Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  37 / 74 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 37 / 74 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 29, No 6, November/December 2018

AFRICA

369

and log cotinine). Changes (

Δ

) were calculated using the formula:

Δ =

follow up – baseline. Coping measures included DefS, social

support, avoidance, cognitive/emotion, spiritual-, collectivistic-

and ritual-centred scores.

Independent

t

-tests and chi-squared (

χ

²) tests compared coping

and BP differences in means and proportions between black

and white respondents at baseline, respectively. The

t-

test for

dependent sampling compared ethnic differences over time.

McNemar’s case–control tests were used to demonstrate changes

in depression, hypertension, and usage of anti-hypertensive

medication over three years, and odds ratios (OR) and 95%

confidence intervals (CI) were determined. Logistic regression

analyses were computed to determine (1) changes in coping

scores over three years predicting chronic depression (PHQ-9

10); and (2) changes in depressive symptoms predicting 24-hour

hypertension, independent of

a priori

covariates. A sensitivity

analysis was done by repeating logistic regression analyses to

adjust for HIV-positive status and use of hypertension medication.

The statistical significance level was set at

p

0.05 (two-tailed).

Effect sizes when comparing means or proportions are reported

as

d

-values with 0.2

=

small effect, 0.5

=

medium effect and 0.8

=

large effect. When reporting OR as an effect size, the following

guideline values can be used: 1.5

=

small effect, 2.5

=

medium

effect and 4.25

=

large effect.

24

Results

Interaction terms showed ethnic differences for

Δ

24-hour DBP

[

F

(1.355)

=

5.04;

p

=

0.025] and

Δ

social support [

F

(1.353)

=

38.6;

p

0.001]. These findings were used to stratify participants

into ethnic groups.

Cross-sectional investigation

Table 1 compares baseline characteristics of the two ethnic

groups. Cardiovascular risk was higher in blacks compared

to whites (

p

0.001), with mean values exceeding known

cut-off points with medium to large effects (

d

-values

>

0.5; BP:

24-hour SBP

130 mmHg and/or 24-hour DBP

80 mmHg).

Blacks similarly showed statistically significantly higher risk for

psychosocial stress, i.e. longer exposure to an urban-dwelling

lifestyle, more alcohol consumption (

γ

-GT), and less physical

activity compared to whites (

p

0.001), with a medium to

large effect. Blacks had increased 24-hour heart rate, 24-hour

hypertension, and used more anti-hypertensive medication than

whites (

p

0.001; medium effect). Coping scores indicated that

whites used more avoidance coping coupled with less social-

support-seeking coping strategies (

p

0.001; medium and

large effects). Blacks also reported the use of more cognitive/

emotional, spiritual-centred, collectivistic- and ritual-centred

coping than whites (

p

0.001; medium to large effects).

Table 1. Clinical characteristics of a bi-ethnic

South African teacher’s cohort at baseline

Characteristics

Blacks

(

n

=

173)

Whites

(

n

=

186)

p

-values

d

-values

Age, years

44.5 ± 7.8

46.6 ± 9.9

0.03 –0.21

Women,

n

(%)

84 (48.6)

95 (51.1)

0.63 –0.07

Urban living, years

32.0 ± 16.0

20.7 ± 12.4

<

0.001 0.71

Cotinine, ng/ml

26.8 ± 59.5

24.1 ± 81.0

0.72 0.03

Gamma-glutamyl

transferase, U/l

68.0 ± 83.8

28.0 ±35.3

<

0.001 0.48

Physical activity, kcal/24 h 2689.8 ± 812.7 3048.4 ± 826.7

<

0.001 –0.43

Waist circumference, cm 93.7 ± 14.9

93.6 ± 16.2

0.98 0.01

Depressive symptoms

9.4 ± 5.4

5.6 ± 4.6

<

0.001 0.70

Coping scores (CSI)

Defensive

28.2 ± 4.2

29.0 ± 3.8

0.052 –0.19

Social support

25.6 ± 7.8

18.7 ± 4.9

<

0.001 0.88

Avoidance

21.1 ± 3.8

23.8 ± 5.2

<

0.001 –0.52

Culture–specific coping scores (ACSI)

Cognitive emotion

15.9 ± 6.7

10.0 ± 5.8

<

0.001 0.88

Collectivistic-centred

12.6 ± 5.4

8.6 ± 4.2

<

0.001 0.74

Ritual-centred

2.4 ± 2.4

0.4 ± 0.9

<

0.001 0.83

Spiritual-centred

13.4 ± 6.1

11.3 ± 5.3

<

0.001 0.34

Cardiovascular risk

HbA

1c

, %

6.1 ± 1.3

5.5 ± 0.4

<

0.001 0.46

24-h SBP, mmHg

133 ± 16

125 ± 12

<

0.001 0.50

24-h DBP, mmHg

84 ± 11

77 ± 8

<

0.001 0.64

24-h PP, mmHg

49 ± 9

47 ± 7

0.03 0.22

24-h heart rate, bpm

80 ± 10

74 ± 10

<

0.001 0.60

HIV,

n

(%)

15 (8.7)

0 (0)

<

0.001 0.44

CVD history,

n

(%)

16 (9.3)

21 (11.3)

0.525 –0.07

24h hypertension,

n

(%)

a

114 (66)

81 (44)

<

0.001 0.43

Anti-hypertensive usage,

n

(%)

62 (35.8)

26 (14.0)

<

0.001 0.51

SBP

=

systolic blood pressure; DBP

=

diastolic blood pressure; PP

=

pulse pres-

sure; HIV

=

human immune-deficiency virus infection; CVD, cardiovascular

disease history.

a

Hypertensive status classified as 24-h SBP

130 mmHg and/or 24-h DBP

80

mmHg. Values are mean (± SD).

Table 2. Comparing qualitative and quantitative lifestyle changes over a three-year period in blacks and whites

Blacks (

n

=

173)

Whites (

n

=

186)

p

-values

d

-values

Qualitative attempts at lifestyle changes after 3 years

Smoking,

n

(%)

17 (10)

9 (5)

0.069

0.17

Alcohol consumption,

n

(%)

24 (14)

6 (3)

0.001

0.31

Diet,

n

(%)

40 (23)

36 (23)

0.383

0.09

Blacks (

n

=

173)

Whites (

n

=

186)

Baseline/

follow up

Difference

(95% CI)

p

-values

d

-values

Baseline/

follow up

Difference

(95% CI)

p

-values

d

-values

Quantitative lifestyle changes at 3-year follow up

Cotinine, ng/ml

27.0/33.1

6.0 (–3.3, 15.4)

0.203

0.27

24.1/21.6

–2.4 (–7.1, 2.2)

0.307

–0.03

γ

GT, U/l

67.6/60.9

–6.7 (–15.7, 2.2)

0.138

–0.08

28.0/27.1

–0.9 (–5.0, 3.1)

0.647

–0.03

WC, cm

93.7/98.1

4.3 (3.2, 5.6)

0.001

0.29

93.6/96.3

2.6 (1.6, 3.6)

0.001

0.16

γ

GT, gamma-glutamyl transferase; WC, waist circumference.

Values presented as arithmetic mean at baseline/follow up as well as the difference over three years (95% CI).

p

-values were obtained from dependent

t

-tests;

d

-value effects: 0.2

=

small; 0.5

=

medium; 0.9

=

large.