Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  23 / 74 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 23 / 74 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 29, No 5, September/October 2018

AFRICA

285

normoalbuminuric diabetics (

p

=

0.02). WC, SBP and PR showed

a significant stepwise increase from control to microalbuminuric

group (

p

<

0.001,

p

=

0.03,

p

=

0.03, respectively). Weight, BMI,

WHR, DBP and PP were comparable among the three groups.

Renal function, as assessed by estimated glomerular filtration

rate (eGFR) using the Cockcroft Gault formula, was reasonably

preserved among the three groups. It was highest in the control

group but not statistically significantly different.

The mean values of all lipid components were normal

and comparable, except for the low-density lipoprotein (LDL)

cholesterol level and atherogenic ratio, which showed a significant

stepwise increase from control to microalbuminric group (

p

=

0.0008 and

p

=

0.01, respectively). FBS was also significantly

higher in the diabetic groups compared to the controls (

p

=

0.001).

Table 2 shows the echocardiographic parameters of LV function

among the three groups. Mean values of EF and FS were normal

in the three groups, but FS showed a significant stepwise decrease

from control to microalbuminuric group (

p

=

0.0002).

Doppler echocardiographic parameters showed some degree

of LV diastolic dysfunction, which was more pronounced in the

diabetic groups. A velocity (

p

=

0.0034), IVRT (

p

=

0.0001) and

PASP (

p

=

0.02) showed a significant stepwise increase from

control to microalbuminuric group, with a reverse trend for E

velocity (

p

<

0.001) and E/A ratio (

p

<

0.001).

Fig. 1 shows the prevalence and pattern of LVDD

among the three groups. The prevalence of LVDD showed a

stepwise increase from 16.9% in the control to 78.9% in the

microalbuminuric group. The most common grade of DD was

grade 1, which occurred in 70.4 and 55.5% of microalbuminuric

and normoalbuminuric groups, respectively, compared to 16.9%

in the controls. Grade 1 was the only type of DD found in the

control group; 3.2% of the normoalbuminuric group and 8.5%

of the microalbuminuric group had grade 2 pattern of DD. None

of the microalbuminuric group had grade 3 but 3.2% of the

normoalbuminuric group did. These observed differences were

statistically significantly different (

χ

2

=

50.05,

p

<

0.01).

Table 3 shows clinical and biochemical parameters that

correlated significantly with indices of LV diastolic function

(E/A ratio and IVRT) among the normotensive diabetics. The

strongest correlate of E/A ratio in the model was age (

p

<

0.001).

Serum creatinine level (

p

=

0.009) and eGFR (

p

=

0.009) also

correlated significantly with E/A, but the other parameters did

not.

Table 4 shows univariate and multivariate regression models

used to determine predictors of LVDD in the normotensive

diabetics. At the univariate level, age and MCA status were

significantly associated with the occurrence of LVDD. Those

with microalbuminuria had about a four-fold increased risk of

developing LVDD compared to those with normoalbuminuria

(95% CI: 1.99–6.82,

p

<

0.001). Also, for every one year increase

in age, the risk of developing DD increased by 11% (95% CI:

4–17%,

p

0.001).

After adjusting for all the other factors in the multivariate

model, only age remained an independent predictor of DD. The

model shows that for every one year increase in age, there was

Table 1. Sociodemographic, anthropometric and laboratory data

(mean

±

SD) variations among healthy controls, and normotensive

diabetics with normoalbuminuria or microalbuminuria

Characteristics

Controls

(

n

=

59)

Normo-

albuminuric

No

=

63

Micro-

albuminuric

(

n

=

71) F-test

p-

value

Age (years)

47

±

10.0 50

±

7.5

51

±

7.0 0.87 0.43

Gender (% male)

49

51

45

2.05 0.36

DMdur (years)

0

4.7

±

2.8

6.1

±

4.1 2.38 0.02

Weight (kg)

66

±

11

68

±

13

69

±

12

1.00 0.37

Height (cm)

162

±

8

162

±

8

161

±

9

0.62 0.54

BMI (kg/m

2

)

24.93

±

4.4 26.4

±

5.2 26.5

±

3.8 2.14 0.12

BSA (m

2

)

1.71

±

0.17 1.74

±

0.18 1.75

±

0.18 0.64 0.53

Waist (cm)

83

±

10*

89

±

10

91

±

10 11.19

<

0.001

WHR

0.89

± 0

.08 0.93

±

0.07 0.93

±

0.13 2.96 0.05

SBP (mmHg)

116

±

11

118

±

9

120

±

8

3.51 0.03

DBP (mmHg)

74

±

8

74

±

6

76

±

6

2.62 0.08

PP (mmHg)

