Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  29 / 64 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 29 / 64 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 31, No 3, May/June 2020

AFRICA

137

Methods

A prospective cohort study was conducted from 2010 to 2016

at a tertiary multidisciplinary maternal care facility in Cape

Town, South Africa.

This is an analysis of an ongoing cohort

for which data on methodology, overall patient characteristics

and diagnosis, as well as six- and 12-month outcome has been

published recently.

29,30

All patients gave written informed consent. All principles

from the Declaration of Helsinki were adhered to. The study

was approved by the ethics committee of the University of Cape

Town (HEC ref: 173/2010).

Of 178 consecutive pregnant womenwith SHD, 24.2%received

BBs (

n

=

43) in pregnancy. Data were manually extracted from

both cardiology and obstetric clinical records, after screening for

eligibility, and captured in a modified database. Data parameters

recorded included gestational age, gender, mode of delivery,

birth weight and Apgar scores for all patients. Data on type of

BB used, treatment dosage, treatment duration in weeks and

trimester of BB initiation were additionally recorded for the BB

group. The type of BB available and prescribed in South African

public service hospitals was recorded. Atenolol and carvedilol

are the only BBs approved for provincial service in South Africa.

SHD pregnancies were sub-divided into congenital, valvular,

cardiomyopathy and ‘other’ for extended analysis. The subgroup

‘other’ included infiltrative heart disease such as sarcoidosis,

ischaemic heart disease and heart disease caused by arrhythmias.

Patient exclusion criteria included: (1) essential information

regarding birth weight, and gestational age not available, (2)

pregnancies not exceeding 24 weeks of gestation, and (3)

therapeutic abortions at any gestational period. Adverse foetal

outcomes were defined as: perinatal death, LBW defined as

birth weight

<

2 500 g, Apgar scores

<

7 and premature birth

(

<

37 weeks).

Statistical analysis

The descriptive statistics are stated as frequency, median and

interquartile range or mean value and standard deviations where

applicable. Comparison of continuous variables between case

and control groups was performed using unpaired Student’s

t

-tests for data normally distributed. Otherwise the Mann–

Whitney

U

-test was used. To compare categorical variables, the

chi-squared or two-tailed Fisher’s exact test was used where

appropriate;

p

<

0.05 was considered to be significant at the 95%

confidence level.

Finally, we correlated the treatment duration of oral BBs with

the relative deviation from expected FBW for the 24 patients for

whom data were available. Data analysis was performed using

SPSS 24 for Windows. Figures were created with GraphPad

Prism 7 for Windows, Version 7.03.

Results

Baseline characteristics of all pregnancies are shown in Table

1. Pregnant women exposed to BBs were older than those

who were not. No significant differences were noted between

the groups for clinical and echocardiographic parameters.

When dividing pregnancies into those with New York Heart

Association (NYHA) I–II and III–IV physical limitation, a

significant increase (

p

=

0.001) was noted between the number

of pregnancies exposed to BBs compared to those not exposed.

Of the 178 patients analysed in this study, 64 (36%) presented

with CHD, indicating predominance within this subgroup

compared to valvular heart disease (33.1%), cardiomyopathy

(20.2%) and ‘other’ (10.7%) (Fig. 1). Dividing BB use among

the four subgroups revealed higher BB usage within the valvular

(32.6%) and cardiomyopathy (41.9%) subgroups.

BB exposure during pregnancy was found to be associated

with a non-significant increased mean FBW (2 912 vs 2 807 g,

p

=

0.347) and a similar mean gestational age of delivery (GAD)

(37.4 vs 37.5 weeks,

p

=

0.841) (Fig. 2A, B). The outcomes of

mean GAD in weeks and mean FBW among the four subgroups

are shown in Table 2. The highest mean GAD and FBW were

found in the valvular (37.7 weeks) and cardiomyopathy (2 999 g)

subgroups, respectively. Lowest mean FBW was in the ‘other’

group and lowest mean GAD occurred in the cardiomyopathy

group. When comparing the different types of BBs used (atenolol

Table 1. Baseline maternal characteristics of study population (

n

=

178)

Clinical characteristic

All

(

n

=

178)

BB used

(

n

=

43)

BB not

used

(

n

=

135)

p

-value

Age (years)

28

±

6

30

±

6

28

±

6 0.008

Parity,

n

(range)

2 (1–5)

2 (1–4)

1 (1–5)

0.153

BMI (kg/cm

2

)

28.1

±

7.3 28.4

±

7.0 27.9

±

7.4 0.664

Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)

121

±

16 121

±

17 121

±

15 0.721

Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) 74

±

12 76

±

13 73

±

12 0.199

Heart rate (beats/min)

86

±

17 88

±

15 85

±

12 0.176

NYHA functional class,

n

(%)

I/II

152 (88)

31 (74)

121 (92)

0.001

III/IV

21 (12)

11 (26)

10 (8)

Haemoglobin (g/dl)

11.6

±

1.7 11.7

±

1.5 11.5

±

1.7 0.340

Echocardiography

LVEDD (mm)

48.5

±

7.6 50.1

±

8.3 48.1

±

7.3 0.112

LVESD (mm)

33.6

±

7.6 35.5

±

9.7 33.0

±

6.7 0.099

Ejection fraction (%)

58.6

±

11.8

56.1

±

13.7

59.6

±

10.5

0.132

General medical history (%)

Chronic hypertension

17 (10)

4 (9)

13 (10)

0.949

HIV

38 (21)

9 (21)

29 (21)

0.921

Family history of CVD

31 (17)

7 (16)

24 (17)

0.843

Caesarian section,

n

(%)

90 (51)

25 (58)

65 (48)

0.291

Values are mean

±

SD unless otherwise specified.

p

-values based on unpaired

t

-tests, Mann–Whitney

U

-tests or chi-squared tests where appropriate.

BB, beta-blockers; BMI, body mass index; CVD, cardiovascular disease; LVEDD,

left ventricular end-diastolic diameter; LVESD, left ventricular end-systolic diam-

eter; NYHA, New York Heart Association; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus.

Congenital

Valvular

Cardio-

myopathy

Other

Number of patients

80

60

40

20

0

BB not used

BB used

Fig. 1.

Distribution of BB groups among the SHD subgroups.