Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  34 / 64 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 34 / 64 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 27, No 1, January/February 2016

32

AFRICA

Complete vascular rings may be divided into four major

configurations, with double aortic arch being the most frequent

variation encountered, followed by right aortic arch with

aberrant left subclavian artery and left ligamentum.

2

Innominate

artery compression and pulmonary vascular slings are other

configurations infrequently seen.

2,3

Double aortic arches may

present with earlier clinical symptoms than other configurations.

2

In a symptomatic patient with a vascular ring, the plain

chest radiograph will invariably demonstrate some abnormality.

1

On the frontal film, the presence of a right aortic arch, right

descending aorta or focal tracheal indentation should be noted,

while the lateral chest radiograph may illustrate anterior tracheal

bowing, increased retrotracheal soft tissue opacification, as well

as focal tracheal narrowing.

1,4

A high kV magnification technique

may be used to exclude tracheal narrowing on the plain chest

radiograph.

4

The aortic arch may not be clearly visualised on

frontal CXR in infants due to obscuration by the thymic shadow.

3

Although useful to prompt further imaging, these signs

are not useful to identify the specific type of vascular ring

configuration. The frontal CXR mediastinal silhouette of any

child with aerodigestive tract symptoms should always be

carefully scrutinised despite an apparently obvious alternative

aetiology, such as a foreign body.

6

The contrast oesophagogram is useful to exclude the presence

of a vascular ring, particularly in patients with persistent asthma

or aspiration symptoms unresponsive to standard treatment.

3

A

persistent, extrinsic pulsatile indentation seen in multiple views

during a contrast study of the oesophagus (generally laterally

with double aortic arches and anteriorly with pulmonary artery

sling) is highly suggestive of a vascular ring, while a normal

study effectively excludes the diagnosis of a vascular ring.

4

Occasionally an alternative diagnosis, such as aspiration or

tracheo-oesophageal fistula, may be identified.

3

CO is widely available, cheap and relatively non-invasive,

all important characteristics in underdeveloped areas of South

Africa, where access to advanced imaging may require referral to

a tertiary centre a significant distance away.

While CXR and CO may confirm the presence of a vascular

ring, cross-sectional imaging is required to confirm the specific

configuration of the ring and enable surgical planning, and

to exclude another cause of a fixed extrinsic oesophageal

indentation, such as a mediastinal foregut duplication cyst.

5,6

Detailed cross-sectional imaging, in the form of computed

tomography angiography or magnetic resonance imaging, is

Fig. 1.

Red herrings. (A) The postero-anterior and (B) lateral plain chest radiographs illustrate the ingested coin in the oesophagus,

superimposed on a widened superior mediastinal silhouette. The stridor persisted following extraction of the coin, prompting

a computed tomography angiogram (CTA) that confirmed a double aortic arch.

A

B

Fig. 2.

Double aortic arch. This axial CTA image illustrates the

characteristic appearance of a double aortic arch, with

both arches widely patent and contrast enhanced. The LA

and RA encircle the oesophagus and trachea (asterisk) to

form a complete vascular ring. LA: left arch; RA: right arch.