Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  39 / 70 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 39 / 70 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 30, No 5, September/October 2019

AFRICA

281

alirocumab dose during the parent studies. However, all eligible

patients fromHigh FH received a starting dose of alirocumab 150

mg Q2W because this study had selected patients with LDL-C

>

4.14 mmol/l at baseline. Alirocumab was self-administered by the

patient via subcutaneous injection using a pre-filled pen injector.

LDL-C levels were unblinded from week 8 to allow for

dose adjustment at the investigator’s discretion. Up-titration to

alirocumab 150 mg Q2W could occur from week 12 onwards

if LDL-C was

>

1.8 mmol/l. In addition, down-titration to

alirocumab 75 mg Q2W was possible at the investigator’s

discretion. Background treatment, including statin and other

lipid-modifying treatment, were to be maintained unchanged

unless tolerability warranted adjustment.

Site visits were performed at weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48,

60, 72, 84, 96 and 108. During these visits lipid parameters,

liver function tests, creatinine phosphokinase, haematological

and chemistry investigations were performed. Anti-alirocumab

antibodies were assessed by the Regeneron Clinical Bioanalysis

group from serum samples, as previously described.

8

This study was conducted in accordance with the principles

laid down by the 18thWorldMedical Assembly and all applicable

amendments laid down by the World Medical Assemblies and

the ICH guidelines for good clinical practice. This clinical trial

was recorded in clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01954394).

Written informed consent was obtained before a patient’s

participation in the clinical trial and all patients were given a

copy of the signed informed consent. This clinical trial protocol

was approved by the relevant private and public sector ethics

committee. The clinical events committee was responsible for

defining, validating and classifying cardiovascular events, as well

as validating the classification of the cause of all deaths.

Statistical analysis

As this study was an open-label extension for patients from

previous studies, no calculation of sample size was performed.

Safety analyses were performed on the safety population, which

consisted of patients receiving at least one dose or a partial

dose of alirocumab in the current study. Efficacy analyses were

performed on patients receiving at least one dose or a partial

dose of alirocumab in the current study, with a baseline (from

the parent study) LDL-C value available and with at least one

LDL-C value available in the period from first alirocumab

injection in the current study to last injection plus 21 days; a

modified intention to treat (mITT) analysis.

Safety analysis [adverse events (including adjudicated

cardiovascular events), laboratory, vital signs] was descriptive,

based on the safety population. The safety analysis focused on

the Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) period defined

as the time from the first dose of the current study to the last

dose of alirocumab plus 70 days (10 weeks).

Efficacy variables were explored through descriptive statistics

at each scheduled visit of the current study; 95% confidence

intervals are provided for percent changes from baseline and

success rate to reach targets.

Results

The study enrolled 167 South African patients at 14 sites.

Baseline characteristics and medical history for the participants

are indicated in Table 2.

All patients received treatment with lipid-modifying therapy

(LMT) at study entry (Table 3). High-dose statin and ezetimibe

use was 64.7 and 27.5%, respectively. Data specifying specific

combinations of statins and ezetimibe used during the study

were not recorded. During the OLE study, concomitant LMT

was adjusted at the investigator’s discretion.

Of the 42 patients for whom a change in statin therapy was

reported during the OLE study, 18 reported a change in statin

type, 15 reported dose adjustments in statin therapy, while nine

patients discontinued statins. The reasons provided included

adverse events, supply issues, treatment cost and other.

The mean (

±

SD) baseline LDL-C was 3.65

±

1.9 mmol/l.

Mean LDL-C level was reduced by 48.7% at week 144; mean

on-treatment LDL-C was 2.30

±

1.24 mmol/l at week 144. At

week 144, 40 of 98 patients with data available (40.8%) reached

target LDL-C

<

1.81 mmol/l and/or

50% reduction from

the parent study baseline, and 64/98 (65.3%) patients reached

LDL-C

<

2.59 mmol/l. During the OLE study, calculated LDL-C

values

<

0.65 mmol/l were reported on two consecutive occasions

for four patients (Table 4, Fig. 2).

Table 2. Baseline characteristics and medical history for ODYSSEY

OLE participants in South Africa

Variables

Placebo

in parent

study

(

n

=

62)

Alirocumab

in parent

study

(

n

=

105)

All

(

n

=

167)

Age (years), mean (SD)

55.4 (10.7) 55.6 (12.6) 55.5 (11.9)

Gender (%, male)

45.2

39.0

41.3

Race (%)

White

Asian

Other

Black

White/Asian

85.5

1.6

0

9.7

3.2

87.6

0

3.8

4.8

3.8

86.8

0.6

2.4

6.6

3.6

Body mass index (kg/m

2

), mean (SD) 29.97 (6.09) 30.90 (6.40) 30.55 (6.28)

Heterozygous familial

hypercholesterolaemia (%)

Confirmation by genotyping

WHO/Simon Broome criteria

22.6

77.4

18.1

81.9

19.8

80.2

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular

disease (%)

56.5

42.9

47.9

Coronary heart disease* (%)

54.8

41.9

46.7

Myocardial infarction (%)

24.2

21.0

22.2

Unstable angina (%)

16.1

9.5

12.0

Ischaemic stroke (%)

8.1

3.8

5.4

Peripheral arterial disease (%)

3.2

1.9

2.4

Coronary revascularisation

procedures (%)

32.3

26.7

28.7

Hypertension (%)

58.1

47.6

51.5

Type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus (%)

19.4

10.5

13.8

Family history of premature CHD 58.1

57.1

57.5

*According to information gathered and adverse events recorded during the

parent study as well as during the pre-treatment period of the OLE study.

Table 3. Background lipid-modifying therapy at baseline of the

ODYSSEY OLE study

Lipid-modifying therapy

All,

n

(%)

(

n

=

167)

High-intensity statin

108 (64.7)

Atorvastatin (40 or 80 mg)

61 (36.5)

Rosuvastatin (20 or 40 mg)

45 (26.9)

Simvastatin (40 or 80 mg)

37 (22.1)

Ezetimibe

46 (27.5)

Nutraceuticals

4 (2.4)

Change in statin therapy after enrolment in OLE

42 (25.1)

Used in combination with statins or not. May include ezetimibe.