Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  45 / 74 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 45 / 74 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 29, No 6, November/December 2018

AFRICA

377

group (1.0 vs 6.0%,

p

<

0.001), which was mainly attributable to

the lower frequency of major bleeding in the TRI group (0.3 vs

3.8%,

p

<

0.001). However, there was no significant difference in

minor bleeding rates between the two groups (0.7 vs 2.1%,

p

=

0.126) (Table 3).

To identify independent predictors of MACE after successful

PCI in this registry, Cox proportional hazard regression analysis

was performed (Table 5). Significant independent predictors

were CKD (HR: 4.172, 95% CI: 1.822–9.551,

p

=

0.021) and

MVD (HR: 2.619, 95% CI: 1.146–4.843,

p

=

0.002). However,

TRI was not an independent predictor of MACE (HR: 1.106,

95% CI: 0.532–1.939,

p

=

0.963).

Subgroup analysis regardingMACEwas performed according

to older age (

65 years), gender, hypertension, diabetes mellitus,

dyslipidaemia, CKD, current smoker, history of IHD, history

of PAD, presence of NSTEMI and MVD. Results in the

various subgroups were similar to those observed in the entire

population (Fig. 3). There were no significant differences in

clinical outcomes between the two groups, and the results

were consistent across all subgroups, without any significant

interactional

p

-value.

Discussion

This study examined the role of vascular access site exclusively,

in patients with NSTE-ACS undergoing PCI from the KOTRI

registry, which is a large, observational cohort to describe the

association between clinical outcomes and bleeding complications

with TRI. The major findings of this analysis are: (1) the TRI

group had a lower rate of MACE and CD than the TFI group

Days

0

90

180

270

360

Cumulative incidence of CD

0.10

0.08

0.06

0.04

0.02

0.00

Log-rank

p

=

0.050

TRI

TFI

No. at Risk

TRI

983

914

889

860

517

TFI

302

278

257

248

179

Days

0

90

180

270

360

Cumulative incidence of MI

0.10

0.08

0.06

0.04

0.02

0.00

Log-rank

p

=

0.207

TRI

TFI

No. at Risk

TRI

983

912

888

858

514

TFI

302

279

258

250

180

Days

0

90

180

270

360

Cumulative incidence of RR

0.10

0.08

0.06

0.04

0.02

0.00

Log-rank

p

=

0.247

TRI

TFI

No. at Risk

TRI

983

910

879

843

498

TFI

302

277

253

245

172

Days

0

90

180

270

360

Cumulative incidence of MACE

0.10

0.08

0.06

0.04

0.02

0.00

Log-rank

p

=

0.045

TRI

TFI

No. at Risk

TRI

983

910

878

843

498

TFI

302

276

252

243

171

Fig. 1.

Kaplan–Meier curves of clinical outcomes at one year in the crude population. A. cardiac death; B. myocardial infarction; C.

repeat revascularisation; D. MACE. TRI

=

transradial intervention; TFI

=

transfemoral intervention; CD

=

cardiac death; MI

=

myocardial infarction; RR = repeat revascularisation; MACE

=

major adverse cardiovascular events.

A

C

B

D