Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  36 / 74 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 36 / 74 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 29, No 6, November/December 2018

368

AFRICA

of Kinanthropometry) level II accredited anthropometrists using

calibrated instruments and standardised methodology to obtain

waist circumference, with inter- and intra-observer variability

less than 10%.

Each participant’s individual coping style (Fig. 2) was

identified with the coping strategy indicator (CSI).

22

The CSI

is a self-report measure consisting of 33 items that determine

whether a person utilises the problem-solving, avoidance, or

seeking-social-support coping style in difficult times. The CSI

demonstrated Cronbach’s alpha (

α

) reliability coefficients of

0.76 to 0.83.

The 33 items in the CSI questionnaire are divided into three

subsets, namely defensive coping (DefS), avoidance/loss of

control, and seeking social support, with 11 items each. A DefS

strategy implies actively solving problems as a defence response,

being in control, and accepting the stressor as reality; seeking

social support implies an active process focused on acquiring

comfort and advice in stressful times; and emotional avoidance

or loss of control implies defeat, with physical and psychological

withdrawal. With a recent stressful event in mind, responders

answered each item using a three-point Likert scale: 3

=

a lot, 2

=

a little; and 1

=

not at all.

The accumulated answers indicate the use of a certain coping

style. A total score of

26 indicated above mean usage of the

problem-solving or active defensive coping style,

23 showed

above-mean use of the social support style, and

19 showed

above-mean use of the avoidance style.

22

For this study, the

following Cronbach’s alphas were calculated: CSI DefS (0.83),

social support (0.88) and avoidance (0.76).

The Africultural coping systems inventory (ACSI) is a 30-item

instrument that tested each participant’s culture-specific coping

behaviours during stressful experiences (Fig. 2). The ACSI was

developed using an African-centred theoretical framework to

analyse coping behaviours of Africans.

14

The ACSI four-factor

orthogonal self-report measure consists of an extensive list of

unique coping behaviours commonly observed among Africans.

Responders answered each item using the following four-point

Likert scale: 0

=

does not apply or did not use; 1

=

used a little, 2

=

used a lot; 3

=

used a great deal.

Participants were asked to think of a stressful situation they

had recently experienced and to respond to the instrument’s items

using the four-point scale. Coping subscales include cognitive/

emotional debriefing (11 items), spiritual-centred coping (eight

items), collectivistic-centred coping (eight items), and ritual-

centred coping (three items). Factor 1, cognitive/emotional

debriefing, represents adaptive and survival-like reactions to

manage perceived environmental stress. Factor 2, spiritual-

centred coping, tests an awareness of spiritual elements in the

cosmos and a sense of connection with the divine. Factor 3,

collectivistic-centred coping, tests respondents’ reliance on group-

centred activities to cope with stressful situations and is grounded

in a culture that values community above the individual. Factor

4, ritual-centred coping, assesses the extent to which participants

use cultural practices such as the performance of rituals, ancestral

worship and acknowledgement of various religious deities.

The ACSI demonstrated adequate internal consistency

reliability for the four subscales, with Cronbach’s alphas ranging

from 0.71 to 0.80.

14

The following Cronbach’s alphas were

calculated: cognitive/emotional debriefing (0.85), spiritual-

centred coping (0.82), collectivistic-centred coping (0.83) and

ritual-centred coping (0.73)

Scores for symptoms of depression were obtained via the

patient health questionnaire depression scale (PHQ-9), which

has been validated in various ethnic groups for use in primary

healthcare settings.

23

Each item evaluated the presence of one of

the nine criteria for major depression from the

Diagnostic and

Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

, 4th edn (DSM-IV-R).

The Cronbach’s alpha reliability index for the total three-year

PHQ-9 score in the current sub-study was 0.80, indicating good

reliability. The recommended and established PHQ-9 cut-off

point of

10 indicates the presence of depression.

A registered nurse collected fasting serum and plasma samples

using a sterile winged infusion set, after which these samples

were handled according to standardised procedures and frozen

at –80°C until analysis. The

γ

-GT levels were analysed with

the enzyme rate method (KonelabTM 20i, Thermo Scientific,

Vantaa, Finland). Serum cotinine levels were measured using the

homogeneous immunoassay on the Modular Roche automised

analyser (KonelabTM 20i; Thermo Scientific, Vantaa, Finland).

Glycated haemoglobin was measured with the Cobas

®

Integra

400 (Roche, Switzerland), using the turbidimetric inhibition

immunoassay method.

Statistical analysis

Data analyses were completed using the computer software

package Statistica

®

version 13.1 (Dell, TX, USA, 2017). Skewness

of data was tested, and

a priori

covariates were log-normalised if

skewed (age, waist circumference, log physical activity, log

γ

-GT,

Perceived stressor

Primary appraisal

Challenge/threat?

Coping strategy indicator (CSI)

Defensive coping (DefS)

Avoidance/loss of control

Seeking social support

Culture-specific coping strategies (ACSI)

Cognitive/emotional debriefing

Spiritual-centred coping

Collectivistic-centred coping

Ritual-centred coping

Emotional avoidance

(passive coping)

Coping through avoidance,

resulting in withdrawal or

loss of control of a stressor

DefS (active coping)

Coping methods that focus

on control of a perceived

stressor or continuing to

function despite the stressor

Effective

coping

Ineffective

coping

Reappraisal

Fig. 2.

Flow diagram of coping strategies, namely the coping

strategy indicator (CSI),

22

and the Africultural coping

systems inventory (ACSI).

14