Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  48 / 88 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 48 / 88 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 28, No 4, July/August 2017

250

AFRICA

median age was four years (range 1.9–4.9 years). This emphasises

that even though ARF/RHD commonly presents at between five

and 15 years of age, there are cases that present early (under five

years) who meet the criteria for the diagnosis of ARF.

Regarding clinical presentation, the majority (

n

=

52; 93%)

of our patients presented for the first time with RHD. Only four

patients presented with ARF as their first presentation. This

may have be due to cases of ARF being missed at the primary

healthcare level or patients not presenting early at the clinic with

a sore throat.

In the Soweto study, Sliwa

et al

.

15

reported on adult cases who

presented for the first time with RHD. No patients presented

with ARF. This suggests that patients who are not diagnosed

early with ARF may present later with established RHD. As a

result, they made the suggestion that new cases of RHD should

be notified in order to ensure registration and follow up of these

patients. Lack of notification of ARF/RHD may result in under-

reporting. Nkgudi

et al

. mentioned under-reporting of ARF in

their study

16

and concluded it was due to poor administration of

the ARF notification system.

The majority of patients who underwent valvular surgery in

our study had mitral and aortic valve surgery. Cilliers reported

this as the commonest surgery for RHD.

2

Timeous surgery for

RHD has very good outcomes.

17

A limitation of this study is that it was a retrospective chart

audit of patients seen and admitted to one hospital. The fact that

these patients were mostly referred from other hospitals made

it very challenging to estimate the incidence of ARF/RHD, as

there was no primary screening of subjects suspected to have

ARF/RHD.

Despite the limitations, the findings have important

implications. RHD should be notifiable, as the majority of our

patients presented with RHD. Prospective studies are required in

the Eastern Cape to determine the true prevalence of ARF/RHD.

Conclusion

The true burden of ARF/RHD in the Eastern Cape Province

is unknown and therefore prospective studies are needed to

determine the prevalence or incidence of ARF and RHD in this

province.

References

1.

Carapetis JR, Sreer AC, Mulholland EK,

et al

. The global burden of

group A streptococcal diseases.

Lancet Infect Dis

2005;

5

(11): 685–694.

2.

Marijon E, Mirabel M, Celermajer DS,

et al

. Rheumatic heart disease

.

Lancet

2012;

379

: 953–964.

3.

Cilliers AM. Rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease in Gauteng

on the decline: Experience at Chris Hani Baragwanath Hospital,

Johannesburg, South Africa.

S Afr Med J

22014;

104

(9): 632–634.

4.

Gordis L. The virtual disappearance of rheumatic fever in the United

States: Lessons in the rise and fall of disease. T Duckett Jones memorial

lecture.

Circulation

1985;

72

: 1155–1162.

5.

Essop MR, Nkomo VT. Rheumatic and non-rheumatic valvular

heart disease: Epidemiology, management, and prevention in Africa.

Circulation

2005;

112

: 3584–3591.

6.

Zuhlke LJ, Steer AC. Estimates of the Global Burden of Rheumatic

Heart Disease.

Global Heart

2013;

8

: 189–195.

7.

Zuhlke LJ, Mirabel M, Marijon E. Congenital heart disease and rheu-

matic heart disease in Africa: Recent advances and current priorities.

Heart

2013;

99

: 1554–1561.

8.

Seckeler MD, Hoke TR. The worldwide epidemiology of rheumatic

fever and rheumatic heart disease.

Clin Epidemiol

2011;

3

: 67–84.

9.

Smit FE, Botes L, Rossouw S,

et al

. The prevalence of rheumatic

heart disease among Grade 10–12 learners in the Free State and

Northern Cape – Preliminary results of the Wheels-of-Hope Outreach

Programme

. SA Heart J

2015;

12

(3): 146–151.

10. McClarenMJ, Hawkins DM, Koornhof HJ,

et al

. Epidemiology of rheu-

matic heart disease in black school children of Soweto, Johannesburg.

Br Med J

1975;

3

(5981): 474–478.

11. Gewitz MH, Baltimore RS, Tani LY,

et al

. Revision of the Jones criteria

for the diagnosis of acute rheumatic fever in the era of doppler echocar-

diography. A scientific statement from the American Heart Association.

Circulation

2015;

131

(20): 1806–1818.

12. Jones, TD. Diagnosis of rheumatic fever.

J Am Med Assoc

1944;

126

:

481–486.

13. Vahanian A, Baumgartner H, Bax J,

et al

. Task force on the manage-

ment of valvular heart disease of the European Society of Cardiology,

and ESC committee for practice guidelines. Guidelines on the manage-

ment of valvular heart disease.

Eur Heart J

2007;

28

(2): 230–268.

14. Tani LY, Veasy LG, Minich LL,

et al.

Rheumatic fever in children

younger than 5 years: is the presentation Different?

Pediatrics

2003;

11

2(5): 1065–1068.

15. Sliwa K, Carrington M, Mayosi BM,

et al

. Incidence and characteristics

of newly diagnosed rheumatic heart disease in urban African adults:

insights from the heart of Soweto study.

Eur Heart J

2010;

31

: 719–727.

16. Nkgudi B, Mayosi BM, Robertson KA,

et al

. Notification of rheu-

matic fever in South Africa- Evidence for underreporting by health care

professionals and administrators.

S Afr Med J

2006;

96

: 206–208.

17. Finucane K, Wilson, N. Priorities in cardiac surgery for rheumatic heart

disease.

Glob Heart

2013:

8

: 213–220.