Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  23 / 76 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 23 / 76 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 29, No 3, May/June 2018

AFRICA

153

loss, rather than excessive collagen deposition secondary to

activation of Kallikrin–Kinin system, and thereby, of bradykinin,

which increases MMP activity, causing loss of collagen, and LV

dysfunction, as shown in an animal model.

29

The predominance

of degradation over synthesis results in loss and disruption

of the myocardial collagen scaffold and an associated decline

in matrix tensile strength, resulting in ventricular dilatation,

systolic dysfunction and ultimately death.

14

In this study, patients with CRMR had increased collagen

degradation, as suggested by increase in MMP activity and

normal levels of TIMPs and markers of collagen synthesis. This

finding supports the lack of myocardial fibrosis observed in our

study. These findings differ from the study by Banerjee

et al

. in

30 patients with CRMR, where they found an increased level

of biomarkers of synthesis and degradation.

13

The discrepancy

may be explained by: younger patients than in this study (mean

age 29.6

±

2 years), possible ongoing rheumatic activity, and the

inclusion of patients with atrial fibrillation, therefore resulting in

increased biomarker levels.

13

The use of anti-remodelling therapy was similar in our study

to that of Banerjee

et al

.

13

Thirty to 40% of their patients were

on anti-remodelling therapy with spironolactone and ACE

inhibitors, respectively, and 10% were on beta-blockers. In their

study, only biopsies of the leaflets were performed, not the

LV to assess the absence or presence of fibrosis. Furthermore,

they reported increased thickness of the leaflets and collagen

deposition in eight patients who underwent surgery. It is unclear,

however, as to whether the primary lesion was mitral stenosis or

MR in this subset of patients.

Moreover, there was increased MMP activity in their MR

patients compared to mitral stenosis, as well as increased

MMP-to-TIMP ratio. They acknowledge that the elevation

in PIP levels was lower than anticipated in their MR cohort,

and that markers of collagen degradation exceeded markers of

synthesis in their patients with CRMR.

The main limitation of this study was the small sample size. A

larger sample size would have reduced the probability of chance

accounting for the absence or presence of fibrosis. A study with a

larger sample size with isolated MR and one with co-morbidities

and MR may be required to account for the finding of fibrosis

secondary to isolated MR. T1 mapping was not used to exclude

the presence of microscopic fibrosis and LV biopsies were not

performed.

Conclusion

The occurrence of LV fibrosis by LGE imaging was low in

CRMR patients. This finding corroborates the increased level

of biomarkers of collagen degradation and normal levels of

biomarkers of collagen synthesis. These findings may have

implications in terms of therapy. Earlier surgical referral may

be of benefit before dissolution of the myocardial scaffold and

irreversible myocardial damage ensues, with resultant poor

postoperative LV function.

Dr Meel was the recipient of the Carnegie PhD Fellowship award (Carnegie

Corporation Grant No. b8749.r01). We thank Hiral Matioda and Claudia

dos Santos for their help in acquisition of echocardiographic images, Janet

Mazibuko for her help with meticulous processing and storage of blood samples,

and Raquel Duarte for procuring laboratory consumables and biomarker kits.

References

1.

Doltra A, Hoyem Amundsen B, Gebker R, Fleck E, Kelle S. Emerging

concepts for myocardial late gadolinium enhancement MRI.

Curr

Cardiol Rev

2013;

9

: 185–190. PMID: 23909638.

2.

Barone-Rochette G, Piérard S, de Ravenstein CD, Seldrum S, Melchior

J, Maes F,

et al.

Prognostic significance of LGE by CMR in aortic steno-

sis patients undergoing valve replacement.

J Am Coll Cardiol

2014;

64

:

144–154. PMID: 25011718.

3.

Khan R, Sheppard R. Fibrosis in heart disease: understanding the role

of transforming growth factor‐

β

1 in cardiomyopathy, valvular disease

and arrhythmia.

Immunology

2006; 118: 10–24. PMID: 16630019.

4.

Edwards NC, Moody WE, Yuan M, Weale P, Neal D, Townend JN,

et al

. Quantification of left ventricular interstitial fibrosis in asympto-

matic chronic primary degenerative mitral regurgitation.

Circ Cardiovasc

Imaging

2014;

7

: 946–953. PMID: 25140067.

5.

Hoffmann R, Altiok E, Friedman Z, Becker M, Frick M. Myocardial

deformation imaging by two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiog-

raphy in comparison to late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic

resonance for analysis of myocardial fibrosis in severe aortic stenosis.

Am J Cardiol

2014; 114: 1083–1088. PMID: 25212549.

6.

Essop MR, Wisenbaugh T, Sareli P. Evidence against a myocardial

factor as the cause of left ventricular dilation in active rheumatic cardi-

tis.

J Am Coll Cardiol

1993; 22: 826–829. PMID: 8354818.

7.

Barlow JB.

Perspectives on the mitral valve

. FA Davis Company, 1987:

240–243.

8.

Stollerman GH.

Rheumatic Fever and Streptococcal Infection

. New

York: Grune & Stratton Inc, 1975: 123.

9.

Choi EY, Yoon SJ, Lim SH, Choi BW, Ha JW, Shin DH,

et al

. Detection

of myocardial involvement of rheumatic heart disease with contrast-

enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

Int J Cardiol

2006; 113: e36–38.

PMID: 16759716.

10. Sepulveda DL, Calado EB, Albuquerque E, Rodrigues A, Siqueira ME,

Lapa C,

et al

. Cardiac magnetic resonance in acute rheumatic fever.

J

Cardiovasc Magn Reson

2013;

15

: O23. DOI: 10.1186/1532-429X-15-

S1-O23.

11. Hezzell MJ, Falk T, Olsen LH, Boswood A, Elliott J. Associations

between N-terminal procollagen type III, fibrosis and echocardiograph-

ic indices in dogs that died due to myxomatous mitral valve disease.

J

Vet Cardiol

2014;

16

: 257–264. PMID: 25292459.

12. Verheule S, Wilson E, Everett T, Shanbhag S, Golden C, Olgin

J. Alterations in atrial electrophysiology and tissue structure in a

canine model of chronic atrial dilatation due to mitral regurgitation.

Circulation

2003;

107

: 2615–2622. PMID: 12732604.

13. Banerjee T, Mukherjee S, Ghosh S, Biswas M, Dutta S, Pattari S,

et al

.

Clinical significance of markers of collagen metabolism in rheumatic

mitral valve disease.

PloS one

2014;

9

: e90527. PMID: 24603967.

14. López B, González A, Díez J. Circulating biomarkers of collagen

metabolism in cardiac diseases.

Circulation

2010; 121: 1645–1654.

PMID: 20385961.

15. Braunwald E. Biomarkers in heart failure.

N Engl J Med

2008;

358

:

2148–2159. PMID: 18480207.

16. Spinale FG, Coker ML, Bond BR, Zellner JL. Myocardial matrix degra-

dation and metalloproteinase activation in the failing heart: a potential

therapeutic target.

Cardiovasc Res

2000; 46: 225–238. PMID: 10773226.

17. Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, Afilalo J, Armstrong A, Ernande

L,

et al

. Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by

echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of

Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular

Imaging.

J Am Soc Echocardiogr

2015; 28: 1–39. PMID: 25559473.

18. Nagueh SF, Smiseth OA, Appleton CP, Byrd B, Dokainish H, Edvardsen