Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  66 / 76 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 66 / 76 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 27, No 6, November/December 2016

396

AFRICA

CAD or at high risk thereof, smoking cessation, avoidance of

excess alcohol intake, an ACE-I for patients with asymptomatic

LVSD, and beta-blockade for those with LVSD after MI.

Heart failure is defined as appropriate symptoms, possibly

accompanied by physical signs of congestion, with evidence

of structural heart disease on echocardiography. The guideline

includes a new category of heart failure with mid-range ejection

fraction (HFmrEF) of 40–49% in the range between heart failure

with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and heart failure with

preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Treatment of HFmrEF is

yet to be clearly defined.

ProBNP is more important in ruling out heart failure than in

proving the diagnosis. Novel additions to the guidelines are the

use in appropriately selected patients of an angiotensin receptor

neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) (sacubitril-valsartan) to replace

ACE-I, cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT), and ivabradine

should they remain symptomatic on ACE-I/ARB, beta-blockade

and MRA treatment. HFpEF and HFmrEF should be treated

symptomatically, using diuretics to relieve congestive symptoms.

The guideline discusses at length various co-morbidities and

their management in the setting of heart failure.

A ‘hotline’ session was devoted to device interventions

in heart failure. The DANISH study evaluated the use of

implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) in non-ischaemic

heart failure in patients with NYHA class II to III symptoms

and an ejection fraction

<

35% (Fig. 2).

21

The study did not

achieve its primary endpoint of reducing mortality rates. There

was a reduction in incidence of sudden death and a reduction in

total mortality rate in the subgroup under 60 years of age. Two

other studies, REM-HF and MORE-CARE, reported on remote

monitoring for worsening heart failure. Both failed to show any

improvement in outcome.

Another two studies on cell therapy in heart failure could not

demonstrate any benefit.

Cardio-oncology

This is an emerging area of concern for cardiologists and

oncologists alike, given the increasing numbers of patients who

may now survive for years after cancer treatment. The heart

and blood vessels may be affected in a variety of ways by either

chemotherapy or radiation. Myocardial dysfunction and heart

failure, CAD, valvular heart disease, pericardial involvement,

arrhythmias, hypertension, pulmonary thromboembolism, stroke,

peripheral vascular disease or pulmonary hypertension may

occur, not only acutely but also after a delay of months or years.

The patient’s presentation is influenced by the agent used,

the dose and duration of treatment, age, kidney function and

pre-existing CV disease. Myocardial toxicity is of particular

concern and its early detection, as evidenced by deteriorating

LVSD on echocardiography in comparison to baseline values

and/or by elevation in hs-troponin T, is important. Baseline

echocardiography with follow up at the completion of treatment

and then at three and six months is recommended. ACE-I or

ARB, beta-blocker and MRA therapies are cardioprotective as

well as effective in managing overt heart failure. Not all patients

recover normal left ventricular function after the cessation of

treatment. In those who do, it may be possible to discontinue the

cardioprotective treatment.

22

Atrial fibrillation

Apart from death and stroke, the ESC 2016 guideline includes

recognition of hospitalisations, left ventricular dysfunction

and heart failure, cognitive decline and vascular dementia, and

impaired quality of life as consequences of AF. An algorithm is

provided for the detection of AF in patients with an implanted

device presenting after detection of a high atrial rate episode

lasting longer than five to six seconds or a rate

>

180 beats/min.

For the assessment of stroke risk and the need for

anticoagulation, the CHADS-VaSC score remains unchanged but

the stroke risk has been reclassified for women. Anticoagulation

is indicated in men with a score of 2 or more; for women it’s a

score of 3 or more. Anticoagulation is not mandated but may be

considered in men and women with respective scores of 1 or 2.

Bleeding risk scores should be considered to determine

the presence of modifiable risk factors for major bleeding

in patients taking anticoagulant therapy. A non-vitamin K

antagonist (VKA)/novel oral anticoagulant is preferred to

warfarin. Occlusion of the left atrial appendage may be

considered in patients who have a long-term contra-indication

to anticoagulation. The guideline provides recommendations

for the initiation of anticoagulation after transient ischaemic

attack or stroke and the re-initiation of anticoagulation after

intracranial bleeding.

The integrated management of AF includes symptom control,

maintenance of haemodynamic stability and the preservation of

LV function, stroke prevention and the management of CV risk

factors. Recommendations for ventricular rate control include

consideration of digoxin as a second-line therapy.

ENSURE-AF

23

examined the use of the factor Xa inhibitor

(edoxaban) versus enoxaparin/warfarin-VKA in electrical

cardioversion of non-valvular AF in 2 199 patients with and

without transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE). The average

CHADS-VaSC score was 2.6. The procedure was undertaken

with a delay of two and 23 days, respectively, depending on

whether or not patients had undergone TEE. There was a very

low event rate following cardioversion with a 50–60% reduction

in events with edoxaban and no increase in bleeding.

Cumulative event rate

1.0

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.2

0.0

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

560 540 517 438 344 248 169 88 12

556 540 526 451 358 272 186 107 17

Years

Controls

ICD

120 died in the ICD group and 131 in the control group

Hazard ratio = 0.87 (0.68 – 1.12)

p

= 0.28

Controls

ICD

Fig 2.

Primary outcome – all-cause mortality