Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  27 / 67 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 27 / 67 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Vol 24, No 2, March 2013

AFRICA

25

The SOMANZ (Society of Obstetric Medicine of Australia

and New Zealand) classification and definitions of hypertensive

disorders of pregnancy were used.

12

However, for this research

purpose, the diagnosis of pre-eclampsia was based only on

hypertension and proteinuria from 20 weeks of gestation.

Proteinuria was considered as urine dipstick protein of 1+ or

more (on two occasions at least) or a 24-hour urine protein of

at least 300 mg. In addition, only women whose high blood

pressure had returned to normal values within a week of delivery

were included in the study to rule out chronic hypertension.

All women are offered counselling and voluntary testing for

HIV at these hospital sites as the standard of care. Institutional

ethical and hospital regulatory permission was obtained for the

study (Biomedical Research Ethics Committee, University of

KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa; reference number BE 151/010).

In the province of KwaZulu-Natal, the HIV/AIDS infection

rate in pregnant women is 40%.

10

Assuming a reduction in HIV

rate from 40% in controls to 25% in cases (pre-eclamptics), 890

women (445 cases and 445 controls) were required to achieve a

study power of 80% with statistical significance of

p

<

0.05. This

sample size was also estimated by assuming that the proportion

of HIV-infected women with a CD

4

cell count

<

200 cells/

µ

l

(immune-compromised) would be lower among pre-eclamptics.

Statistical analysis

SPSS version 18 was used to analyse the data. A

p

-value

<

0.05

was considered statistically significant. Pearson’s Chi-square

tests were used to compare categorical variables between cases

and controls, while

t

-tests were used to compare quantitative

variables between the two groups if the data were normally

distributed. Mann–Whitney tests were used if the data were

skewed. Binary logistic regression analysis was conducted in

order to assess the adjusted odds ratio for HIV status according

to the age and parity difference between the groups.

Results

There was a total of 23 988 deliveries over the study period at the

two study sites. Among them, 1 892 women were identified with

a diagnosis of pre-eclampsia (including imminent eclampsia, and

eclampsia).

Data were collected from 500 cases (pre-eclamptics) and

500 controls (normotensive healthy pregnant women) who met

the inclusion criteria. Among the pre-eclamptics, eight cases

had information missing from their files (birth weight and/or

gestational age at delivery) and were therefore excluded. Finally,

492 cases were used for analysis. The maternal age of the two

groups are shown in Table 1.

The rate of HIV infection in the pre-eclamptic group was

26.4%. In the control group, the HIV infection rate was 36.6%

(OR

=

0.62, 95% CI: 0.47–0.82,

p

=

0.001) (Table 2).

Pre-eclamptic women were 38% less likely to be HIV

infected than the control group without pre-eclampsia. Because

the cases and controls were not exactly age and parity matched,

the difference between them in HIV infection rate was adjusted

for this confounding factors using logistic regression analysis.

The odds ratio of being a case (pre-eclamptic) compared to a

control was 0.658 for HIV negative (

p

=

0.005) after adjustment.

This means that HIV-infected women were 34.2% less likely to

develop pre-eclampsia than women not infected with HIV.

The results of the CD

4

counts were available in only 66 cases

(pre-eclamptics) and 75 controls.

In women with pre-eclampsia, the median CD

4

count was 304

cells/

µ

l with a maximum of 906 cells/

µ

l and a minimum of 10

cells/

µ

l, versus 208 cells/

µ

l with a maximum of 725 cells/

µ

l and

a minimum of 56 cells/

µ

l in the control group (

p

=

0.008). The

proportion of pre-eclamptic women with

3+ protein was higher

in the HIV-negative group (39.2%) than in the HIV-positive

group (27.9%) (

p

=

0.022).

Discussion

As far as we know, this is the first study to report the rate of HIV

infection in women with pre-eclampsia in comparison with a

control group without pre-eclampsia. Most studies on HIV and

pre-eclampsia have compared the rate of pre-eclampsia between

uninfected and HIV-infected women.

4,7-9

The rate of HIV/AIDS infection was lower in pre-eclamptic

women than in the control group. These findings suggest that

women with pre-eclampsia are less likely to be affected by

HIV infection than the general population. In other words,

HIV infection being the exposure and pre-eclampsia being the

outcome variable, HIV-infected women are at a lower risk of

developing pre-eclampsia. Our findings also suggest that HIV

infection could have a protective effect against the development

of pre-eclampsia.

The underlying mechanism of the protective effect of HIV

infection is unclear. As postulated in our hypothesis, it is possibly

associated with immune suppression in HIV-infected women.

To further evaluate this association, the level of immunity

(as expressed by the CD

4

count) between the two groups was

compared. The CD

4

count result, however, was available in only

66 cases and 75 controls. The median CD

4

count was lower in the

control group without pre-eclampsia (median CD

4

count

=

208

cells/

µ

l) than in the pre-eclamptic women (median CD

4

count

=

304 cells/

µ

l) (

p

=

0.008). This suggests that among HIV-infected

women, the immunity was less affected in those who developed

pre-eclampsia.

We also found that the proportion of pre-eclamptic women

with +3 protein or more in their urine dipstick was higher in

TABLE 2. HIV RATE IN CASESAND CONTROL GROUP

HIV positive

n

(%)

HIV negative

n

(%)

Total

n

(%)

Control group

183 (36.6)*

317 (63.4)

500 (100)

Pre-eclamptic group 130 (26.4)*

362 (73.6)

492 (100)

Total

313 (31.6)

679 (68.4)

992 (100)

*

p

=

0.001; OR

=

0.62; 95% CI: 0.47–0.82.

TABLE 1. MATERNALAGE DISTRIBUTION

IN CASESAND CONTROL GROUP

Age

< 20

years,

n

(%)

20–29

years,

n

(%)

30–39

years,

n

(%)

40

years,

n

(%)

Mean

age

(years)

Total,

n

(%)

Controls

147

(29.4)

210

(42.0)

116

(23.2)

27

(5.4)

25.25 500

(100%)

Pre-eclamptics 145

(20.4)

250

(50.6)

93

(18.8)

6

(1.2)

24.09 492

(100%)

Total

292

(29.4)

460

(46.3)

209

(21.9)

33

(3.3)

24.67 992

(100%)