Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  34 / 76 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 34 / 76 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 29, No 3, May/June 2018

164

AFRICA

statistically significant difference. However, a significant

difference was observed in hyperaemia diameter in favour of

rosuvastatin (Table 4).

Percentage changes in non-invasive brachial artery

measurements after 12 months of treatment were compared

between the two groups. A statistically significant difference was

found in percentage change in the rosuvastatin group’s brachial

artery post-nitrate diameter (

p

<

0.05). Non-significant changes

were found in the basal diameter and hyperaemia velocity in

favour of the rosuvastatin group (

p

=

0.089 and

p

=

0.088,

respectively) (Table 5).

Discussion

This study revealed that both atorvastatin and rosuvastatin had

an effect on baseline lipid values, brachial artery basal diameter

and hyperaemia diameter, and FMD and EID measurements.

Comparing 12-month non-invasivemeasurements of atorvastatin

and rosuvastatin groups, it was found that the statins had

similar effects on endothelial function in the subjects with

hyperlipidaemia.

Post-nitrate diameter in the rosuvastatin group was

significantly improved at the end of the 12-month treatment

compared to baseline values. Endothelial dysfunction is one of

the early functional markers of atherosclerosis.

11,12

Preventative

measurements should be taken before clinical manifestation

of atherosclerotic events. For this reason, detection of early

atherosclerotic changes is of great importance in reducing risk

factors. Endothelial dysfunction can be detected via FMD, a

Table 1. Post-treatment versus baseline values in the atorvastatin group

Atorvastatin

Baseline

mean

±

(SD)

12-month

mean

±

(SD)

p

-value

*

Basal diameter (mm)

4.0

±

0.6

4.1

±

0.6

0.045

Hyperaemia diameter (mm)

4.2

±

0.6

4.3

±

0.6

0.436

NTG diameter (mm)

4.5

±

0.6

4.7

±

0.6

0.002

FMD (%)

8.5

±

3.3

10.4

±

4.1

<

0.001

EID (%)

15.5

±

5.1

16.3

±

4.8

0.143

TC (mg/dl)

(mmol/l)

261.3

±

28.3

(6.77

±

0.73)

174.3

±

38.9

(4.51

±

1.01)

<

0.001

TG (mg/dl)

(mmol/l)

161.8

±

66

(1.83

±

0.75)

131.9

±

50

(1.49

±

0.57)

<

0.001

LDL-C (mg/dl)

(mmol/l)

176.8

±

23.5

(4.58

±

0.61)

92.9

±

28.1

(2.41

±

0.73)

<

0.001

HDL-C (mg/dl)

(mmol/l)

54.7

±

12.1

(1.42

±

0.31)

54.4

±

12.4

(1.41

±

0.32)

0.145

AST (U/l)

23.8

±

9.1

21.9

±

5.6

0.068

ALT (U/l)

23.6

±

12.8

24.1

±

13.1

0.746

CPK (U/l)

136.8

±

74

113.4

±

67

0.427

*Student’s

t

-test,

p

<

0.05.

SD: standard deviation; NTG: post-nitrate; FMD: flow-mediated dilation; EID:

endothelium-independent dilation; AST: aspartate transaminase; ALT: alanine

transaminase; CPK: creatinine phosphokinase; TG: triglycerides; TC: total

cholesterol; LDL-C: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-C: high-density

lipoprotein cholesterol.

Table 2. Post-treatment versus baseline values in the rosuvastatin group

Rosuvastatin

Baseline

12 months

p

-value

*

Basal diameter (mm)

4.0

±

0.5

4.2

±

0.5

0.003

Hyperaemia diameter (mm)

4.4

±

0.5

4.6

±

0.5

<

0.001

NTG diameter (mm)

4.6

±

0.5

4.7

±

0.5

0.687

FMD (%)

9.7

±

3.4

12.7

±

3.7

<

0.001

EID (%)

16.8

±

5.8

18.2

±

5.8

0.105

TC (mg/dl)

(mmol/l)

271.2

±

35.7

(7.02

±

0.92)

188.4

±

44.8

(4.88

±

1.16)

<

0.001

TG (mg/dl)

(mmol/l)

173.5

±

55.2

(1.96

±

0.62)

143

±

54.1

(1.62

±

0.61)

<

0.001

LDL-C (mg/dl)

(mmol/l)

180.5

±

26.1

(4.67

±

0.68)

105

±

39.2

(2.72

±

1.02)

<

0.001

HDL-C (mg/dl)

(mmol/l)

56.8

±

13.6

(1.47

±

0.35)

54

±

11.5

(1.40

±

0.30)

0.093

AST (U/l)

22.8

±

6.7

23.3

±

6.5

0.819

ALT (U/l)

22.8

±

9.7

23.6

±

9.3

0.759

CPK (U/l)

94

±

31.3

116

±

73.8

0.007

*Student’s

t

-test,

p

<

0.05.

