Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  46 / 74 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 46 / 74 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 29, No 6, November/December 2018

378

AFRICA

in the crude population at one-year follow up; (2) there were no

significant differences in rate of MACE and CD between the

two groups after propensity-score matching; (3) rates of major

bleeding complications were lower in the TRI than the TFI

group in both the crude and matched populations; (4) CKD and

MVD were independent predictors of MACE in patients with

NSTE-ACS, suggesting that clinical and angiographic profiles

rather than vascular access site are important in determining

clinical outcomes after intervention for NSTE-ACS.

The increasing adoption of radial access currently has

led to the inevitable debate on preferred vascular access site.

Although recent ACCF/AHA/SCAI PCI practice guidelines

strongly recommend the radial approach,

13

adoption of radial

access for PCI has been variable in different countries.

2

For

example, the radial route is predominant in Canada, France and

Days

0

90

180

270

360

Cumulative incidence of CD

0.10

0.08

0.06

0.04

0.02

0.00

Log-rank

p

=

0.888

TRI

TFI

No. at Risk

TRI

624

585

567

550

324

TFI

241

223

207

199

144

Days

0

90

180

270

360

Cumulative incidence of MI

0.10

0.08

0.06

0.04

0.02

0.00

Log-rank

p

=

0.204

TRI

TFI

No. at Risk

TRI

624

584

567

549

321

TFI

241

223

207

200

144

Days

0

90

180

270

360

Cumulative incidence of RR

0.10

0.08

0.06

0.04

0.02

0.00

Log-rank

p

=

0.247

TRI

TFI

No. at Risk

TRI

624

582

561

539

314

TFI

241

221

202

195

138

Days

0

90

180

270

360

Cumulative incidence of MACE

0.10

0.08

0.06

0.04

0.02

0.00

Log-rank

p

=

0.333

TRI

TFI

No. at Risk

TRI

624

582

560

539

314

TFI

241

221

202

194

138

Fig. 2.

Kaplan–Meier curves of clinical outcomes at one year in the propensity-score matched population. A. cardiac death; B.

myocardial infarction; C. repeat revascularisation; D. MACE. TRI

=

transradial intervention; TFI

=

transfemoral intervention;

CD

=

cardiac death; MI

=

myocardial infarction; RR = repeat revascularisation; MACE

=

major adverse cardiovascular events.

A

C

B

D

Table 5. Independent predictors of MACE at one year

Univariate analysis

Multivariate analysis

HR (95% CI)

p

-value HR (95% CI)

p

-value

TRI

0.588

(0.347–0.995)

0.048

1.106

(0.532–1.939)

0.963

Diabetes mellitus

2.147

(1.305–3.533)

0.003

1.557

(0.913–2.656)

0.104

Chronic kidney disease

5.520

(2.877–10.591)

<

0.001

4.172

(1.822–9.551)

0.001

Multi-vessel disease

2.850

(1.546–5.254)

0.001

2.619

(1.416–4.843)

0.002

The following variables were considered in the model: TRI, older age (

65

years), gender, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidaemia, CKD, current

smoking, history of IHD, history of PAD, NSTEMI, multi-vessel disease (2VD

or 3VD). TRI

=

transradial intervention; IHD

=

ischaemic heart disease; PAD

=

peripheral artery disease; NSTEMI

=

non-ST-segment elevation myocardial

infarction; VD

=

vessel disease.