Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  45 / 64 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 45 / 64 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 31, No 6, November/December 2020

AFRICA

325

Commentary

PASCAR commentary on the International Society of

Hypertension global guidelines 2020: relevance to

sub-Saharan Africa

ESW Jones, Albertino Damasceno, Elijah N Ogola, Dike B Ojji, Anastase Dzudie, BL Rayner

Abstract

Hypertension guidelines have been based on country-specific

data until the publication of the International Society of

Hypertension (ISH) global guidelines. The major differences

between the ISH global guidelines and other international

guidelines are the stratified recommendations to accom-

modate differences in available resources between countries

and within countries. This is a key and novel proposal in the

new ISH guidelines. There is the separation of optimal versus

essential criteria for diagnosis and treatment according to

availability of resources. This guideline includes recommen-

dations for sub-Saharan Africa. The Pan-African Society of

Cardiology (PASCAR) continues to promote awareness and

recommendations on hypertension in Africa. This commen-

tary provides a summary and discussion of the global guide-

lines in order to clarify the position of PASCAR.

DOI: 10.5830/CVJA-2020-055

Most authoritative hypertension guidelines for the diagnosis and

management of elevated blood pressure have been developed for

specific regions or countries.

1-4

These guidelines have been based

on studies that were predominantly performed in high-income

countries (HICs), with the vast majority of participants being of

non-sub-Saharan African (non-SSA) origin.

2,5,6

No hypertension

cardiovascular (CV) outcome study has been performed in SSA.

Despite this, these international guidelines have been used to

develop management protocols for SSA.

Until 2017, guidelines were unanimous that the cut-off

point to diagnose hypertension was 140/90 mmHg, except

in the elderly where the systolic blood pressure (SBP) was

increased to 150 mmHg.

7-9

Based on this definition, the World

Health Organisation (WHO) estimated that Africa had the

highest prevalence of hypertension.

10

The Pan-African Society

of Cardiology (PASCAR) hypertension roadmap

11

similarly

used this diagnostic threshold. However, in 2017, the American

College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association

(AHA) revised their hypertension guidelines with radical changes,

including lower cut-off points for the diagnosis of hypertension

(BP ≥ 130/80 mmHg).

Implications of these changes include an additional 31 million

US individuals considered to have hypertension, just because of

this change in threshold.

1

The lowering of the threshold of

hypertension diagnosis was not replicated in the 2018 guidelines

from the European Society of Hypertension (ESH)/European

Society of Cardiology (ESC), which maintained the previously

set 140/90 mmHg.

2

In 2018, the International Society of Hypertension (ISH)

questioned whether the ACC/AHA high blood pressure

guidelines were fit for global purpose, especially in low- and

middle-income countries (LMICs).

12

In 2020, the ISH published

global hypertension practice guidelines, which have great

relevance to SSA. Specific detail for the manner to achieve

hypertension control is based on the needs, available resources

and practice behaviours of a given population. This commentary

aims to clarify the position of PASCAR on these global practice

guidelines and their relevance to SSA.

Why do we have guidelines?

Before commenting on the ISH hypertension guidelines, it is

important to consider why we need guidelines. The principles

were particularly well summarised by Go

et al

.

13

Briefly, they

are required to identify people eligible for management; for

monitoring at practice and population level; for increasing

patient and provider awareness; providing an effective diagnosis

and treatment plan; systematic follow up for initiation and

Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Groote Schuur

Hospital; Kidney and Hypertension Research Unit,

University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa

ESW Jones,MB BCh, FCP (SA), Cert Nephrol, PhD,

eswjones@gmail.com

BL Rayner, MB ChB, FCP, MMed, PhD

Faculty of Medicine, Eduardo Mondlane University;

Research Unit, Department of Medicine, Maputo Central

Hospital, Maputo, Mozambique

Albertino Damasceno, MD

College of Health Sciences, University of Nairobi, Kenya

Elijah N Ogola,MD

Cardiology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine,

University of Abuja and University of Abuja Teaching

Hospital, Gwagwalada, Abuja, Nigeria

Dike B Ojji, MD

Cardiology and Cardiac Pacing Unit, Service of Internal

Medicine, Douala General Hospital, Douala, Cameroon

Anastase Dzudie,MD