Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  50 / 64 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 50 / 64 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 31, No 6, November/December 2020

330

AFRICA

Comparison of Dual therapies for lowering blood pressure in black

Africans.

N Engl J Med

2019;

380

(25): 2429–2439.

20. Ogah OS, Rayner BL. Recent advances in hypertension in sub-Saharan

Africa.

Heart

2013;

99

(19): 1390–1397.

21. Akintunde A, Nondi J, Gogo K, Jones ESW, Rayner BL, Hackam DG,

et al

. Physiological phenotyping for personalized therapy of uncon-

trolled hypertension in Africa.

Am J Hypertens

2017;

30

(9): 923–930.

22. Twagirumukiza M, Annemans L, Kips JG, Bienvenu E, van Bortel LM.

Prices of antihypertensive medicines in sub-Saharan Africa and align-

ment to WHO’s model list of essential medicines.

Trop Med Int Health

2010;

15

(3): 350–361.

23. Damasceno A, Ferreira B, Patel S, Sevene E, Polónia J. Efficacy of

captopril and nifedipine in black and white patients with hypertensive

crisis.

J Hum Hypertens

1997;

11

(8): 471–476.

24. Wearne N, Davidson B, Blockman M, Swart A, Jones ES. HIV, drugs

and the kidney.

Drugs Context

2020; 9.

25. Van Zoest RA, van den Born BH, Reiss P. Hypertension in people living

with HIV.

Curr Opin HIV AIDS

2017;

12

(6): 513–522.

Elderly may benefit from more invasive treatment: large seven-year study

Elderly patients suffering the most common type of heart

attack may benefit from more invasive treatment, research

has shown. The study draws on data captured over seven

years from 1 500 patients aged 80 years or over. It was

conducted by researchers from the National Institute of

Health Research Health Informatics Collaborative (NIHR-

HIC), led by Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust and

Imperial College London.

The research looks at elderly patients admitted to hospital

with a non-ST-segment elevated myocardial infarction

(NSTEMI). It found patients who underwent invasive

treatment with a coronary angiogram, followed up with

bypass surgery or coronary stenting as appropriate, had higher

survival rates than those who were treated with medication

alone. Patients who had coronary angiograms were also less

likely to be re-admitted to hospital with a second heart attack

or heart failure.

Coronary angiograms are specialist X-rays to identify

blockages in the blood supply to the heart. They can help a

clinician determine the cause of an NSTEMI and decide on

effective treatment, such as increasing blood flow through a

coronary stent or bypass grafting.

Previous trials have shown increased survival rates in

younger patients with NSTEMI following invasive treatment,

but there has been conflicting evidence as to whether these

benefits extend into patients over 80 years. Only 38% of

NSTEMI patients in this older age group currently receive

invasive treatment, compared to 78% of the under 60 years.

Dr Amit Kaura, lead author of the research, British

Heart Foundation clinical research fellow and NIHR clinical

research fellow with the National Heart and Lung Institute at

Imperial College London explained: ‘Because there has been

no clear consensus on how best to manage elderly patients

with this type of heart attack, many doctors have erred on

the side of caution, not wanting to risk complications in their

more vulnerable patients. These results show they can now

be more confident of the benefits that invasive treatment can

bring for this group.’

The study, funded by the NIHR Imperial Biomedical

Research Centre, identified just under 2 000 patients aged

over 80 years who were diagnosed with an NSTEMI at five

hospitals between 2010 and 2017. To ensure the robustness

of the study, the researchers used sophisticated statistical

techniques to apply the kind of criteria used in a clinical trial,

to determine which of these patients would be included in the

analysis. In total, 1 500 patients were included, with just over

half having invasive treatment. After five years, 31% of those

in the invasive treatment group had died, compared to 61%

in the non-invasive group.

The team estimates that if all patients had received

invasive treatment, just 36% would have died, compared to

55% if all had received non-invasive treatment. These figures

take into account over 70 variables that might have affected

prognosis, such as other medical conditions.

The analysis also showed that patients were at no greater

risk of stroke or bleeding if they received invasive treatment,

as there were similar rates across both groups. Patients who

had invasive treatment were also a third less likely to be

re-admitted to hospital for heart failure or heart attack.

Kaura said: ‘The gold standard is to base treatment

decisions on evidence from randomised control trials, but

that doesn’t yet exist for this group of patients. In the interim,

we’ve done the next best thing, by looking at retrospective

data gathered from these five large hospitals and using it

like a clinical trial. The results are clear: clinicians should

positively consider invasive management for any patients

over 80 diagnosed with an NSTEMI.’

The data used in the study was gathered through the

National Institute for Health Research Health Informatics

Collaborative (NIHR-HIC), which involves: Imperial College

Healthcare NHS Trust, Oxford University Hospitals NHS

Foundation Trust, University College London Hospitals NHS

Foundation Trust, King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation

Trust and Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust.

Source:

Medical Brief 2020