Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  44 / 76 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 44 / 76 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 29, No 4, July/August 2018

242

AFRICA

Methods

We operated on 70 patients (flanged Bentall de Bono: 46, David

V: 24) for aortic root aneurysm in our hospital between April 2009

and June 2013. Data were evaluated retrospectively. Patients were

divided into two groups according to the procedure. Patients who

had the flanged Bentall de Bono procedure were in group 1, and

those who had the David V procedure were in group 2.

All patients were intubated under general anaesthesia and

they were on mechanical ventilation during the operation. A right

jugular central venous catheter was inserted routinely. A standard

median sternotomy was performed and cardiopulmonary

bypass was instituted. The venous line was inserted through

the right atrial appendage generally, but selective bicaval venous

cannulation was performed in some cases. Myocardial protection

was achieved by cardioplegia, specifically by intermittent

antegrade or simultaneous antegrade and retrograde (66.5%)

administration of hypothermic blood cardioplegia, according

to the decision of the surgeon. A venting cannula was inserted

through the right superior pulmonary vein.

In group 1 we performed a modified version of the Bentall

procedure, called a flanged Bentall. In this procedure, the

ascending aorta is resected and the coronary ostia are prepared

as buttons. Then the aortic root and valve is resected. A

mechanical aortic valve is sutured to the composite graft, leaving

a part of the proximal side everted outwards (flange). This is

done with continuous polyprolene sutures from the stent of the

valve to the graft. The conduit is sutured to the aortic annulus

with polyprolene sutures from the flanged part. After this, the

coronary buttons are sutured to the graft. The distal part of the

graft is then sutured to the distal aorta with teflon felt.

In group 2, a routine transverse aortotomy was done about

2 cm above the coronary ostia. If it was clear that there was no

structural pathology on the aortic valve, the ascending aorta was

resected, keeping 5 mm of aortic tissue on the aortic annulus.

Thereafter the standard David V procedure was performed.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 15.0

software. Compliance with the normal distribution of variables

was evaluated with visual (histogram and probability graphics)

and analytical methods (Kolmogorov–Simirnov/Shapiro–Wilk

tests). Descriptive analysis was done using frequency tables

for categorical variables and means and standard deviations

for normally distributed variables. We used the median and

25th and 75th quartiles for analysis of variables without a

normal distribution. To compare the groups, we performed an

independent samples

t-

test for variables with normal distribution,

and the Mann–Whitney

U-

test for those without a normal

distribution. We also performed Pearson’s chi-squared test (

χ

2

)

for categorical variables;

p

<

0.05 was considered as significant.

Results

The mean age of the patients was 52.01

±

16.82 years, and 52

(74.3%) were male and 18 (25.7%) were female. There were

statistically significant differences between the groups in terms

of age and having coronary artery disease (

p

=

0.04 and

p

<

0.001, respectively). Demographic features of the groups are

summarised in Table 1.

When we compared the pre-operative echocardiographic

findings, there was a statistically significant difference in the

aortic annulus diameter between the groups (

p

=

0.03). Mean

aortic annulus diameter was 3.30

±

1.32 cm in group 1 and 2.76

±

0.41 cm in group 2. Mean ascending aorta diameter was 5.49

±

1.18 cm in group 1 and 5.73

±

0.99 cm in group 2 (

p

=

0.39).

There was no significant difference in terms of degree of aortic

insufficiency between the groups (

p

> 0.05) (Table 2).

When we compared surgical data (Table 3), average

cardiopulmonary bypass time was 69.55 min shorter in group

1 (

p

=

0.001, 95% CI: 108.19–30.90 min). Average arterial cross-

clamp time was 80.75 min shorter in group 1 (

p

<

0.001, CI:

101.55–59.95 min).

With regard to postoperative complications, postoperative

arrhythmias were seen in four (8.6 %) and one (4.2%) patient in

groups 1 and 2, respectively (

p

=

0.004). There was no statistically

significant difference between the groups in terms of respiratory

complications, bleeding requiring re-exploration, and intra-

aortic balloon pump (IABP) usage. No stroke was observed in

either group.

We lost one patient in each group and there was no statistically

significant difference between the groups in terms of mortality

rate. ICU stay was shorter in group 1. Average ICU stay was 1.85

±

1.02 days in group 1 and 3.70

±

3.07 days in group 2 (

p

=

0.003).

Table 1. Demographic data of the two groups

Demographics

Group 1

(

n

=

46)

Group 2

(

n

=

24)

p-

value

Age

50.04

±

18.05 58.70

±

12.67 0.04

Male gender,

n

(%)

35 (76)

17 (70.8)

0.63

COPD,

n

(%)

16 (34.7)

10 (41.6)

0.57

Smoking,

n

(%)

14 (30.4)

12 (50)

0.10

Hypertension,

n

(%)

26 (56.5)

18 (75)

0.12

Diabetes mellitus,

n

(%)

15 (32.6)

6 (25)

0.51

Coronary artery disease,

n

(%)

2 (4.3)

9 (37.5)

<

0.001

Peripheral vascular disease,

n

(%)

2 (4.3)

0 (0)

0.54

NYHA class 1,

n

(%)

8 (17.3)

4 (16.6)

<

0.06

NYHA class 2,

n

(%)

12 (26.08)

7 (29.1)

NYHA class 3,

n

(%)

14 (30.4)

7 (29.1)

NYHA class 4,

n

(%)

12 (26.08)

6 (25)

COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary diesase, NYHA: New York Heart Asso-

ciation.

Table 2. Pre-operative echocardiographic findings

Pre-operative echo findings

Group 1 (

n

=

46) Group 2(

n

=

24)

p-

value

Ascending aorta diameter

5.49

±

1.18

5.73

±

0.99

0.39

Aortic annulus diameter

3.30

±

1.32

2.76

±

0.41

0.03

Sinus of Valsalva diameter

5.16

±

1.17

5.08

±

0.69

0.79

EF (%)

60.85

±

7.4

57.50

±

10.57

0.42

LVESD (cm)

3.74

±

1.04

5.45

±

7.8

0.17

LVEDD (cm)

5.43

±

1.06

7.98

±

11.59

0.16

IVS (cm)

1.25

±

0.19

1.11

±

0.12

0.50

AI,

n

(%)

31 (67.3)

19 (79.1)

0.30

AI degree

0.13

1,

n

(%)

7 (15.2)

0 (0)

2,

n

(%)

11 (23.9)

10 (41.6)

3,

n

(%)

4 (8.6)

4 (16.6)

4

9 (19.5)

5 (20.8)

Echo: echocardiography, EF: ejection fraction, LVESD: left ventricular end-

systolic diameter, LVEDD: left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, IVS: inter-

ventricular septum, AI: aortic insufficiency, cm: centimetre.