SD: standard deviation; NTG: post-nitrate; FMD: flow-mediated dilation; EID:

endothelium-independent dilation; AST: aspartate transaminase; ALT: alanine

transaminase; CPK: creatinine phosphokinase; TG: triglycerides; TC: total

cholesterol; LDL-C: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-C: high-density

lipoprotein cholesterol.

Table 3. Statistical comparison between atorvastatin and rosuvastatin

groups in terms of baseline brachial artery measurements

Baseline brachial artery

measurements

Atorvastatin

group

Rosuvastatin

group

p

-value

*

BA basal diameter (mm)

4.01

±

0.6

4.02

±

0.5

0.850

BA basal velocity (cm/s )

71.95

±

14.8

79.32

±

16.9 0.240

BA hyperaemia diameter (mm)

4.34

±

0.6

4.43

±

0.5

0.404

BA hyperaemia velocity (cm/s)

72.21

±

15.9

73.4

±

16.3 0.713

BA NTG diameter (mm)

4.6

±

0.6

4.69

±

0.5

0.451

BA NTG velocity (cm/s)

68.92

±

15.4

68.23

±

15.5 0.833

BA FMD (%)

8.52

±

3.3

9.71

±

3.4

0.750

BA EID (%)

15.31

±

5.1

16.84

±

5.8

0.159

*Student’s

t

-test,

p

<

0.05.

SD: standard deviation; BA: brachial artery; NTG: post-nitrate; FMD: flow-

mediated dilation; EID: endothelium-independent dilation.

Table 4. Rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin in terms of non-invasive test

results after 12 months of statin therapy

Brachial artery measurements

after therapy

Atorvastatin

group

(

n

=

50)

Rosuvastatin

group

(

n

=

54)

p

-value*

BA basal diameter (mm)

3.87

±

0.59

4.17

±

0.54

0.09

BA basal velocity (cm/s)

78.82

±

13.40 72.55

±

22.3

0.743

BA hyperaemia diameter (mm)

4.29

±

0.60

4.60

±

0.52

0.006

BA hyperaemia velocity (cm/s)

80.03

±

16.8

71.12

±

18.5

0.017

BA NTG diameter (mm)

4.78

±

0.60

4.75

±

0.52

0.757

BA NTG velocity (cm/s)

71.2

±

19.45

61.1

±

16.32 0.323

BA FMD (%)

10.42

±

3.3

11.75

±

3.7

0.122

BA EID (%)

16.3

±

4.83

18.2

±

5.83

0.115

*Student’s

t

-test,

p

<

0.05.

SD: standard deviation; BA: brachial artery; NTG: post-nitrate; FMD: flow-

mediated dilation, EID: endothelium-independent dilation.

Table 5. Changes in brachial artery measurements after 12 months of

treatment in the atorvastatin versus rosuvastatin group

Change in brachial artery

measurements after therapy

Atorvastatin

group (

n

=

50)

Median (25

75%)

Rosuvastatin

group (

n

=

54)

Median (25–75%)

p

-value

*

BA basal diameter (mm)

0.011 (–0.041–0.031) 0.010 (–0.007–0.045) 0.089

BA basal velocity (cm/s)

0.001 (–0.119–0.157) –0.043 (–0.206–0.378) 0.120

BA hyperaemia diameter (mm) 0.018 (–0.034–0.060) 0.021 (0.011–0.048) 0.644

BA hyperaemia velocity (cm/s) 0.056 (–0.087–0.0347) –0.012 (–0.168–0.116) 0.088

BA NTG diameter (mm)

0.028 (0.008–0.045) 0.020 (–0.028–0.036) 0.045

BA NTG velocity (cm/s)

–0.004 (–0.167–0.113) –0.020 (0.0113–0.088) 0.982

BA FMD (%)

0.203 (0.008–0.441) 0.193 (0.049–0.0433) 0.958

BA EID (%)

0.110 (–0.115–0.225) 0.037 (–0.460–0.347) 0.827

*Mann–Whitney

U

-test,

p

<

0.05.

BA: brachial artery; NTG: post-nitrate; FMD: flow-mediated dilation; EID: endo-

thelium-independent dilation.