Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  7 / 66 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 7 / 66 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 30, No 6, November/December 2019

AFRICA

315

What is in a number: the impact factor, citation analysis

and 30 years of publishing the

Cardiovascular Journal of

Africa

The

Cardiovascular Journal of Africa

(CVJA) has been publishing

for 30 years. Improving visibility and accessing milestones along

the way have been discussed previously, including citation

analysis of the journal.

1-4

In medicine and in science bibliometrics, citation analysis of

journals, specifically, plays a huge role in where researchers aim

to publish. The field has been well summarised in a recent article

by Roldan-Valadez

et al

.

5

Briefly, it is believed that the status of

journals wherein scholars publish, among others, helps to define

professional status, is seen as a measure of performance, defines

scientific merit, and is used by funders to make decisions.

Citation analyses defining impact range from the granddaddy

of all, the original journal impact factor (JIF) from the World

of Science (WOS) Journal Citation Reports (JCR), to the

Eigenfactor score, CiteScore, SCImago Journal Rank, Source-

Normalised Impact per Paper, and others. Furthermore, there

is also the H-index, which is used to evaluate the ‘impact’ of an

individual, but it can also be applied to groups such as research

groups, departments and faculties. More recently, alternative

metrics (altmetrics) has also come to the fore. This involves the

use of social media. For example, even tweets or Facebook likes

that an article receives are recorded.

As indicated above, there are many approaches to defining a

journal’s impact. However, put the name of a medical journal

in a Google search line and, invariably, besides a clickable list

containing the likely journal and some other possibilities, a

frame appears on the right side of the screen with three pieces of

information, the name of the journal, the JIF and the name of

the editor. It may or may not contain other details. So, although

this number is not the alpha and omega,

1

it does carry a lot of

weight.

I remember distinctly how the editor of the

European Heart

Journal

(EHJ), William Wijns, proudly mentioned at the South

African Heart Congress in 2017 that the EHJ now had a JIF

higher than that of

Circulation

. At the same congress, the editor

of the

Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation

(JHLT) argued

that the JIF of JHLT, of around seven at that time, was good,

given the highly specialised group it is aimed at, implying that

general popularity plays an important role.

In 2013 the CVJA drew attention to the curious case of a

lesser-known journal, the

CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians

(CA-AC) that had the highest JIF (2018: 223.679) with a massive

margin above the world’s most well-known general medical

journal, the

New England Journal of Medicine

(NJEM) (2018:

70.670).

3,6

To give some perspective, in 2017, CA-AC published

27 articles and the NEJM 327. The CA-AC had 4 089 citations.

However a single article, Cancer statistics 2017, is published

annually and is responsible for more than 60% of all citations.

NEJM had many more citations, namely 22 189 and 327 articles,

but the ratio of citations to articles was less. It is an issue of

ratios, not popularity.

While listening to the editors at the 2018 Heart Congress, I

thought about how in Africa, we compete in a small fishbowl,

but there is an ocean out there. With a JIF just above one, rank-

wise the CVJA lay third among the 14 medical journals from

Africa that are listed on JCR.

7

However, in the cardiovascular

field, the CVJA is alone. When a year later a JIF of 1.41 placed

the CVJA first among the African medical journals,

6

I felt proud

but at the same time, sad.

From Africa, only 68 journals (social sciences included) are

listed with the WOS, appear in the JCR and therefore have a JIF.

With more than 12 500 journals listed in this index, that is 0.54%

of the indexed journals.

6

By contrast, Africa has more than 1.3

billion people, equal to 16.72% of the world’s population.

8

Of

the 68 journals, CVJA ranks ninth but is top of the 14 medical

journals and, furthermore, is the only listed cardiovascular

journal. First among the 68 African journals is the

Journal of

Advanced Research

, an Egyptian journal, with a JIF of 5.045.

Within South Africa, and more specifically the Western Cape,

where the office of the CVJA is, the higher ranking accorded the

South African Journal of Enology and Viticulture

(JIF 1.692)

6

may

be appropriate. After all the Western Cape is world renowned for

its vineyards and wine. However, sitting on a university library

committee, I learnt that in certain areas, law for instance, citation

analysis is of peripheral interest.

So although CVJA was the number one medical journal in

Africa for 2018, with a JIF of 1.410, we must remember that

globally, Africa, although very populous, is a small player.

Citations to CVJA articles have increased from 370 in 2014 to

899 in 2018, with quite a dramatic increase since 2017. Credit

goes to Professor Patrick Commerford, editor of the CVJA.

We also thank the authors who publish articles in the CVJA,

articles that attract an increasing number of citations. We need

to develop globally recognised institutions in Africa.

Paul A Brink

Emeritus Professor of Medicine, University of Stellenbosch

continued on page 320…

2000

1500

1000

500

0

100

75

50

25

0

2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Journal impact factor

Percentile rank in category (%)

Journal impact factor

Cardiac & cardiovascular systems

Fig. 1.

Five-year trend of the journal impact factor for the

Cardiovascular Journal of Africa

.

6