Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  5 / 60 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 5 / 60 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 32, No 2, March/April 2021

AFRICA

59

Editorial

Atrial high-rates episodes: fact or fiction?

Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) with atrial-lead

sensing afford clinicians a unique opportunity for continuous

heart-rhythm monitoring and the detection of atrial high-rate

episodes (AHREs). AHREs are recorded as atrial electrograms

(EGMs) and stored by CIEDs (date, number and duration of

these episodes are recorded). In this issue of the journal, Simu

and colleagues (page 102) have written an excellent review to

guide physicians and cardiac technologists who are faced with

interpreting and managing this relatively new entity.

1

Several

aspects of this review need to be highlighted.

Clinicians need to be aware of the definition regarding timing

and duration of an AHRE. The current 2020 European Society

of Cardiology atrial fibrillation guideline defines AHRE as

an atrial rate ≥175 beats per minute with a duration of at least

five minutes, while the European Heart Rhythm Association

(EHRA) consensus statement refers to higher atrial rates, > 190

beat per minute.

2-4

While the absolute atrial rate is not important, at these high

rates, AHREs are usually due to atrial fibrillation (AF), atrial

flutter or other atrial tachyarrhythmias. AHREs are usually

clinically silent, brief, and occur without a prior confirmed

diagnosis of AF or atrial tachycardia (AT). Paroxysmal episodes

of symptomatic AF, previously confirmed on a Holter or

electrocardiogram (so-called clinical AF), should not be classified

as an AHRE and have different clinical and management

implications as these patients are likely to have higher AF

burdens. The term subclinical AF can be also be used to describe

these AHREs in an asymptomatic patient and the terms can be

used interchangeably.

It must be noted that not all AHREs classified by the CIED

as AT or AF are due to AF or even an AT. This finding was

highlighted from the ASSERT (ASymptomatic atrial fibrillation

and Stroke Evaluation in pacemaker patients and the atrial

fibrillation Reduction atrial pacing) trial, which reported 17.3%

false positives when 6 000 AHREs were reviewed.

5

These

findings highlight the requirement that all EGMs be reviewed to

exclude false positives such as far-field oversensing of the T or R

waves, myopotentials, premature atrial ectopics, electromagnetic

interference on the atrial lead and other supraventricular

tachycardias. Examples of AHREs are shown in Figs 1 and 2.

As most patients are asymptomatic during AHREs, episodes

are often discovered incidentally at a routine pacemaker clinic.

Technologists and clinicians should always perform a detailed

CIED interrogation and review CIED diagnostics carefully to

classify AHREs. This is important as the incidence of AHREs

not due to AF is relatively high. In patients 65 years of age or

older without a prior history of AF, AHREs are detected in 10%

of subjects by three months of device implantation, in 24% by one

year and in 34% by two years.

6,7

If home monitoring is available,

downloads of transmissions must be reviewed on a regular basis. It

is important to emphasise that AHREs progress to clinical AF in

16% of patients over a 2.5-year period and should prompt closer

follow up of these patients, preferably with home monitoring.

6

There are still many unanswered questions with regard to the

clinical implications of AHREs. It is increasingly recognised that

AHREs are associated with an increased risk of stroke. However,

this finding comes mainly from the ASSERT trial, which was

the only trial that did not include patients with a prior history

of AF.

6

Therefore the burden of AF may have been higher in all

studies where prior clinical AF was recorded, with the finding that

AHREs (in the absence of prior clinical AF) increase the risk of

stroke, based on a single study. The lower burden of AF in patients

with AHRE/subclinical AF can explain the lower absolute

thromboembolic risk seen with AHRE compared to clinical AF.

Atrial marker channel

Atrial EGM: A tip to ring

Ventricular EGM: RV tip to ring

Ventricular marker channel

Fig. 1.

Intracardiac EGMs and marker channels depicting an AHRE consistent with AF. The box indicates bipolar sensing of the

atrial lead with irregular fast atrial EGMs indicative of AF.