Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  69 / 76 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 69 / 76 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 27, No 6, November/December 2016

AFRICA

399

SASCI/SCTSSA joint consensus statement and

guidelines on transcatheter aortic valve implantation

(TAVI) in South Africa

Jacques Scherman, Hellmuth Weich

The South African Heart Association (SA Heart) together with

two of its special-interest groups, the South African Society

of Cardiovascular Intervention (SASCI) and the Society of

Cardiothoracic Surgeons in South Africa (SCTSSA), represent the

scientific, educational and professional interests of South African

cardiac specialists, with a combined membership of over 200

members. These two interest groups exclusively represent practicing

cardiologists and cardiothoracic surgeons in South Africa. SASCI

and SCTSSA are dedicated to maintaining the highest standards

of specialist practice and the highest quality of patient care. As a

result, SASCI and SCTSSA seek to serve as a knowledge resource

for patients and funders in matters related to new technology used

in the cardiac interventional and surgical disciplines.

The introduction of new technology is a constant in modern

medicine. While authorities in the United States of America

(USA) and European Union, such as the Food and Drug

Administration (FDA) and Conformité Européene (CE), provide

regulatory clearance on safety and effectiveness, practicing medical

practitioners require scientific evidence on net health outcomes

before offering new procedures to their patients. In addition, to meet

clinical expectations of practicing specialists, new technology must

stay consistent with fundamental medical and surgical principles.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is considered

a feasible technique, which may be used as an alternative to

standard surgical aortic valve replacement in selected cases. The

procedure is performed on the beating heart without the need for

a sternotomy or cardiopulmonary bypass. There are currently

two devices available in South Africa that are CE-marked and

approved by the FDA. The procedure may be performed via the

transfemoral, transsubclavian and transapical approaches or via

a mini-sternotomy (transaortic approach).

SA Heart and the respective boards of the SASCI and

SCTSSA by consensus hereby adopt the TAVI procedure for

aortic stenosis in line with the principles of evidence-based

medicine after considering the most recent published evidence

and the various multinational society position statements and

guidelines concerning TAVI.

This consensus guideline considers all the literature reviewed,

including the 2014 American Heart Association/American College

of Cardiology guideline for the management of patients with

valvular heart disease, the 2012 European Society of Cardiology/

European Association for Cardiothoracic Surgery guidelines on the

management of valvular heart disease, and the updated standardised

endpoint definitions for TAVI [as per the Valve Academic Research

Consortium-2 (VARC-2) consensus document].

1-3

Consensus guidelines on transcatheter aortic

valve implantation (TAVI)

Members of the SA Heart Association, SASCI and SCTSSA

with experience in the technique and knowledge of the TAVI

literature have agreed to the following consensus statement:

Requirements and structure of the multidisciplinary

heart team

The performance of TAVI,

ab initio

, should be restricted to

a limited number of high-volume centres, which have both

cardiology and cardiac surgery departments on site, with

expertise in structural heart disease intervention and high-risk

valvular surgery. Interventional cardiologists should be expe-

rienced in catheter-based valvular interventions and periph-

eral access using large devices. Cardiac surgeons should be

experienced in valve surgery and the management of complex

cases. It is recommended that all TAVI teams aim to perform

more than 10 implants per year.

TAVI should currently be reserved for patients who, after

evaluation by a multidisciplinary heart team (MDT) are

found to have a risk/benefit ratio favouring TAVI rather than

open-heart surgery. The heart team should at least include

a cardiologist, cardiac surgeon and imaging specialist. Its

composition is however dynamic and can also include a

cardiac anaesthetist, geriatrician and neurologist as well as

other members as the MDT sees fit.

Patients should be screened into a TAVI programme by a

MDT (as defined above) and not by an individual specialist.

Previously published in

SA Heart

2016;

13

(4): 298–300.

DOI: 10.5830/CVJA-2016-092

Chris Barnard Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery,

University of Cape Town, South Africa

Jacques Scherman, MB ChB, DipOccMed, MMed, FCCardio (SA),

jacques.scherman@uct.ac.za

Division of Cardiology, Tygerberg Hospital and

Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa

Hellmuth Weich, MB ChB, MRCP (UK), MMed (Int), Cert

Cardiology (CMSA),

hweich@sun.ac.za

Consensus Guidelines