CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 29, No 3, May/June 2018
170
AFRICA
guide wire. Although techniques using arteriovenous loops have
been described previously,
19,22
they never gained widespread
acceptance, either because the wire was snared inside the left
ventricle,
19
or because the balloon was advanced through the
arterial end of the loop.
22
With the current catheters, guide wires
and snares available, our technique is definitely much more
straightforward than the originally proposed variants.
This technique may be considered a good option in resource-
limited settings where the Inoue balloon is not always an available
option. Compared with the Inoue balloon, the total cost of the
Nucleus balloon and its associated hardware is significantly less.
Besides, the Nucleus balloon is easier to clean and resterilise as it
has a single layer, compared to cleaning the Inoue balloon. It can
be reused multiple times, offering a significant cost advantage
in resource-limited settings such as ours. This technique may
also be easier for use in children by paediatric interventionists
who may not be familiar with the Inoue balloon technique but
frequently use arteriovenous loops for other interventions.
One of our patients developed a tear in the anterior mitral
valve leaflet and underwent valve replacement surgery. This
complication may not be associated specifically with the
described technique and could potentially occur with the Inoue
balloon and other techniques. In fact, when inspected by the
surgeon, the valve appeared too dysplastic to attempt repair.
However, our technique carries a potential complication of
inflating the balloon partially in the left ventricular outflow tract,
thus avulsing the sub-valvar mitral apparatus. Great care has to
be taken to not fully inflate the balloon if it seems to engage
partially in the outflow tract during gentle initial inflation.
Although our patient population was small, the outcomes
achieved in terms of increase in mitral valve area and reduction
of mean transmitral diastolic gradient were comparable to
those obtained with the Inoue balloon and other techniques.
21,23
Estimated pulmonary artery pressure also dropped significantly.
These outcomes were maintained on follow up at close to two
years. Except for one patient who had an anterior leaflet tear
leading to severe mitral regurgitation, the degree of mitral
regurgitation was mild or less in all cases at the last follow up.
A limitation is that the number of patients in our study was
relatively small. Furthermore, we did not compare our technique
head to head with other techniques; it was based rather on a
literature review.
Conclusion
The Inoue balloon is not usually available in our centre as we get
most of our consumables on donation. Our modified Nucleus
balloon technique for mitral valve dilation in patients with mitral
stenosis is effective and safe. The technique differs from other
over-the-wire balloon techniques described in the past in that it
avoids placing a stiff wire in the left ventricle, avoiding the risk
of ventricular arrhythmia. It also offers better balloon stability
and control owing to the arteriovenous loop. This technique can
potentially be used with any other balloon available and may
be easier for use by paediatric interventionists who might not
be familiar with the Inoue balloon technique. TEE guidance is
very useful to avoid the potential risk of inflating the balloon
in the left ventricular outflow tract or through the sub-valvar
apparatus. The Nucleus balloon can also be resterilised and used
multiple times.
References
1.
Thakur JS, Negi PC, Ahluwalia SK, Vaidya NK. Epidemiological
survey of rheumatic heart disease among school children in the Shimla
Hills of northern India: prevalence and risk factors.
J Epidemiol
Commun Health
1996;
50
: 62–67.
2.
Padamavati S. Rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease in develop-
ing countries.
Bull World Health Org
1978;
56
: 543–550.
3.
Rick AR, Gregory JE. Experimental evidence that lesions with basic
characteristics of rheumatic carditis can result from anaphylactic hyper-
sensitivity.
Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp
1943;
73
: 239.
4.
Al-Bahrani IR, Thamer MA, Al-Omeri MM, Al-Namaan YD.
Rheumatic heart disease in the young in Iraq.
Br Heart J
1966;
28
: 824.
5.
Borman JB, Stern S, Shapira T, Milvidsky H, Braun K. Mitral valvoto-
my in children.
Am Heart J
1961;
61
: 763.
6.
Shrivastava S, Tandon R. Severity of rheumatic mitral stenosis in chil-
dren.
Int J Cardiol
1991;
30
: 163–167.
7.
Tadele H, Mekonnen W, Tefera E. Rheumatic mitral stenosis in chil-
dren: more accelerated course in sub-Saharan patients.
BMC Cardiovasc
Disord
2013;
13
: 95.
8.
Horstkotte D, Niehues R, Strauer BE. Pathomorphological aspects,
aetiology and natural history of acquired mitral stenosis.
Eur Heart J
1991;
12
: 55–60.
9.
Cardoso LF, Grinberg M, Rati MA,
et al.
Comparison between percu-
taneous balloon valvuloplasty and open commissurotomy for mitral
stenosis: a prospective and randomized study.
Cardiology
2002;
98
:
186–190.
10. Ben Farhat M, Ayari M, Maatouk F,
et al
. Percutaneous balloon versus
surgical closed and open mitral commissurotomy: seven-year follow-up
results of a randomized trial.
Circulation
1998;
97
: 245–250.
11. Reyes VP, Raju BS, Wynne J,
et al.
Percutaneous balloon valvuloplasty
compared with open surgical commissurotomy for mitral stenosis
N
Engl J Med
1994;
331
: 961–967.
12. Hasan-Ali H, Shams-Eddin H, Abd-Elsayed AA, Maghraby MH.
Echocardiographic assessment of mitral valve morphology after percu-
taneous transvenous mitral commissurotomy (PTMC).
Cardiovasc
Ultasound
2007;
5
: 48.
13. Inoue K, Owaki T, Nakamura T, Kitamura F, Miyamoto N. Clinical
application of transvenous mitral commissurotomy by a new balloon
catheter.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
1984;
87
: 394–402.
14. Ribeiro PA, al Zaibag M, Rajendran V,
et al
. Mechanism of mitral valve
area increase by
in vitro
single and double balloon mitral valvotomy.
Am
J Cardiol
1988;
62
: 264–269.
15. Reid CL, Otto CM, Davis KB, Labovitz A, Kisslo KB, McKay CR.
Influence of mitral valve morphology on mitral balloon commis-
surotomy: immediate and six-month results from the NHLBI Balloon
Valvuloplasty Registry.
Am Heart J
1992;
124
: 657–665.
16. Bonhoeffer P, Esteves C, Casal U,
et al
. Percutaneous mitral valve
dilatation with the multi-track system.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv
1999;
48
: 173–183.
17. Cribier A, Eltchaninoff H, Koning R,
et al.
Percutaneous mechanical
mitral commissurotomy with a newly designed metallic valvulotome:
immediate results of the initial experience in 153 patients.
Circulation
1999;
99
: 793–799.
18. Lock JE, Khalilullah M, Shrivastava S, Bahl V, Keane JF. Percutaneous
catheter commissurotomy in rheumatic mitral stenosis.
N Engl J Med
1985;
313
: 1515–1518.
19. Commeau PGG, Huret B, Foucault JP, Potier JC, Commeau P, Grollier
G,
et al
. Percutaneous mitral valvotomy in rheumatic mitral stenosis: a
new approach.
Br Heart J
1987;
58
: 142–147.
20. Uruchurtu Chavarin E, Sanchez A, Solis H,
et al.
Immediate results