairment of the left ventricu-
lar systolic and diastolic function in patients with non-alcoholic fatty
liver disease.
Cardiol J
2010;
17
: 457–463.
11. Dell’Italia LJ. Reperfusion for right ventricular infarction.
N Engl J Med
1998;
338
: 978–980.
12. Ulusoy RE, Yokusoglu M, Baysan O,
et al
. Ventricular functions, aortic
elastic properties, and endothelial functions in patients with hypertensive
response to treadmill exercise testing.
Turk J Med Sci
2011;
41
: 781–787.
13. Çiçekçio
ğ
lu H, Ergün
İ
, Uçar Ö,
et al
. Cardiac complications of second-
ary hyperparathyroidism in chronic hemodialysis patients.
Turk J Med
Sci
2011;
41
: 789–794.
14. Gibson CM, Cannon CP, Daley WL,
et al
. TIMI frame count: a quan-
titative method of assessing coronary artery flow.
Circulation
1996;
93
:
Table 5. Correlations between grade of hepatosteatosis
and echocardiographic parameters
Parameters
r
p
-value
Ea
0.020
0.886
Ea/Aa
–0.156
0.260
IVRT*
0.295
0.03
MPI*
0.641
<
0.001
*By hepatosteatosis, IVRT: isovolumetric relaxation time, MPI: right
ventricular myocardial performance index, HS: hepatosteatosis.