Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  38 / 78 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 38 / 78 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 26, No 4, July/August 2015

184

AFRICA

(41.2%) for one to five years, and seven (13.7%) for less than a

year.

In the ICD group, there was one device in the re-used device

group that delivered inappropriate shocks (inappropriate delivery

of shocks for supraventricular tachycardia), during the early

stages of implantation but this resolved without any intervention.

This device subsequently needed generator replacement after

14 months from implantation. There were no device infections

identified after a median follow up of 35.9 months (IQR,

17.0–70.9 months) for the cases and 45.7 months (IQR, 37.6–53.7

months) for the controls. There were no procedure-non-related

infections documented for the follow-up period.

For the ICD cases, five (41.7%) patients were followed up

for five years or more, and seven (58.3%) for one to five years.

For the ICD controls, seven (58.3%) were followed up for five

years or more, and five (41.7%) for one to five years. In both

groups (pacemaker and ICD) there were no devices explanted for

infection or malfunctioning during the follow-up period.

In the re-used pacemaker group, 26 (51%) patients attended

follow up at three months, whereas 25 (49%) did not attend. Of

those who did not attend, 11 (44%) had died, nine (36%) were

alive, and five (20%) were lost to follow up (Fig. 2). Of those

who died, eight (72.7%) were documented to have died from

natural causes, one (9.1%) from cancer and two (18.2%) from

non-pacemaker-related sepsis, of whom one died within 24 hours

of implantation and the other after two months of implantation.

The patient who died within 24 hours of device implantation

was admitted with a methicillin-resistant

Staphylococcus aureus

(MRSA) endocarditis prior to pacemaker implantation.

In the new pacemaker group, 43 (84.3%) patients attended

follow up at three months, whereas eight (15.7%) did not attend

follow up. Of those who did not attend, one (12.5%) had died

and seven (87.5) were alive (Fig. 2). The patient who died was

an 87-year-old man who passed away at home two days after

pacemaker implantation from natural causes.

In the re-used pacemaker group, at one-year follow up, 19

(37.3%) patients attended follow up, whereas 32 (62.7%) did

not attend follow up. Of those who did not attend follow up, 15

(46.9%) had died, nine (28.1%) were alive, and eight (25%) were

lost to follow up (Fig. 2). All deaths were due to natural causes

except the two who were septic, mentioned above.

For the new pacemaker group, 38 (74.5%) patients attended

follow up while 13 (25.5%) patients did not attend follow up at

one year. Of those who did not attend follow up, three (23.1%)

had died, seven (53.8%) were alive and three (23.1%) were lost to

follow up (Fig. 2). All deaths were due to natural causes.

Table 2. Pacemaker parameters

Parameters

Patients with

re-used pace-

makers (cases)

Patients with

new pacemak-

ers (controls)

p

-value

DDD,

n

(%)

11 (21.6)

7 (13.7)

0.30

VVI,

n

(%)

39 (76.5)

42 (82.4)

0.463

Other,

n

(%)

1 (2)

2(3.95)

Minimum pacing rate, bpm 63.4

±

6.0

61.6

±

5.1 0.09

Ventricular pacing,

n

(%)

50 (98)

49 (96.1)

0.558

Battery voltage, V

2.78 (2.77–2.79)

Battery current, A

13.86

±

4.9

Battery impedance, K

Ω

0.482

±

0.3

Estimated battery life (years) 6.085

±

1.7

Capture

Amplitude, V

Atrial

0.48

±

0.15 0.57

±

0.23 0.323

Ventricular

0.49

±

0.34 0.48

±

0.18 0.747

Pulse width, ms

Atrial

0.5 (0.5–0.5) 0.5 (0.475–0.5) 0.485

Ventricular

0.5 (0.5–0.5)

0.5 (0.5–0.5) 0.355

Sensitivity, mV

Atrial

4.3 (3.750–5.5) 3.8 (2.875–6.2) 0.255

Ventricular

14.09

±

6.50 15.27

±

7.14 0.406

Electrode impedance,

Ω

Atrial

692

±

178

804

±

275 0.289

Ventricular

748

±

267

808

±

285 0.289

Other = AAI, V = volts; mV = millivolts; ms = millisecond;

Ω

= ohms;

K

Ω

= kilo-ohms; A = amperes; bpm = beats per minute; DDD = dual-

chamber pacemaker; VVI = single-chamber pacemaker.

Table 3. Characteristics of patients who received implantable

cardioverter defibrillators

Characteristics

Patients with

re-used ICDs

(cases)

Patients with

new ICDs

(controls)

n

-value

Sample size,

n

12

12

Age

49.83

±

17.34 50.58

±

17.27 0.916

Gender,

n

(%)

Male

10 (83.3)

10 (83.3)

Female

2 (16.7)

2 (16.7)

Co-morbidities,

n

(%)

Hypertension

4 (33.3)

4 (33)

1.00

Diabetes mellitus

1 (8.3)

2 (16.7)

0.537

Renal impairment

8 (66.7)

6 (50)

0.408

Cancer

0 (0)

0 (0)

Myocardial infarction

7 (58.3)

4 (33.3)

0.49

Cardiomyopathy

3 (25)

2 (1.7)

1.00

CVA

1 (8.3)

1 (8.3)

1.00

COPD

2 (1.7)

0 (0)

0.48

Dementia

0 (0)

0 (0)

Baseline function,

n

(%)

NYHA functional class 1

1 (8.3)

5 (41.7)

0.20

NYHA functional class 2

7 (58.3)

7 (58.3)

1.00

NYHA functional class 3

4 (33.3)

0 (0)

0.11

Wheelchair bound

0 (0)

0 (0)

Bed bound

0 (0)

0 (0)

Ventricular tachycardia,

n

(%)

9 (75)

10 (83.3)

0.615

Other,

n

(%)

3 (25)

2 (16.7)

0.615

First implantation,

n

(%)

12(100)

11(91.7)

0.307

Battery change,

n

(%)

0(0)

1 (8.3)

0.307

Primary implanter,

n

(%)

Cardiologist

11 (91.7)

12 (100)

1.00

Cardiology registrar

1 (8.3)

0 (0)

Follow up at 3 months,

n

(%)

Yes

12 (100)

12 (100)

1.00

No

0 (0)

0 (0)

Follow up at 1 year,

n

(%)

Yes

12 (100)

11 (91.7)

0.307

No

0 (0)

1 (8.3)

CVA = cerebrovascular accident; COPD = chronic obstructive

pulmonary disease; NYHA = New York Heart Association; AV block

= atrioventricular block;

n

= number; (%) = percentage; Other =

ventricular fibrillation and arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardio-

myopathy.