42

±

9

42

±

6

43

±

7

1.42 0.25

PR (beats/min)

79

±

12*

83

±

10

83

±

8

3.55 0.03

Creatinine (mg/dl) 0.9

±

0.19 1.0

±

0.31 1.01

±

0.24 2.64 0.08

Urea (mmol/l)

2.6

±

0.8*

4.2

±

1.7

4.0

±

1.7 4.3

0.02

eGFR (ml/min)

102

±

20

79

±

31

86

±

30

2.38 0.10

TC (mmol/l)

4.0

±

0.6

4.6

±

1.1

4.5

±

1.2 1.17 0.32

TG (mmol/l)

0.9

±

0.4

1.3

±

0.8

1.1

±

0.5 2.33 0.10

HDL-C (mmol/l) 1.73

±

0.3 1.45

±

0.5 1.37

±

0.5 2.81 0.07

LDL-C (mmol/l) 1.74

±

0.6

2.38

±

1

2.64

±

0.8 5.14 0.008

AR

2.3

±

0.4*

3.5

±

1.6

3.6

±

1.0 4.67 0.01

FBS (mmol/l)

5.0

±

0.5*

8.1

±

4

9.3

±

4

3.72 0.001

F-test for ANOVA or student’s

t

-test.

*

p

<

0.05 compared to normoalbuminuria by ANOVA.

p

<

0.05 compared to microalbuminuria by ANOVA.

BMI: body mass index, BSA: body surface area, DMdur: duration of diabetes

mellitus, WHR: waist:hip ratio, SBP: systolic blood pressure, DBP: diastolic

blood pressure, PR: pulse rate, PP: pulse pressure, AR: atherogenic ratio, eGFR:

estimated glomerular filtration rate, TC: total cholesterol, TG: triglycerides,

HDL-C: high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, LDL-C: low-density lipoprotein

cholesterol, FBS: fasting blood sugar level.

Table 2. Comparison of echocardiographic parameters (mean

±

SD) of

left ventricular systolic and diastolic function among healthy controls,

and normotensive diabetics with normoalbuminuria or microalbuminuria

Echo parameters

Control

(

n

=

59)

Normo-

albuminuric

(

n

=

63)

Micro-

albuminuric

(

n

=

71) F-test

p

-value

LVIDd (mm)

42

±

4.4

40

±

4.9

38

±

4.3 7.84 0.0006

LVIDs (mm)

27

±

3.2

26

±

2.8

26

±

3.2 0.81 0.45

EDV (ml)

82

±

19

76

±

20

68

±

16 8.13 0.0004

ESV (ml)

27

±

8

26

±

8

25

±

7

0.82 0.44

Stroke volume (ml)

54

±

20

51

±

19

45

±

17 9.28 0.0002

Cardiac output (l)

4.3

±

0.9

4.2

±

1.1

3.6

±

1.0 10.05 0.0002

Ejection fraction (%)

62

±

7.3

63

±

8

60

±

6.2 1.99 0.14

FS (%)

36

±

5.5

34

±

6.1

31

±

4.1 11.39

<

0.001

Mitral E velocity (m/s) 77

±

21*

65

±

18

61

±

12 20.65

<

0.001

Mitral A velocity (m/s) 67

±

17

69

±

13

74

±

13 5.9 0.0034

E/A ratio

1.2

±

0.3

1.0

±

0.3

0.8

±

0.2 31.51

<

0.001

IVRT (s)

79

±

13

84

±

16

90

±

18 9.65 0.0001

Deceleration time (s)

199

±

29 192

±

42

192

±

33 0.03 0.9658

PVF S velocity (m/s)

56

±

11

47

±

14

52

±

11 4.57 0.0123

PVF D velocity (m/s)

49

±

8*

42

±

7

47

±

11 5.11 0.0074

S/D ratio

1.2

±

0.2 1.1

±

0.2

1.1

±

0.3 0.38 0.685

PVF Ar velocity (m/s) 31

±

4.4

33

±

4.0

34

±

3.0 2.72 0.069

PASP (mmHg)

30

±

8

30

±

7

33

±

9

4.22 0.0165

LADs (mm)

35

±

3.3

34

±

3.5

36

±

3.6 4.5 0.0125

*

p

<

0.05 compared to normoalbuminuria by ANOVA followed by Bonferroni

post hoc

test.

p

<

0.05 compared to microalbuminuria by ANOVA followed by Bonferroni

post

hoc

test.

F-test for ANOVA.

PVF: pulmonary venous flow, LADs: left atrial end-systolic dimension, IVRT:

isovolumic relaxation time, E: transmitral early-to-late inflow velocity ratio, A:

transmitral late atrial velocity, PASP: pulmonary artery systolic pressure.