Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  24 / 76 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 24 / 76 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 29, No 3, May/June 2018

154

AFRICA

T,

et al

. Recommendations for the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic

function by echocardiography: an update from the American Society

of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular

Imaging.

J Am Soc Echocardiogr

2016;

29

: 277–314. PMID: 27037982.

19. Reményi B, Wilson N, Steer A, Ferreira B, Kado J, Kumar K,

et al

.

World Heart Federation criteria for echocardiographic diagnosis of

rheumatic heart disease – an evidence-based guideline.

Nature Rev

Cardiol

2012;

9

: 297–309. PMID: 22371105.

20. Zoghbi WA, Enriquez-Sarano M, Foster E, Grayburn PA, Kraft CD,

Levine RA,

et al

. American Society of Echocardiography: recommenda-

tions for evaluation of the severity of native valvular regurgitation with

two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography.

Eur Heart J Cardiovasc

Imaging

2003;

4

: 237-61. DOI: 10.1016/S0894-7317(03)00335-3.

21. Lancellotti P, Tribouilloy C, Hagendorff A, Popescu BA, Edvardsen T,

Pierard LA,

et al

. Recommendations for the echocardiographic assessment

of native valvular regurgitation: an executive summary from the European

Association of Cardiovascular Imaging.

Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging

2013;

14

(7): 611–644. DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jet105. PMID: 23733442.

22. Kim RJ, Wu E, Rafael A, Chen EL, Parker MA, Simonetti O,

et al.

The use of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to identify

reversible myocardial dysfunction.

N Engl J Med

2000;

343

: 1445–1453.

PMID: 11078769.

23. Hudsmith LE, Petersen SE, Francis JM, Robson MD, Neubauer S.

Normal human left and right ventricular and left atrial dimensions using

steady state free precession magnetic resonance imaging.

J Cardiovasc

Magn Reson

2005;

7

: 775–782. PMID: 16353438.

24. Karamitsos TD, Hudsmith LE, Selvanayagam JB, Neubauer S, Francis

JM. Operator induced variability in left ventricular measurements

with cardiovascular magnetic resonance is improved after training.

J

Cardiovasc Magn Reson

2007;

9

: 777–783. PMID: 17891615.

25. Schulz-Menger J, Bluemke DA, Bremerich J, Flamm SD, Fogel MA,

FriedrichMG,

et al.

Standardized image interpretation and post process-

ing in cardiovascular magnetic resonance: Society for Cardiovascular

Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) board of trustees task force on stand-

ardized post processing.

J Cardiovasc Magn Reson

2013;

15

: 1. DOI:

10.1186/1532-429X-15-35.

26. Van de Heyning CM, Magne J, Piérard LA, Bruyère PJ, Davin L, de

Maeyer,

et al

. Late gadolinium enhancement CMR in primary mitral

regurgitation.

Eur J Clin Invest

2014;

44

: 840–847. PMID: 25066426.

27. Ho CY, López B, Coelho-Filho OR, Lakdawala NK, Cirino AL, Jarolim

P,

et al

. Myocardial fibrosis as an early manifestation of hypertrophic

cardiomyopathy.

N Engl J Med

2010;

363

: 552–563. PMID: 20818890.

28. Chemaly ER, Kang S, Zhang S, McCollum L, Chen J, Bénard L,

et al.

Differential patterns of replacement and reactive fibrosis in pressure and

volume overload are related to the propensity for ischaemia and involve

resistin.

J Physiol

2013;

591

: 5337–55. PMID: 24018949.

29. Wei CC, Chen Y, Powell LC, Zheng J, Shi K, Bradley WE,

et al

. Cardiac

kallikrein–kinin system is upregulated in chronic volume overload and

mediates an inflammatory induced collagen loss.

PloS one

2012;

7

:

e40110. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040110.

Next-generation cardiac pump improves outcomes, cuts costs

In a presentation at the annual meeting of the Heart

Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology,

investigators from Brigham and Women’s Hospital recently

presented evidence that a next-generation cardiac pump

device not only improves long-term outcomes but may also

decrease cost of care over time for heart failure patients.

The research team analysed results from the

MOMENTUM 3 trial, which compared two devices: the

HeartMate II (current generation) and HeartMate 3 (a novel,

centrifugal-flow pump), both manufactured by Abbott Inc,

which sponsored the study.

‘The HeartMate 3 left-ventricular assist device (LVAD)

is a more forgiving pump in terms of clinical adverse events,

and now we can confirm that its increased effectiveness is

associated with decreased costs,’ said Dr Mandeep Mehra,

executive director of the Centre for Advanced Heart Disease

and medical director of the Heart & Vascular Centre at

Brigham and Women’s Hospital. ‘In medicine, most often,

a therapy that demonstrates increased effectiveness usually

comes at a higher price, and we are able to show that this new

technology actually decreases costs to payers and patients

over time.’

Mehra and colleagues found that the newer device

reduced costs due to re-hospitalisation by 51%, largely driven

by a decrease in stroke and pump malfunction requiring

re-operation due to pump thrombosis. Patients who received

the HeartMate 3 experienced fewer hospitalisations and, on

average, spent 8.3 fewer days in the hospital per year than

those who received the HeartMate II. The authors note

that it may be possible to further reduce costs by decreasing

outlier complications and reducing hospital length of stay

and decrease early complications by improving patient

selection criteria and considering this therapy before patients

get too sick.

In April, Abbott Inc issued a field safety notice regarding

HeartMate 3 outflow graft twist complications with

an incidence rate of 0.72%. The US Food and Drug

Administration (FDA) issued a Class I recall but did not

recommend the return of LVADs or avoidance of use in new

patients. The current study re-reviewed 20 hospitalisations

(five in the HeartMate 3 and 15 in the HeartMate II

populations) and in a conservative analysis, classified them

as being device-related for the purposes of this analysis.

Nonetheless, the data still demonstrated a reduction in

re-hospitalisation-related hospital days and significant cost

savings for the HeartMate 3 compared to the HeartMate II.

Source:

Medical Brief 2018