Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  33 / 92 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 33 / 92 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 27, No 4, July/August 2016

AFRICA

235

untreated control cells (

p

<

0.05).

WithAP-2

α

overexpression, the activity levels of cells expressing

the wild-type allele were more reduced than those of cells expressing

the mutant-type (0.25 vs 0.38). The luciferase activity levels of

AP-2

α

overexpressing cells were lower than those of the untreated

cells (

p

<

0.05). Taken together, these results suggest that AP-2

α

was a negative regulatory factor for ApoM expression.

Fig. 6.

Confirmation of EMSA supershift results. To determine

whether unbound Sp1 existed with the Sp1 antibody,

we conducted cell immunohistochemistry experi-

ments. Cells expressing Sp1 were dyed brown–yellow

(B), and negative control cells were stained blue (A).

The results indicated that the extracted nucleoprotein

contained Sp1, and there was no problem in terms

of the Sp1 antibody quality. These results further

confirmed the EMSA supershift results.

A

B

TT

CT

Luciferase activity

6

5

4

3

2

1

0

untreated

AP-2

α

siRNA

GV141-AP-2

α

#

##

Fig. 8.

Relative luciferase activity of the ApoM promoter in

each transfected group. For TT groups: untreated, 1.84

±

0.12; TT + AP-2

α

, 4.83

±

0.08; TT + GV141-AP-2

α

,

1.38

±

0.06; For CT groups: untreated, 0.80

±

0.08;

CT + AP-2

α

, 3.19

±

0.07; CT + GV141-AP-2

α

, 0.51

±

0.05; PGL3-basic was used as a negative control

and PGL3-control as a positive control.

#

p

<

0.05 and

p

<

0.05 vs -855 wild-type untreated group and

##

p

<

0.05 and

p

<

0.05 vs -855 mutant untreated group

by paired

t

-test.

600 bp

500 bp

400 bp

300 bp

GAPDH

AP-2

α

Mark 1

2

3

4

5

empty plasmid

AP-2

α

expression plasmid

AP-2AGAPDH

0.74

0.72

0.70

0.68

0.66

0.64

0.62

0.60

0.58

0.56

AP-2

α

β

-actin

1

2

3

4

5

empty plasmid

AP-2

α

expression plasmid

AP-2AGAPDH

1.02

1.00

0.98

0.96

0.94

0.92

0.90

0.88

0.86

0.84

0.82

600 bp

500 bp

400 bp

300 bp

GAPDH

AP-2

α

M 1

2

1

2

AP-2

α

β

-actin

Fig. 7.

Efficiency of interference in siRNA fragments. After we determined the transfection efficiency of the fluorescent cells to

be

>

70%, we transfected HepG2 cells with siRNAs against AP-2

α

fragments and tested the ability of these fragments to

interfere with AP-2

α

mRNA and protein production (A, B). Interference efficiency was calculated using the Tanon GIS image

analysis system. The interference efficiencies of fragments 1, 2, and 3 on the AP-2

α

mRNA levels were 86.06, 83.68 and

92.43%, respectively, and on the AP-2

α

protein levels were 61.15, 58.42 and 79.59%, respectively. Because the interference

efficiency of fragment 3 was the highest, we selected this fragment for use in the subsequent experiments. Interference and

overexpression of AP-2

α

in HepG2 cells. RT-PCR (A) and Western blot analyses (B) of AP-2

α

mRNA and protein expression

levels, respectively, in HepG2 cells treated with three interference fragments for 72 hours. AP-2

α

overexpression in HepG2

cells resulted in elevated AP-2

α

RNA (C), and protein expression levels (D), compared to controls. AP-2

α

mRNA vs GAPDH

mRNA: 0.63

±

0.01 vs 0.71

±

0.02 (E); AP-2

α

protein vs

β

-actin protein: 0.89

±

0.03 vs 0.99

±

0.01 (F), both

p

<

0.05 by

paired

t

-test.

E

A

B

C

D

F