Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  44 / 64 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 44 / 64 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 30, No 4, July/August 2019

230

AFRICA

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) was calculated

using the Friedewald equation.

38

EDTA plasma samples were thawed and extracted with

chloroform:methanol (2:1 v/v) according to the modified

Folch method.

39

The plasma phospholipid FA fraction was

isolated by thin-layer chromatography from the extracted

lipids.

40

Subsequently, the phospholipid FA fraction was

transmethylated to FA methyl esters and analysed by quadrupole

gas chromatography electron ionisation mass spectrometry

by means of an Agilent Technologies 7890 A GC system, as

described by Baumgartner

et al

.

40

Thirty-two FAs were measured in fasted plasma samples

from 711 participants. Six FAs, i.e. pentadecanoic acid (C15:0),

margaric acid (C17:0), trans vaccenic acid (C18:1n-7t), rumenic

acid (C18:2n-7tt), stearidonic acid (C18:4n-3) and eicosatrienoic

(C20:3n-3) were below the limit of quantification and therefore

not included. The remaining 26 plasma phospholipid FAs

were quantified and expressed as a percentage of total FAs.

Quality of data was assured with a separate calibration for each

FA, monitoring of internal standard (1,2-diheptadecanoyl-sn-

glycerol-3 phosphorylchloline, Matreya, Pennsylvania, USA)

and Levey Jennings graphs for a pooled plasma control analysed

with each batch.

The MetS was defined according to recommendations by the

Joint Interim Statement of six international associations as the

presence of three or more of the following: (1) fasting plasma

glucose levels

5.6 mmol/l or the use of oral hypoglycaemic

medication; (2) serum triglycerides

1.7 mmol/l; (3) serum HDL

1.0 mmol/l for men and

1.3 mmol/l for women; (4) BP

130/85 mmHg or the use of BP medication; and (5) WC of

94

cm for men and

80 cm for women.

41

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables were described as medians and interquartile

ranges if data deviated from the normal distribution according

to the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, whereas categorical variables

were presented as percentages. Non-normally distributed data

were log transformed before inclusion in regression models.

Participants’ characteristics were compared by gender and BMI

categories using the Mann–Whitney

U

-test or chi-squared test

for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Differences

between individual FAs and ratios by BMI and gender groups

were tested with the Mann–Whitney test. A BMI

<

25 kg/m

2

was considered as underweight and/or normal-weight or lean,

whereas BMI

25 kg/m

2

was considered overweight and/or

obese. The effect size of the differences between groups was

calculated using the Man–Whitney

U

-value and sample size of

the groups.

42

Principal-component-based varimax factor analysis of the

correlation matrix was used to define dietary FA (based on the

QFFQ) and plasma phospholipid FA patterns. The identification

and naming of 11 dietary FAs and 26 plasma phospholipid

FAs used in this study are based on relevant literature and the

levels of specific FAs observed in our population.

43

The number

of factors to retain was established by the Kaiser criterion

(eigenvalues

>

1) and scree-plot visual inspection. Loadings

with absolute values

>

0.5 were considered as relevant for the

contribution to each FA pattern. The associations between FA

patterns and outcomes were evaluated by sequential regression

models, logistic regression for the dichotomous outcome (MetS),

and generalised linear models for continuous outcomes (WC,

BMI and WHtR).

The first step of the sequential modelling analyses was

based on models that contained only dietary FAs or plasma

phospholipid FA patterns and was referred to as a crude

model. The crude model was then adjusted for gender and age

(adjusted model

1

). This model was further adjusted for lifestyle

confounders, including the level of education, physical activity,

alcohol and total energy intake, and self-reported smoking

status, creating a fully adjusted model. We further adjusted this

model for contraceptives (adjusted for in plasma phospholipid

FA pattern models only) and dietary factors, including total fats,

carbohydrates, dietary fibre and energy from added sugar as

individual confounders and as combined covariates.

Model fitting was evaluated using the adjusted

R

-square

for linear regression and maximum re-scaled

R

-square statistic

Table 1. Demographics, health and dietary intake data of

an apparently healthy cohort of 711 black South African adults

participating in the PURE study

Variables

Men (

n

=

273) Women (

n

=

438)

p

-value

c

Median (Q

1

, Q

3

)

b

Median (Q

1

, Q

3

)

b

Demographics

Age (years)

52 (46, 60)

52 (45, 59)

0.80

Education (educated),

n

(%)

155 (57.6)

263 (62.2)

0.22

Tobacco use (current

smoker),

n

(%)

163 (59.7)

205 (46.8)

0.0008

Alcohol (g/week)

6.4 (0, 24.9)

0 (0, 3.9)

<

0.0001

Physical activity index

2.8 (2.5, 3.1)

2.8 (2.5, 3.3)

0.71

Waist circumference (cm)

75.4 (69.7, 82.4)

82.0 (71.7, 92.6)

<

0.0001

Waist-to-height ratio

0.45 (0.4, 0.5)

0.52 (0.5, 0.6)

<

0.0001

Body mass index (kg/m

2

)

20.0 (18.1, 23.2)

26.0 (21.8, 31.9)

<

0.0001

Systolic blood pressure

(mmHg)

135 (121, 152)

132 (118, 150)

0.06

Diastolic blood pressure

(mmHg)

88 (78, 98)

88 (70, 97)

0.84

Fasting glucose (mmol/l)

4.8 (4.3, 5.4)

4.9 (4.3, 5.4)

0.53

Total cholesterol (mmol/l)

5.0 (4.1, 6.0)

5.1 (4.4, 6.2)

0.35

High-density lipoprotein

cholesterol (mmol/l)

1.54 (1.2, 2.1)

1.5 (1.2, 1.8)

0.04

Low-density lipoprotein

cholesterol (mmol/l)

3.1 (2.3, 4.0)

3.4 (2.7, 4.2)

0.06

Triglycerides (mmol/l)

1.0 (0.8, 1.5)

1.2 (0.9, 1.8)

0.002

Dietary intake

g

Total energy (kcal/day)

1874 (1377, 2612) 1628 (1189, 2212)

0.001

Total carbohydrate (g/day) 285.4 (199, 378) 248.8 (180.6, 325.1)

0.01

Total fibre (g/day)

14.8 (25, 30)

17.9 (12.7, 25.2)

0.004

Total protein (g/day)

55.0 (38, 75.7)

46.2 (33.1, 65.0)

<

0.0001

Total fat (g/day)

45.3 (28.5, 63.7)

40.5 (26.3, 64.4)

0.10

Total saturated fatty acids

(g/day)

10.5 (6.5, 15.7)

9.5 (5.6, 16.6)

0.13

Total mono-unsaturated

fatty acids (g/day)

11.4 (6.8, 17.8)

10.4 (6.0, 18.3)

0.14

Total polyunsaturated fatty

acids (g/day)

13.6 (8.8, 19.6)

13.1 (7.5, 20.0)

0.47

Total n-3 polyunsaturated

fatty acids (g/day)

0.4 (0.2, 0.6)

0.33 (0.20, 0.5)

0.15

Total n-6 polyunsaturated

fatty acids (g/day)

13.3 (8.8, 19.2)

12.9 (7.3, 19.6)

0.55

a

Baseline demographic details of participants.

b

Data are presented as median (interquartile range): Q

1

, lower interquartile

range; Q

3

, upper interquartile range.

c

Significance levels of differences in parameters between men and women, based

on Mann–Whitney and chi-squared tests for continuous and categorical vari-

ables, respectively.